DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

해양관광자원을 활용한 제주 신양항 리모델링 계획

Jeju Shinyang Fishing Port Remodeling Plan Utilizing Marine Tourism Resources

  • 김예림 (서울대학교 협동과정조경학) ;
  • 성종상 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Kim, Yelim (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Jong-Sang (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.01.15
  • 심사 : 2016.04.14
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30

초록

과거 어항(魚港)은 어촌의 생산 및 지역문화의 거점으로 중요한 역할을 하였으나 현대에 와서는 수산업 여건변화로 인해 그 의미가 퇴색되고 유휴공간이 되고 있다. 한편, 제주특별자치도는 2010년부터 해양관광활성화를 위한 노력을 기울이고 있다. 특히 신양항은 마리나항만 개발 예정구역으로 지정 고시되어 제주오션마리나시티 조성사업계획에 착수하였다. 그러나 이러한 해양관광을 활성화하려는 시도와는 달리 이제까지 시행된 제주도내 어항 리모델링 사업들은 대부분 노후시설을 개보수하는 토목사업 중심이었다. 또한 무분별한 개발로 지역경관을 해치는 사례들도 다수 발생하였는데, 경관은 한번 훼손되면 복구하기 힘들다는 특성이 있어 그 문제가 더욱 심각하다. 관 주도 사업의 경우에는 예산부족으로 투자가 저조하여 보강공사수준의 토목공사만 진행되거나 관리소홀이 문제되고 있으며, 민간투자 사업의 경우에는 수익금의 지역 환원이 되지 않는다는 문제가 제기되고 있다. 신양항 또한 2008년에 리모델링을 하였지만 외곽 방파제 연장공사 수준으로 마무리되어 근본적인 문제를 해결하지는 못하였고, 지역사회 활성화에 직접적인 도움이 되지 못하였다. 이러한 토목공사 중심의 개발, 공간의 관리소홀, 수익금의 지역 환원 문제를 해결하면서 마리나항 건설을 통한 해양관광 및 지역 활성화를 위해 본고에서는 첫째, 주변배후지를 연계한 개발계획을 제시하였다. 지역적 맥락을 읽고 현존하는 지형, 돌담, 길을 물리적인 계획에 활용하여 설계 및 프로그램에 반영하였다. 이를 통해 지역 경관 및 특성을 반영한 공간개발계획을 제시하고자 하였다. 둘째, 해양관광자원의 개념을 정리 및 보완하고, 계획요소를 도출하여 지역에 현존한 자원을 활용하고 새로운 해양관광자원을 도입하여 다양한 이용자의 수요를 충족하는 프로그램계획을 하였다. 셋째, 지역주민의 운영관리 참여를 통해 지속가능한 운영관리 방안을 검토하였다. 본 연구는 토목중심으로 시행되어왔던 어항 리모델링 계획을 조경적 관점에서 배후지와의 연계를 통해 통합적 계획안을 제안했다는 의의를 갖는다. 또한, 환경 사회 경제적 이슈 고려 및 지역주민의 참여 등은 이후 유사한 어항 및 수변공간 리모델링 계획 시 주안점이 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The fishing port was once the foothold of production as well as the stronghold of communities but with the declining of the fishing industry, ports became abandoned space. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province has continued its effort to vitalize marine tourism since 2010. Shinyang Port in particular is designated as a Prearranged Marina Port Development Zone, and planning for the Jeju Ocean Marina City project is underway. Nevertheless, fishing port remodeling projects implemented on Jeju so far have focused only on civil engineering such as renovating old facilities. In addition, most Marina Port Development Projects have been irrelevant to local communities. Leading projects by the local government mostly suffer from a lack of funding, which results in the renovation of old facilities and improper maintenance, while private sector investment projects do not lead to benefit sharing with the community. Shinyang Port, also renovated in 2008, ended up with outer breakwater extension construction that neither solved the fundamental problem of the site nor gave benefits to residents. To arrange a way to solve problems for civil engineering focused development project, improper maintenance, and benefit sharing with community, first, this study proposes a development plan that connects with the outlying areas near the ports. The plan reflects existing topography, Jeju traditional stonewalls, narrow paths on the master plan and programs by reading the regional context. In this way, this paper suggests a space development plan reflecting the local landscape and characteristic factors. Second, it satisfies various needs by using existing and new Marine Tourism Resources. Third, it examines sustainable operation and management measures through residents' participation. The proposal is significant in two key ways: it is a fresh attempt at connecting the fishing port with its outlying areas from a landscape perspective; and it considers environmental, social, economic issues, and suggests participation for local communities. Thus, the model can be used in future fishing-port remodeling plans for revitalizing unused space, including invaluable traditional landscapes, and for boosting the marine-leisure industry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arnstein, S. R.(1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  2. Bae, G.-J.(2007) A Study on Future Oriented Development of Fishing Port by Remodeling. Yonsei University, Master's Thesis, Unpublished
  3. Bassett, K., R. Griffiths and I. Smith(2002) Testing governance: partnerships, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration. Urban Studies 39(10): 1757-1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000002948
  4. Cho, W.-S., H.-G. Kim and Y.-G. Kim(2007) A study on the planning of waterfront about fishing village and harbor in east coast: Focused on the Sachun harbor of national harbor. Korean Institute of Rural Architecture 1: 25.
  5. Gospodini, A.(2001) Urban waterfront redevelopment in Greek cities: A framework for redesigning space. Cities 18(5): 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00022-1
  6. Hall, C. M.(2001) Trends in ocean and coastal tourism: The end of the last frontier?. Ocean and Coastal Management 44(9): 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00071-0
  7. Hoyle, B.(2000) Confrontation, consultation, cooperation? Community groups and urban change in Canadian port-city waterfronts. The Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe Canadien 44(3): 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2000.tb00706.x
  8. Huang, W.-C. and S.-K. Kao(2014) Public-private partnerships during waterfront development process: The example of the world exposition. Ocean and Costal Management. pp. 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.02.007
  9. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province(2011) 5 Year Plan for Marine Tourism.
  10. Jung, S.-J. and M.-A. Lee(2004) Marine Tourism. Seoul: Daewangsa.
  11. Kim, S.-G. and J.-W. Hong(2006). A Study on Marina Construction in Multi-Function Fishing Port. Korea Maritime Institute.
  12. Kim, S.-G.(2007) Introduction to Marine Tourism. Seoul: Hyunhaksa.
  13. Lee, S.-Y.(2008) A Study on the Effective Utilization of Local Fishing Port. Jeju Development Institute.
  14. Millspaugh, M. L.(2001) Waterfronts as catalysts for city renewal. Waterfronts in post-industrial cities, pp. 74-85.
  15. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2010) Marina Port General Planning.
  16. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries(2006) A Study on Infrastructure Construction for Marine Tourism.
  17. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries(2014) Planning Manual for Port and Fishing Port.
  18. Orams, M.(1999) Marine Tourism: Development, Impacts and Management. Psychology Press.
  19. Park, S.-Q., Y.-T. Shin, Y.-S. Ok, J.-B. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, B.-O. Park, M.-S. Jung, Y.-J. Park and J.-Y. Cho(1995) A Study on Developing Fishing Village Model by Combining Fishery, Fishing Port, Fishing Village. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  20. Pomeroy, A.(1990) Effect on agriculture of waterfront restructuring and need for shipping reform(No. 1/90). Discussion Paper.
  21. Seoguipo City(2011) 2011 Oceans and Fishery Condition of Seoguipo City.
  22. Song, M.-S. and I.-S. Chun(2003) A study on the effective port construction by remodeling. Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2003 (10): 5130-5135.
  23. Vayona, A.(2011) Investigating the preferences of individuals in redeveloping waterfronts: The case of the port of Thessaloniki-Greece. Cities 28(5): 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.05.007
  24. Wakefield, S.(2007) Great expectations: Waterfront redevelopment and the Hamilton Harbour Waterfront Trail. Cities 24(4): 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.11.001
  25. Walker, T. R., M. Bernier, B. Blotnicky, P. G. Golden, E. Hoffman, J. Janes and S. Vermeulen(2015) Harbour divestiture in Canada: Implications of changing governance. Marine Policy 62: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.018
  26. Wood, R. and J. Handley(1999) Urban waterfront regeneration in the Mersey Basin, North West England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(4): 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569911064