디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.69-78
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

팀상호작용과 팀메타인지가 대학생 학습공동체 지속참여에 미치는 융복합적 영향

A study about the convergent effects of team interaction and team metacognition affecting a continuous participation in learning community of university

  • Roh, Hye-Lan (Dept. of education, Seowon University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Na (Dept. of teaching profession, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.24
  • 심사 : 2016.04.20
  • 발행 : 2016.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 대학 학습공동체에 참여한 대학생들의 팀상호작용과 팀메타인지가 학습공동체 활동의 지속참여 의향에 어떠한 융복합적 영향을 주는가를 분석하기 위한 것이다. 팀상호작용 19개 문항과 팀메타인지 17개 문항으로 된 측정도구로, A 대학교 학습공동체 프로그램에 참여한 15개 팀 113명의 대학생을 대상으로 실시하였다. 이항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통하여 밝힌 연구 결과는 첫째, 학습공동체 지속참여 의향에 팀상호작용 수준과 팀메타인지 수준이 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 팀상호작용 수준이 높을수록, 팀메타인지 수준이 낮을수록 지속참여할 가능성이 증가하였다. 둘째, 학습공동체 지속참여 의향에 영향을 주는 팀상호작용 요인 중, 학습 횟수가 많을수록, 팀원들이 학습을 위해 서로 격려할수록 지속참여 가능성이 증가하였고, 팀원들이 열심히 활동하지 않을수록, 학습에 몰입하지 않을수록, 학습 시간이 적을수록 지속참여 가능성이 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 학습공동체 지속참여 의향에 영향을 주는 팀메타인지 요인 중, 학습 횟수가 많을수록 참여 의향 가능성이 증가하고, 다양한 학습도구를 사용할수록, 평균 학습시간이 많을수록 참여 의향 가능성이 감소하였다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 대학생의 학습공동체 지속참여를 위한 융복합적 지원 방안은 다음과 같다. 팀상호작용을 촉진하기 위해 학습 횟수를 늘리고, 팀원간 상호 격려하도록 지원하여 긍정적인 학습공동체 경험을 유도하고, 팀메타인지 활동의 필요성과 유용성을 학생들이 충분히 인식하도록 효과적인 활용 방법을 지원할 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze convergent effects of team interaction and team metacognition of participants on a continuous participation in the university learning community. We developed 19 items of team interaction and 17 items of team metacognition through literature review. The subjects were 113 students who participated in learning community in A university. The results are as follows. First, team interaction level and team metacognition level can affect a continuous participation in learning community. The higher team interaction is and the lower team metacognition is, the higher continuous participation is. Second, among team interaction factors that affect a continuous participation in learning community, the more number of learning is and the more encouragement of one another is, the higher continuous participation is. But the less participation of members is, the less flow to learning is, and the less learning time is, the lower a continuous participation is. Third, among team metacognition factors that affect a continuous participation in learning community, the more number of learning is, the higher continuous participation is. But the more use of various learning tools is and the more learning time is, the lower continuous participation is. Based on these results, the convergent ways of support for continuous participation in the university learning community are as follows. First, supporting system is needed to induce students to experience the positive atmosphere of learning community by increasing number of learning to facilitate team interaction and urging them to encourage one another. Second, providing the effective utilization method is necessary for students to fully acknowledge the necessity and value of team metacognition activity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yeom, M. H., Kim, H. J., "Understanding and Promoting Center for Teaching & Learning in Universities.", Korean Journal of educational research, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 219-248, 2008.
  2. Korean Association of Center for Teaching and Learning, "The result of CTL's present-condition investigation for sharing of CTL information", the report of KACTL, 2015.
  3. Lee, E. C., "A Study on the Development of Support Strategies by Investigating Factors for Study Group Activities in Universities", The Journal of Yeolin Education, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 351-374, 2013.
  4. Miller, R., "Creating Learning Communities: Models, Resources, and New Ways of Thinking About Teaching and Learning. Brandon", VT. The Foundation for Educational Renewal, Inc, 2000.
  5. Choi, M. N., Yoo, Y. M., "A case study on the Developmental Processes of CoP(Communities of Practice) as a Strategy for Creating and Sharing Knowledge", The Journal of Educational Information and Media, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 177-208, 2003.
  6. Na, S. I., Kim, J. W., Lee, K. Y., Ma, S. J., "Strategies for Establishing the Learning Community of Junior College", Journal of vocational education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 19-44, 2002.
  7. Kim, K. H., "A Study on Effects of the Collective Efficacy and Self-directed Learning Ability on Learning Satisfaction among Learning Communities Participating University Students", Korean journal of youth studies, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 315-335, 2013.
  8. Park, W. W., Paik, Y. J., "Negative effect of group-efficacy on group performance", Journal of korean academic society business administration, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 1427-1448, 2007.
  9. Jang, J. S., "The effects of metacognition supporting tool as computer supported collaborative learning scripts on metacognition and performance of team", An unpublished master's thesis. Hanyang University, 2010.
  10. Rho, H. R., Choi, M. N., "A Study on Predicting factors for Team-Metacognition Affecting Experience and Perception of Success in Learning community", Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 77-94, 2013
  11. Kim, E. J., "Verification of effects on a collaborative metacognition embedded in cooperative learning in computer studies", An unpublished Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education University , 2008.
  12. Kwon, S. H., Park, K. A., "The Effects of the Collaborative Metacognition Support on the Task Performance of Group and Learning Attitude in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning", The Journal of Educational Information and Media, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 193-219, 2004.
  13. Park, H. N., "The mediating effects of co-regulation on the relation between self-regulation, group cohesiveness and achievement", An unpublished Master's thesis. Ewha womans University, 2015.
  14. Saab, N., "Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Meta cognition and Learning", DOI:10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5, 2012.
  15. MaCarthy, A., Caravan, T., "Team Learning and Metacognition: Moving towards a collective unit of analysis", DOI: http://www.ufhrd.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uplo ads/2008/06/801-team-learning-and-metacognition _mccarthy.pdf, 2008.
  16. Mevarech, Z. R., "Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving", The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 92, No.(4), pp. 195-205, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597597
  17. Kim, E. Y., Kim, A. R., "A study on the educational meaning of learning community activities in college students: Focused on continuous participants of the Study group program", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 91-119, 2013.
  18. Park, S. H., "The Effectiveness of Learning Community for the Development of Convergence of University Students", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 29-37, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.29
  19. Berge, Z., "Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning", Educational Technology, Vol. 39, No, 1, pp. 5-11, 1999.
  20. Kim, Y. S., Kim, Y. H., Jung, Y. H., "The Effect of Levels of Learner Self-Direction on the Interaction and Satisfaction in the Web-Based Discussion Learning", Educational Technology International, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 174-182, 2000.
  21. Hornbeck, D. W., "Technology and student at risk of school failure. Education Policy and Telecommunication Technologies", (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327175), 1990.
  22. Hart, K. A., "Teaching thinking in college: Accent on improving college teaching and learning(NCRIPTAL)", MI: School of Education Building, The University of Michigan. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332613), 1990.
  23. May, S., "Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better", The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 7, No, 3, pp. 39-50, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526832
  24. Shin, N. M., "Introduce of Distance Education", Seoul: Seohyunsa, 2007.
  25. Volet, S. Summers, M., Thurman, J., "High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?", Learning and Instruction, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 128-143, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
  26. Kwon, E. M., "The Correlation among Team Efficacy, Interpersonal Understanding, Proactivity in Problem Solving and Team Performance", An unpublished master's thesis. Ewha womans University, 2010.
  27. Gama, C., "Metacognition in interactive learning environments: the reflection assistant model", In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicario, F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Proceedings 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004 (pp. 668-677). Berlin: Springer. DOI: http://www.ufhrd.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/801-team-learning-and-metacognition_mccarthy.pdf, 2005.
  28. Iiskala, T., Vauras M., Lehtinen, E., "Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning?", Hellenic Journal of Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 147-178, 2004.
  29. Kang, M. H., Song, Y. H., Park. S. H., "Relationships among Metacognition, Flow, Interactions and Problem Solving Ability in Web-based Problem Based Learning", Journal of Research of Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 293-315, 2008. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2008.12.2.293
  30. Wen, H., "The effects of task structure on group process and quality of group product in a cooperative project-based learning environment", An unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Florida State University, 1998.
  31. Won, Y. M., "A Study on Causes and modification of the Pseudo-Conceptual and the Pseudo-Analytical thought ProcessesinMathematicalLearning", An unpublished master's thesis. Ewha womans University, 2007.
  32. Lee, N. J., Back, S. H., "The Effects of Scientific Program for Gifted Elementary Students using Metacognition on Learning-flow and Lingual Interaction", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 415-422, 2013.
  33. Lee, J. M., Yoon, S. H., Roo, H. S., "Identifying Predictability of Team Efficacy, Metacognition on PBL(Problem-Based Learning) Outcomes", Asian journal of education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 105-123, 2012. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2012.13.1.005
  34. Park, K. A., "The Effects of the collaborative metacognition support on the task performance of group and learning attitude in computer supported collaborative learning", An unpublished master's thesis. Hanyang University, 2002
  35. Kang, M. H., Um, S. Y., Lee, J. M., "The effect of learner's traits and interactions on web-based collaborative learning outcomes", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 53-79, 2010.