DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CAD/CAM 맞춤형 지대주를 이용한 milled-bar 피개의치 증례

Rehabilitation of edentulous maxilla with implant-supported milled bar overdenture using CAD/CAM customized abutment: A case report

  • 지운 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 장재승 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 권주현 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김선재 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Ji, Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chang, Jae-Seung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwon, Joo-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Sunjai (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.06
  • 심사 : 2015.09.02
  • 발행 : 2016.04.29

초록

상악 완전 무치악에 6개 이상의 임플란트가 식립된 경우 임플란트-지지형 피개의치 제작이 가능하다. 임플란트-지지 피개의치에 사용되는 다양한 부착장치 중에 milled-bar의 경우 의치의 회전을 허용하지 않고, 안정성이 뛰어나며, 여러 개의 임플란트를 연결 고정하는 효과를 가진다는 장점이 있다. 본 증례에서는 전치부에 심한 골소실을 동반한 상악 완전 무치악 환자에서 세 가지 다른 시스템으로 구성된 7개의 임플란트 상부에 CAD/CAM 맞춤형 지대주와 시멘트 접착형의 milled bar를 이용한 피개의치를 제작하여 상실된 심미와 기능을 효과적으로 회복하였다.

In patients with fully edentulous maxilla, fabrication of implant-supported overdenture can be a viable treatment option, when a minimum of six implants were strategically placed. Among several attachment systems used for implant-supported overdentures, milled-bars prevent rotational movement of denture, thus showing great stability, and have the advantage of splinting multiple implants with each other. In this case report, a milled-bar supported overdenture was fabricated for a patient suffering from condition of fully edentulous maxilla with severe ridge resorption in the anterior residual ridge. Seven implants composed of three different systems were effectively utilized by CAD/CAM customized abutment and cement-retained milled bar.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1455-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0073
  2. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x
  3. Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:176-85.
  4. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  5. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:987-94.
  6. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert SE, Fenton AH, Jacob RF, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete dentures and implant-supported prestheses. 12th ed. Mosby; 2004.
  7. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1