DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Outcome of a Precontoured Symphysis Pubis Plate with Tension Band Wiring for Traumatic Symphysis Pubis Rupture in Pelvic Fractures

  • 투고 : 2015.12.24
  • 심사 : 2016.01.04
  • 발행 : 2016.03.31

초록

Purpose: The optimal method of fixation of symphysis pubis (SP) diastasis in pelvic ring injuries is still controversial. In this study, we investigated the radiological and the clinical results of a precontoured 4.5-mm symphysis pubis (SP) plate with tension band wiring (TBW) after an anterior pelvic injury in pelvic fractures. Methods: We treated 25 patients with traumatic SP diastasis by open reduction and internal fixation with plates and wires. We used a four-hole 4.5-mm precontoured SP plate with a tension band wiring. Results: Patients with a SP with TBW fixation achieved excellent or good results at final follow-up. Post-operative complications included two (8%) patients with metal work movement. The mean symphyseal width was smaller in 4.5 mm SP plate with TBW during 1-year follow up period. Conclusion: A precontoured symphysis pubis plate (4.5 mm) with figure-of-eight fashion tension band wiring shows favorable radiological results, excellent or good clinical outcome, and a lower complication (hardware failure and revision surgery).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Putnis SE, Pearce R, Wali UJ, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of a traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis: one-year radiological and functional outcomes. J Bone Jt. Surg Br 2011; 93: 78-84.
  2. Yang NP, Chan CL, Yu IL, et al. Estimated prevalence of orthopaedic fractures in Taiwan--A cross-sectional study based on nationwide insurance data. Injury 2010; 41: 1266-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.025
  3. Varga E, Hearn T, Powell J, et al. Effects of method of internal fixation of symphyseal disruptions on stability of the pelvic ring. Injury 1995; 26: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)92180-I
  4. Waikakul S, Soparat K, Harnroongroj T. Anterior stabilization in the pubic symphysis separation: a mechanical testing. J Med Assoc Thai 1999; 82: 72-9.
  5. Chen L, Zhang G, Song D, et al. A comparison of percutaneous reduction and screw fixation versus open reduction and plate fixation of traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132: 265-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1414-2
  6. Mason WT, Khan SN, James CL, et al. Complications of temporary and definitive external fixation of pelvic ring injuries. Injury 2005; 36: 599-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.016
  7. Rommens PM, Vanderschot PM, De Boodt P, et al. Surgical management of pelvic ring disruptions. Indications, techniques and functional results. Unfallchirurg 1992; 95: 455-62.
  8. Lange RH, Hansen ST Jr. Pelvic ring disruptions with symphysis pubis diastasis. Indications, technique, and limitations of anterior internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 201: 130-7.
  9. Giannoudis PV, Chalidis BE, Roberts CS. Internal fixation of traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: is plate removal essential? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128: 325-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0429-1
  10. Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 329: 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00011
  11. Sagi HC, Papp S. Comparative radiographic and clinical outcome of two-hole and multi-hole symphyseal plating. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 373-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817e49ee
  12. Webb LX, Gristina AG, Wilson JR, et al. Two-hole plate fixation for traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis. J Trauma 1988; 28: 813-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198806000-00016
  13. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21: S1-133. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318030dfd2
  14. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Jt. Surg Br 1989; 71: 304-6.
  15. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, et al. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Jt. Surg Br 1999 ; 81: 955-62. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B6.0810955
  16. Tucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, et al. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma 2000; 49: 989-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200012000-00002
  17. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Outcome of operatively treated type-C injuries of the pelvic ring. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 667-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041754
  18. Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr, Harrington RM, et al. Anterior versus posterior provisional fixation in the unstable pelvis. A biomechanical comparison. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 310: 245-51.
  19. Garcia JM, Doblare M, Seral B, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvis fixations. J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 516-22. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1289995
  20. Simonian PT, Schwappach JR, Routt ML Jr, et al. Evaluation of new plate designs for symphysis pubis internal fixation. J Trauma 1996; 41: 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199609000-00019
  21. Oh CW, Kim PT, Kim JW, et al. Anterior plating and percutaneous iliosacral screwing in an unstable pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 107-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1201-7

피인용 문헌

  1. Is there a clinical benefit of additional tension band wiring in plate fixation of the symphysis? vol.18, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1418-3