수산해양교육연구 (Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.384-390
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-8999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2049(eISSN)
한국수산해양교육학회 (The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제주 연안에서 양식된 참조기의 청각 능력

Hearing Ability of Redlip croaker Pseudosciaena polyactis cultured in the Coastal Sea of Jeju

  • 투고 : 2015.12.16
  • 심사 : 2016.01.29
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this paper is to improve the availability of underwater sound by the fundamental data on the hearing ability of Redlip croaker Pseudosciaena polyactis, which is cultured according to the cultivation technology, recently. The auditory thresholds of Redlip croaker were determined at 6 frequencies from 80Hz to 800Hz by heartbeat conditioning method using pure tones coupled with a delayed electric shock. The audible range of the Redlip croaker extended from 80Hz to 800Hz with the best sensitive frequency range including little difference in hearing ability from 80Hz to 500Hz. In addition, the auditory thresholds over 800Hz increased rapidly. The mean auditory thresholds of the Redlip croaker at the test frequencies from 80Hz to 800Hz were 90.7dB, 93.4dB, 92.9dB, 94.4dB, 95.5dB and 108dB, respectively. Auditory masking for the redlip croaker was measured using masking stimuli with the spectrum level range of about 66, 71, 75dB (0dB re $1{\mu}Pa/{\sqrt{Hz}}$). According to white noise level, the auditory thresholds increased as compared with thresholds in a quiet background noise. The Auditory masking by the white noise spectrum level was stared over about 70dB within 80~500Hz. Critical ratio ranged from minimum 20.7dB to maximum 25.5dB at test frequencies of 80Hz~500Hz.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, J. Y. and LEE, C. H.(2013). Hearing Ability of Sharp Toothed eel Muraenesox cinereus caught in the southern korean waters, JFMSE, 25(2), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2013.25.2.341
  2. Chapman. C. J. and O. sand.(1974). A field study of hearing in two species of flatfish, Pleuronectes platessa(L) and Limanda limanda(L). Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 47, 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(74)90082-6
  3. Choi. T. H..J. H. Kim..H. L. Song. and C. S. Ko.(2015) Suggestion of Safety Level in Fish Farming by Impulsive Sound. Tunnel & Underground space. 25(2). 125-132. https://doi.org/10.7474/TUS.2015.25.2.125
  4. Fish, M. P. and W. H. Moubray.(1970). Sounds of Western North Atlantic fishes, A reference file of biological underwater sounds. The Johns Hopkins Press., 102-110.
  5. Fujieda. S..Matsuno. Y. and Yamanaka. Y.(1996) The auditory threshold of the Bastard Halibut Paralichthys olivaceus. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 62, 201-204. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.62.201
  6. Hatakeyama, Y.(1989). Masking effect on the hearing of red sea bream, Pagrus major, by ambient noise, Int. J. Aq. Fish. Technol., 1, 271-277.
  7. Hatakeyama, Y.(1992). The hearing abilities of fish, Fisheries Engineering, 28, 111-119.
  8. Ishioka, H..Hatakeyama, Y. and Sakaguchi, S.(1988). The hearing ability of the red sea bream Pagrus major, Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 54, 947-951. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.54.947
  9. Kim, S. H..Lee, C. H..Seo, D. O. and Kim, Y. J.(2002). A basic study on acoustic conditioning of fish suitable for a marine ranch, 1. The sound sensitivity of of japanese parrot fish Oplegnathus fasciatus, J. Korean Fish. Soc. 35(6), 563-567.
  10. Kojima, T..Shimamura, T..Yoza, K..Okumoto, N..Hatakeyama, Y. and Soeda, H.(1992). W-shaped auditory threshold curves of masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou, Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 58(8), 1447-1452. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.58.1447
  11. Kojima. T..Kitamura. S..Ikuta. K..Sugiyama. Y..Yoza. K. and Soeda. H.(1996). Changes in Auditory Capability of Masu Salmon by Swimbladder Resonance of Rainbow Trout. Fisheries Science 62(1), 146-147. https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.62.146
  12. LEE, K. H..Y. S. YANG.J. K. KIM.H. C. AN and J. K. SHIN.(2007). Characterization of sounds produced by 3 sciaenid species J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 43(3), 206-211. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2007.43.3.206
  13. Park, Y. S..Iida, K. and Nashimoto, K.(1995). Ratio of auditory threshold levels to artificial background noise spectrum levels in walleye pollock Theragra chalcogramma, Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 61(6), 847-853. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.61.847
  14. Schellart. N. A. M. and A. N. Popper(1992). Functional aspects of the evolution of the auditory system of actinopterygian fish, in The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing., Springer-Verlag, New York, Tokyo, 295-322.
  15. Seo, Y. J..Kim, S. H..Kim, B. Y..Lee, C. H. and Seo, D. O.(2003). A fundamental study on the auditory characteristics of Amberjack seriola dumerili in the coast of jeju island, Bull. Korean Soc. Fish. Tech., 39(4), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2003.39.4.269