DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural behavior of partially encased composite columns under axial loads

  • Pereira, Margot F. (Department of Structural Engineering, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • De Nardin, Silvana (Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Sao Carlos) ;
  • El Debs, Ana L.H.C. (Department of Structural Engineering, University of Sao Paulo)
  • Received : 2015.09.01
  • Accepted : 2016.02.16
  • Published : 2016.04.30

Abstract

This paper presents the results of experimental and numerical model analyses on partially encased composite columns under concentric loads. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of replacing the conventional longitudinal and transverse steel bars by welded wire mesh on the structural behavior of these members under concentric loads. To achieve these goals experimental tests on four specimens of partially encased composite columns submitted to axial loading were performed and the results were promising in terms of replacing the traditional reinforcement by steel meshes. In addition, a numerical FE model was developed using the software DIANA$^{(R)}$ with FX+. The experimental results were used to validate the numerical model. Satisfactory agreement between experimental and numerical results was observed in both capacity and deformability of the composite columns. Despite of the simplifying assumptions of perfect bond between steel and concrete, the numerical model adequately represented the columns behavior. A finite element parametric study was performed and parameters including thickness of the steel profile and the concrete and steel strengths were evaluated. The parametrical study results found no significant changes in the partially encased columns behavior due to variations of the steel profile thickness or yield strength. However, significant changes in the post peak behavior were observed when using high strength concrete and these results suggest a change in the failure mode.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Sao Paulo State Research Support Foundation (FAPESP)

References

  1. ABNT NBR 5738 (1994), NBR 5738: Concrete-Procedure for molding and curing the coupons, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. [In Portuguese]
  2. ABNT NBR 8800 (2008), NBR 8800: Design and execution of steel concrete composite building structures: Procedures, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. [In Portuguese]
  3. Ali, S. and Begum, M. (2011), "Behavior of partially encased slender composite columns in eccentric loading", Proceedings of the 4th Annual Paper Meet and the 1st Civil Engineering Congress, Dhaka, Bangladesh, December, pp. 251-260.
  4. Ali, S. and Begum, M. (2013), "Load-moment interaction diagrams of slender partially encased composite columns", Malay. J. Civil Eng., 25(2), 254-266.
  5. ASTM A370 (2005), ASTM A370: Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products, American Society for Testing and Materials.
  6. Begum, M. and Gosh, D. (2014), "Simulations of PEC columns with equivalent steel section under gravity loading", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(3), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.3.305
  7. Begum, M., Driver, R.G. and Elwi, A.E. (2007), "Finite-element modeling of partially encased composite columns using the dynamic explicit method", J. Struct. Eng., 133(3), 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:3(326)
  8. Begum, M., Driver, R.G. and Elwi, A.E. (2013), "Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete", Eng. Struct., 56, 1718-1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.040
  9. CEN (2004), ENV 1994-1-1: Design of composite steel and concrete structures-Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Chen, Y., Wang, T., Yang, J. and Zhao, X. (2010), "Test and numerical simulation of partially encased composite columns subject to axial and cyclic horizontal loads", Int. J. Steel Struct., 10(4), 385-393.
  11. Chicoine, T., Tremblay, R., Massicotte, B., Ricles, J.M. and Lu, L. (2002a), "Behavior and Strength of partially encased composite columns with built-up shapes", J. Struct. Eng., 128(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:3(279)
  12. Chicoine, T., Tremblay, R. and Massicotte, B. (2002b), "Finite element modeling and design of partially encased composite columns", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 2(3), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2002.2.3.171
  13. Chicoine, T., Tremblay, R. and Massicotte, B. (2003), "Long-term behavior and strength of partially encased composite columns made with built-up steel shapes", J. Struct. Eng., 129(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(141)
  14. Dasfan, M. and Driver, R. (2015), "Large-scale test of a modular steel plate shear wall with partially encased composite columns", J. Struct. Eng., 141(10), 04015142.
  15. De Nardin, S. and El Debs, A.H.C. (2007), "Shear transfer mechanisms in composite columns: an experimental study", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 7(5), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.5.377
  16. Diana Manual (2014), DIANA finite element analysis: User's manual release 9, Material library; Delft, The Netherland.
  17. Hunaiti, Y.M. and Fattah, B.A. (1994), "Design considerations of partially composite columns", Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Struct. Build., 106(2), 75-82.
  18. Kim, C-S., Park, H-G., Chung, K-S. and Choi, I-D. (2012), "Eccentric axial load testing for concreteencased steel columns using 800 MPa steel and 100 MPa concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 138(8), 1019-1031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000533
  19. Neville, A.M. (1995), Properties of Concrete, (4th Ed.), Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
  20. Oh, M.H., Ju, Y.K., Kim, M.H. and Kim, S.D. (2006), "Structural performance of steel-concrete composite column subjected to axial and flexural loading", J. Asian Architect. Build. Eng., 5(1), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.5.153
  21. Pereira, M.F. (2014), "Experimental and numerical analysis of partially encased composite columns", Thesis (Master Degree); University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, Brazil. [In Portuguese]
  22. Prickett, B.S. and Driver, R.G. (2006), "Behavior of partially encased columns made with high performance concrete", Structural Engineering Report (n. 262); Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  23. Tremblay, R., Massicotte, B., Filion, I. and Maranda, R. (1998), "Experimental study on the behavior of partially encased composite columns made with light welded H steel shapes under compressive axial loads", Proceedings of Annual Technical Session, Structural Stability Research Council, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 195-204.
  24. Tremblay, R., Chicoine, T. and Massicotte, B. (2002), "Design equation for the capacity of partially encased non-columns", Proceedings of Composite Construction in steel and concrete IV, ASCE, Reston, VA, USA, pp. 506-517.
  25. Uy, B. (2001), "Local and postlocal buckling of fabricated steel and composite cross sections", J. Struct. Eng., 127(6), 666-677. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:6(666)
  26. Vincent, R. and Tremblay, R. (2000), "Design and application of partially encased non-compact composite columns for high-rise buildings", Proceeding of Composite Construction IV, Banff, AB, Canada, May, pp. 854-864.
  27. Vincent, R. and Tremblay, R. (2001), "An innovative partially composite column system for high-rise buildings", Proceedings of North American Steel Construction Conference, Fort Lauderlade, FL, USA.

Cited by

  1. Numerical Study and Design Recommendations of Eccentrically Loaded Partially Encased Composite Columns pp.2093-6311, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0179-7
  2. Behavior of partially encased composite members under various load conditions: Experimental and analytical models pp.2048-4011, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218778725
  3. Equalizing Octagonal PEC Columns with Steel Columns: Experimental and Theoretical Study vol.23, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000375
  4. Beam-column connections of concrete-filled double steel tubular frame structures pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1592
  5. Structural response of rectangular composite columns under vertical and lateral loads vol.25, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.3.287
  6. Experimental investigation on shear capacity of partially prefabricated steel reinforced concrete columns vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.1.073
  7. Progressive collapse resistance of a composite steel and concrete structural frame vol.172, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00149
  8. Experimental behavior of VHSC encased composite stub column under compression and end moment vol.31, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.1.069
  9. Partially encased composite columns using fiber reinforced concrete: experimental study vol.34, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.909
  10. Simplified relations for confinement factors of partially and highly confined areas of concrete in partially encased composite columns vol.208, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110303
  11. Behaviour of engineered cementitious composite-encased stub concrete columns under axial compression vol.72, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.19.00111
  12. Compressive behaviour of ECC confined concrete partially encased steel composite columns using high strength steel vol.265, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120783
  13. Flexural behavior of partially prefabricated partially encased composite beams vol.38, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.38.6.705
  14. Experimental Study on Load Bearing Capacity of Prefabricated Partially Encased Composite Beams vol.21, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455421501042