Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear analysis of RC structure with massive infill wall exposed to shake table

  • Onat, Onur (Department of Civil Engineering, Tunceli University) ;
  • Lourenco, Paulo B. (ISISE, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho) ;
  • Kocak, Ali (Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University)
  • Received : 2015.09.03
  • Accepted : 2015.12.23
  • Published : 2016.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to present nonlinear time history analysis results of double leaf cavity wall (DLCW) reinforced concrete structure exposed to shake table tests. Simulation of the model was done by a Finite Element (FE) program. Shake table experiment was performed at the National Civil Engineering Laboratory in Lisbon, Portugal. The results of the experiment were compared with numeric DLCW model and numeric model of reinforced concrete structure with unreinforced masonry wall (URM). Both DLCW and URM models have two bays and two stories. Dimensions of the tested structure and finite element models are 1:1.5 scaled according to Cauchy Froude similitude law. The URM model has no experimental results but the purpose is to compare their performance level with the DLCW model. Results of the analysis were compared with experimental response and were evaluated according to ASCE/SEI 41-06 code.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Building: ASCE SEI 41/06, American Society of Civil Engineers, USA.
  2. CEB-FIB Model Code 2010 (2012), "CEB-FIB Model Code 2010-Final draft volume 1", Comite Euro-International du Beton.
  3. Epackachi, S., Mirghaderi, R., Esmaili, O., Behbahani, A.A.T. and Vahdani, S. (2012), "Seismic evaluation of a 56-story residential reinforced concrete high-rise building based on nonlinear dynamic time history analysis", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 21(4), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.586
  4. Ersoy, U. and Uzsoy, S. (1971), The Behavior and Strength of Infilled Frame, TUBITAK MAG-205 Technical Report, Ankara.
  5. Flaganan, R.D. and Bennett, R.M. (1999), "Bidirectional behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 125(3), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:3(236)
  6. Hashemi, A. and Mosalam, K.M. (2006), "Shake table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(14), 1827-1852. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.612
  7. http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/202/Earthquake-M7-2-Eastern-Turkey, CSEM, EMCS, 03.04.2015
  8. Ile, N., Nguyen, X-H., Kotronis, P., Mazars, J. and Reynouard, J.M. (2008), "Shaking table tests of light rc walls: numeric simulations", J. Earthq. Eng., ASCE, 12(6), 849-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801890430
  9. Kakaletsis, D. and Karayannis, C. (2007), "Experimental investigation of infilled r/c frames with eccentric openings", Struc. Eng. Mech., 26(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.26.3.231
  10. Kizilkanat, A., Cosar, A., Kocak, A., Guney, D., Selcuk, M.E. and Yildirim, M. (2011), 23 October 2011 Van Earthquake Technical Investigation Report, Yildiz Technical University Press.
  11. Krawlinker, H. (2006), "Importance of good nonlinear analysis", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 15(5), 515-531. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.379
  12. Leite, J. (2014), "Design of masonry walls for building enclosures subjected to extreme actions", Ph.D. Thesis, Minho University, Portugal.
  13. Liauw, T.C. and Kwan, A.K.H. (1992), "Experimental study of shear wall and infilled frame on shake table", Earthquake Engineering 10th World Conference, Balkema, Rotterdam.
  14. Lourenco, P.B. and Rots, J.G. (1997), "A multi-surface interface model for the analysis of masonry structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123(7), 660-668. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(660)
  15. Lourenco, P.B., Rots, J.G. and Blaauwendraad, J. (1998), "Continuum model for masonry: parameter estimation and validation", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 124(6), 642-652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:6(642)
  16. Mehrabi, A.B., Shing, P.B., Schuller, M.P. and Noland, J.L. (1997), "Experimental evaluation of masonryinfilled rc frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(3), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228)
  17. Ministry of Environment and Urbanism, (1996), Turkey Earthquake Map.
  18. Onat, O. (2015), "Investigation of seismic behavior of infill wall surrounded by reinforced concrete frame", Ph.D. Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  19. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2015), "Experimental and numerical analysis of RC structure with two leaf cavity wall subjected to shake table", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(5), 1037-1053. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.1037
  20. Pereira, M.F.P. (2013), "Avalidacao do desempenho das envolventes dos edificios face a accao dos sismos", Ph.D. Thesis, Minho University, Portugal.
  21. Sayin, E., Yon, B., Calayir, Y. and Gor, M. (2014), "Construction failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.503
  22. Selby, R.G. and Vecchio, F.J. (1993), "Three-dimensional constitutive relations for reinforced concrete", Technical Report 93-02, University of Toronto, Department of Civil Engineering, Toronto, Canada.
  23. Shing, B. and Mehrabi, A.B. (2002), "Behavior and analysis of masonry infilled frames", Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 4(3), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.122
  24. TNO (2012), Displacement method Analyser, User's manual, Release 9.4.4, Netherlands.
  25. Toranzo, L.A., Restrepo, J.I., Mander, J.B. and Carr, A.J. (2009), "Shake table test of confined-masonry rocking walls with supplementary hysteric damping", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(6), 882-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802715040
  26. Vechio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1986), "The modified compression filed theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear", ACI J., 83(22), 219-231.
  27. Yon, B., Sayin, E., Calayir, Y., Ulucan, Z.C., Karatas, M., Sahin, H., Alyamac, K.E. and Bildik, A.T. (2015), "Lessons and learned from recent destructive Van, Turkey earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.431
  28. Yon, B., Sayin, E. and Koksal, T.S., (2013), "Seismic response of the buildings during the May 19, 2011 Simav, Turkey earthquake", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.343
  29. Zijl, V.G.P.A.G. (2000), "Computational modeling of masonry creep and shrinkage", Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.

Cited by

  1. An artificial neural network-based earthquake casualty estimation model for Istanbul city vol.84, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2541-4
  2. Assessment of the combined in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of brick infill walls within reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading vol.47, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3111
  3. Assessment of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses for RC structures vol.18, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.18.6.1195
  4. Shear stress indicator to predict seismic performance of residential RC buildings vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.283
  5. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the prediction of out-of-plane response of infill walls subjected to shake table vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.4.521
  6. Experimental damage evaluation of prototype infill wall based on forced vibration test vol.8, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2019.8.2.077
  7. Parametric nonlinear static analysis of a RC structure with TLCW exposed to bidirectional earthquake load by using different modelling methodologies vol.44, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103395