Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of seismic performance factors for steel DIAGRID structural system design

  • Lee, Dongkyu (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Shin, Soomi (Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ju, Youngkyu (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2014.06.06
  • Accepted : 2015.12.03
  • Published : 2016.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This article presents a proposed analytical methodology to determine seismic force-resisting system R-values for steel diagrid framed systems. As current model building codes do not explicitly address the seismic design performance factors for this new and emerging structural system, the purpose of this study is to provide a sound and reliable basis for defining such seismic design parameters. An approach and methodology for the reliable determination of seismic performance factors for use in the design of steel diagrid framed structural systems is proposed. The recommended methodology is based on current state-of-the-art and state-of-the practice methods including structural nonlinear dynamic analysis techniques, testing data requirements, building code design procedures and earthquake ground motion characterization. In determining appropriate seismic performance factors (R, ${\Omega}_O$, $C_d$) for new archetypical building structural systems, the methodology defines acceptably low values of probability against collapse under maximum considered earthquake ground shaking.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References

  1. AISC 341 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-05), including Supplement No. 1 (ANSI/AISC 341s1-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  2. AISC 341-05 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-05) including Supplement No. 1 (ANSI/AISC 341s1-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
  3. AISC 360 (2005), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  4. AISC 360-05 (2005), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
  5. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2007), Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters-ATC-63 (75% Draft), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  6. ASCE 7-05 (2005), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-05), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  7. ATC-63 (2007), Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters (75% Draft), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  8. Black, G.R., Wenger, B.A. and Popov, E.P. (1980), Inelastic buckling of steel struts under cyclic load reversals, Technical Report UCB/EERC-80/40, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
  9. Chen, L. (2011), Innovative bracing system for earthquake resistant concentrically braced frame structures, Master Thesis Report, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  10. Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) (1978-2006), SAP2000-Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three Dimensional Structures-Software v. 11, Berkeley, CA.
  11. Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) (2007), Perform3D-Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures-Software v. 4.0.3, Berkeley, CA.
  12. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2000), ETABS Tutorial, Berkely, California, USA.
  13. Deierlein, G.G., Liel, A.B., Haselton, C.B. and Kircher, C.A. (2007), Assessing Building System Collapse Performance and Associated Requirements for Seismic Design, Proceedings SEAOC 2007 Convention, Squaw Creek, CA.
  14. Di Sarno, L. and Elnashai, A.S. (2009), "Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(2), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.013
  15. Dorvash, S., Pakzad, S., Naito, C., Hodgson, I. and Yen, B. (2013), "Application of state-of-the-art in measurement and data analysis techniques for vibration evaluation of a tall building", Struct. Infra. Eng., doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.757795.
  16. Dougka, G., Dimakogianni, D. and Vayas, I. (2014), "Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS 1-1)", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.1.001
  17. Elnashai, A.S. and Di Sarno, L. (2008), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Wiley.
  18. Fajfar, P. (2005), Structural analysis in earthquake engineering-a breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods, 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper Reference 843.
  19. FEMA-355C (2000). State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, Program to Reduce the Earthquake Hazards of Steel Moment-Frame Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  20. FEMA-450 (2003), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  21. Hejazi, F., Toloue, I., Noorzaei, J. and Jaafar, M.S. (2013), "Optimization of earthquake energy dissipation system by genetic algorithm", Comput. Aid. Civ. Infra. Eng., 28(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00759.x
  22. IBC 2006 (2006), International Building Code 2006, International Code Council.
  23. Jiang, X. and Adeli, H. (2008), "Neuro-genetic algorithm for nonlinear active control of highrise buildings", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 75(8), 770-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2274
  24. Kircher, C.A. and Heintz, J.A. (2008), Overview and key concepts of the ATC-63 methodology, Proceedings of ASCE-SEI Structures Congress, Vancouver, B.C.
  25. Lee, D.K., Kim, J.H., Starossek, U. and Shin, S.S. (2012), "Evaluation of structural outrigger belt truss layouts for tall buildings by using topology optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 43(6), 711-724. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.6.711
  26. Lee, D.K., Park, S.S. and Shin S.M. (2008), "Non-stochastic interval arithmetic-based finite element analysis for structural uncertainty response estimate", Struct. Eng. Mech., 29(5), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.29.5.469
  27. Lee, D.K., Lee, J.H., Kim, J.H. and Srarossek, Uwe (2014a), "Investigation on material layouts of structural diagrid frames by using topology optimization", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 18(2), 549-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0107-0
  28. Lee, D.K., Ha, T.H., Jung, M.Y. and Kim, J.H. (2014b), "Evaluating high performance steel tube-framed diagrid for high-rise buildings", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(3), 289-303 https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.3.289
  29. Mele, E., Toreno, M., Brandonisio, G. and Luca, A.D. (2012), "Diagrid structures for tall buildings: case studies and design considerations", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tal), doi:10.1002/tal.1029.
  30. Moon, K.S., Connor, J.J. and Fernandez, J.E. (2007), "Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: characteristics and methodology for preliminary design", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 16(2), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.311
  31. Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I. (2010), "Seismic safety of network structures and infrastructures", Struct. Infra. Eng., 6(1-2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663813
  32. Oosterhuis, K. and Biloria, N. (2008), "Interactions with proactive architectural spaces: the muscle projects", Comm. ACM, 51(6), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349026.1349041
  33. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (2006), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (Opensees), http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
  34. Petrini, F. and Ciampoli, M. (2012), "Performance-based wind design of tall buildings", Struct. Infra. Eng., 8(10), 954-966.
  35. Sarma, K.C. and Adeli, H. (2002), "Life-cycle cost optimization of steel structures", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 55(12), 1451-1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.549
  36. Uriz, P. and Mahin, S.A. (2008), Toward earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures, PEER 2008/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  37. Winter, U.M. (2011), Super high-rise in Rotterdam, Master Thesis Report, Delft University of Technology.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Seismic Performance Factors for High-rise Steel Structures with Diagrid System vol.23, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1546-4