DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlations between HER2 Expression and Other Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Inverse Relations with the Ki-67 Index and P53 Status

  • Payandeh, Mehrdad (Cancer Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Shahriari-Ahmadi, Ali (Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Hematology and Medical Oncology Ward, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sadeghi, Masoud (Cancer Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sadeghi, Edris (Cancer Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences)
  • Published : 2016.04.11

Abstract

Background: Overexpression or amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is associated with grade of malignancy and a poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC). The aim of this study was to evaluate of value of HER2 as a prognostic marker, and to analyze associations with common histopathological parameters in BC cases. Materials and Methods: Between of 2007 to 2014, 260 patients with BC referred to Oncology Clinic provided cancer tissue samples which underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) for markers. ER and PR positivity was defined as ${\geq}10%$ positive tumor cells with nuclear staining. HER2-positive was defined as either HER2 gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or scored as 3+ by IHC. For HER2 (2+), FISH was performed to determine HER2 positivity. Results: The mean age at diagnosis for the patients with HER2-negative was significantly higher than in HER2-positive cases. Also, there were significant correlations between histological grade, nuclear grade, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, ER status, PR status, p53 overexpression and Ki-67 index with HER2 expression. HER2-negative lesions were of higher grade and more likely to be ER-negative, PR-negative, p53-positive, lymph node metastasis, with a tumor size<2cm and also $Ki-67{\geq}20%$ as compared to the HER2-positive group. Conclusions: Contrary to the results of other studies, HER2-positive tumors in our study had a lower Ki-67 index and were p53-positive. Also, Ki-67 proliferation index ${\geq}20%$ in more studies was associated with p53-positive.Therefore, tumors which are HER2-positive and have a Ki-$67{\geq}20%$ had a more aggressive behavior compared to HER2-positive and Ki-67<20% lesions.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadi AS, Mahdipour L, Payandeh M, et al (2015). Epidemiology, pathology and histochemistry features in women with breast cancer. Am J Cancer Prev, 3, 54-7.
  2. Camerini A, Donati S, Viacava P, et al (2011). Evaluation of HER2 and p53 expression in predicting response to docetaxel-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 30, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-30-38
  3. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al (2006). Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA, 295, 2492-502. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.21.2492
  4. el AT, Khalifa A, Kamel AS (2000). Immunohistochemical expression of p53 and c-erbB2 proteins in breast cancer in Egypt. Anticancer Res, 20, 2145-50.
  5. Fountzilas G, Valavanis C, Kotoula V, et al (2012). HER2 and TOP2A in high-risk early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant epirubicin-based dose-dense sequential chemotherapy. J Transl Med, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-10
  6. Haroon S, Hashmi AA, Khurshid A, et al (2013). Ki67 index in breast cancer: correlation with other prognostic markers and potential in Pakistani patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 4353-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4353
  7. Hayashi N, Niikura N, Masuda N, et al (2015). Prognostic factors of HER2-positive breast cancer patients who develop brain metastasis: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 149, 277-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3237-7
  8. Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstadter F, et al (2013). Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 139, 539-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2560-8
  9. Kai K, Nishimura R, Arima N, et al (2006). p53 expression status is a significant molecular marker in predicting the time to endocrine therapy failure in recurrent breast cancer: a cohort study. Int J Clin Oncol, 11, 426-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-006-0601-6
  10. Lee DS, Kim SH, Suh YJ, et al (2011). Clinical implication of p53 overexpression in breast cancer patients younger than 50 years with a triple-negative subtype who undergo a modified radical mastectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 41, 854-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr066
  11. Li FY, Wu SG, Zhou J, et al (2014). Prognostic value of Ki-67 in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One, 9, 87264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087264
  12. Menard S, Fortis S, Castiglioni F, et al (2001). HER2 as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Oncol, 61, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000055404
  13. Nishimura R, Osako T, Okumura Y, et al (2010). Ki-67 as a prognostic marker according to breast cancer subtype and a predictor of recurrence time in primary breast cancer. Exp Ther Med, 1, 747-54. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2010.133
  14. Patnayak R, Jena A, Rukmangadha N, et al (2015). Hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), human epidermal growth factor-2 and p53 in South Indian breast cancer patients: A tertiary care center experience. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol, 36, 117-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.158844
  15. Payandeh M, Khodarahmi R, Sadeghi M, et al (2015a). Appearance of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in a patient with breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: case report and review of the literature. Iran J Cancer Prev, 8, 125-8.
  16. Payandeh M, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi E, et al (2015b). Clinicopathology figures and long-term effects of tamoxifen plus radiation on survival of women with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple negative breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 4863-7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.12.4863
  17. Shokouh TZ, Ezatollah A, Barand P (2015). Interrelationships Between Ki67, HER2/neu, p53, ER, and PR status and their associations with tumor grade and lymph node involvement in breast carcinoma subtypes: retrospective-observational analytical study. Med (Baltimore), 94, 1359. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001359
  18. Swede H, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL, et al (2001). Breast cancer risk factors and HER2 over-expression in tumors. Cancer Detect Prev, 25, 511-9.
  19. Wiesner FG, Magener A, Fasching PA, (2009). Ki-67 as a prognostic molecular marker in routine clinical use in breast cancer patients. Breast, 18, 135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.009
  20. Yamamoto M, Hosoda M, Nakano K, et al (2014). p53 accumulation is a strong predictor of recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors. Cancer Sci, 105, 81-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12302
  21. Yarden Y (2001). Biology of HER2 and its importance in breast cancer. Oncol, 61, 1-13.

Cited by

  1. Machine learning approaches to decipher hormone and HER2 receptor status phenotypes in breast cancer pp.1477-4054, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx138
  2. Limited utility of tissue micro-arrays in detecting intra-tumoral heterogeneity in stem cell characteristics and tumor progression markers in breast cancer vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1495-6
  3. HER2 overexpression and correlation with other significant clinicopathologic parameters in Ivorian breast cancer women vol.19, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0081-4
  4. Correlation Between HER-2 Gene Amplification or Protein Expression and Clinical Pathological Features of Breast Cancer vol.34, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2018.2576