Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제41권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-43
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Marginal and internal fit of nano-composite CAD/CAM restorations

  • Park, So-Hyun (Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Yeon-Jee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Shin, Yoo-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.25
  • 심사 : 2015.11.27
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of nano-composite CAD-CAM restorations. Materials and Methods: A full veneer crown and an mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) inlay cavity, which were prepared on extracted human molars, were used as templates of epoxy resin replicas. The prepared teeth were scanned and CAD-CAM restorations were milled using Lava Ultimate (LU) and experimental nano-composite CAD/CAM blocks (EB) under the same milling parameters. To assess the marginal and internal fit, the restorations were cemented to replicas and were embedded in an acrylic mold for sectioning at 0.5 mm intervals. The measured gap data were pooled according to the block types and measuring points for statistical analysis. Results: Both the block type and measuring point significantly affected gap values, and their interaction was significant (p = 0.000). In crowns and inlays made from the two blocks, gap values were significantly larger in the occlusal area than in the axial area, while gap values in the marginal area were smallest (p < 0.001). Among the blocks, the restorations milled from EB had a significantly larger gap at all measuring points than those milled from LU (p = 0.000). Conclusions: The marginal and internal gaps of the two nano-composite CAD/CAM blocks differed according to the measuring points. Among the internal area of the two nano-composite CAD/CAM restorations, occlusal gap data were significantly larger than axial gap data. The EB crowns and inlays had significantly larger gaps than LU restorations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012;28:529-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003
  2. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-383. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-238
  3. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33:705-710. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-208
  4. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspects of CAD/CAM composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:273-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60138-2
  5. 3M ESPE M: Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM restorativetechnical product profile. 2011. Available from: http://www.d-way.cz/data/product/13/23/files/Lava_Ult_TPP.pdf (updated 2016 Jan 2).
  6. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-206. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  7. Wang WC, McDonald A, Petrie A, Setchell D. Interface dimensions of CEREC-3 MOD onlays. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2007;15:183-189.
  8. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2000;16:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00089-5
  9. Sjogren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24-28. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005940
  10. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. Oper Dent 2008;33:644-650. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-162
  11. Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:216-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60128-X
  12. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:853-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205
  13. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-248.
  14. Krasanaki ME, Pelekanos S, Andreiotelli M, Koutayas SO, Eliades G. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types on marginal fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:170-172.
  15. Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-292.
  16. Rungruanganunt P, Kelly JR, Adams DJ. Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 2010;38:995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.015
  17. Matta RE, Schmitt J, Wichmann M, Holst S. Circumferential fit assessment of CAD/CAM single crowns-a pilot investigation on a new virtual analytical protocol. Quintessence Int 2012;43:801-809.
  18. Fonseca JC, Henriques GE, Sobrinho LC, de Goes MF. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium copings. Dent Mater 2003;19:686-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00014-9
  19. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:747-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O
  20. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  21. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
  22. Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent 2009;37:913-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.006
  23. Stawarczyk B, Egli R, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:386-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60153-4
  24. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007;35:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008
  25. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006;15:155-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x
  26. Kim JH, Cho BH, Lee JH, Kwon SJ, Yi YA, Shin Y, Roh BD, Seo DG. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:107-113. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.956145
  27. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:374-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.008
  28. Nam SJ, Yoon MJ, Kim WH, Ryu GJ, Bang MK, Huh JB. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:519-521. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4089

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of alumina-blasting pressure on adhesion of CAD/CAM resin block to dentin vol.37, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-237
  2. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns pp.1881-1361, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-315
  3. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies vol.121, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006
  4. Marginal adaptation of different hybrid ceramic inlays after thermal cycling vol.119, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2020.1774219
  5. Analysis of Cosmetic Effect of Nanocomposite Resin on Anterior Teeth vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7367320