A Study on the Recent Trends for Reforming the MIA 1906 and Comments on them - Focusing on the Insurance Act 2015 -

영국해상보험법의 최근 개정동향 및 시사점 - 2015년 영국 Insurance Act를 중심으로 -

  • 전해동 (한국해양대학교 해사대학) ;
  • 신건훈 (경상대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Received : 2016.02.01
  • Accepted : 2016.02.19
  • Published : 2016.02.29

Abstract

The Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MIA 1906) has been a successful piece of legislation, having rarely been amended and having established, or served as an influence in the development of, the basis of marine insurance legislation in several countries. However, it has been recognised that some parts of the MIA 1906 have begun to show their antiquated nature, especially where established principles which were once thought to reflect undoubted propositions of law are now being openly criticised. Since 2006, the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission (the 'Law Commissions') have been engaged in a major review of insurance contract law, finally leading to the Insurance Act 2015. The Insurance Act 2015 received Royal Assent on 12 February 2015, and was based primarily on the joint recommendations of the Law Commissions. The 2015 Act made substantial changes to several main areas of marine insurance law & practice: (i) the replacement of the pre-contractual duty of disclosure with a duty to make a "fair presentation of the risk"; (ii) the abolition of the "insurance warranty" under the Marine Insurance Act 1906, s.33, and provision of a new default remedy of suspension of liability until the breach is cured; (iii) partial codification of the fraudulent claims rule in insurance contract law, etc. The Act did not provide for any new statutory duty for insurers to investigate or pay claims in a timely fashion, although this may be revisited in the next Parliament. Moreover, the Law Commissions have reopened their consideration of the doctrine of insurable interest. The 2015Actmay not then signal the end of the legislative programme in this area.

Keywords

References

  1. 김진권.전해동, "해상보험계약상 영국법 준거약관에 관한 국제사법적 고찰", 해사법연구 제18권 제2호, 한국해사법학회, 2006.
  2. 김찬영, "해상보험에 있어 담보특약 법리의 변화와 그 시사점에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지 제37권 제2호, 한국해법학회, 2015.
  3. 박세민, "보험자의 정보제공의무에 관한 영국, 독일 및 유럽보험계약법 준칙의 비교 분석에 관한 연구", 안암법학 제47권, 안암법학회, 2015.
  4. 신건훈, "영국 보험계약법 상 최대선의의무에 관한 주요 개혁동향", 무역상무연구 제49권, 한국무역상무학회, 2011.
  5. 신건훈, "영국 보험계약법 상 담보법원칙의 개혁동향에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구 제55권, 한국무역상무학회, 2012.
  6. 신건훈, "영국 보험법의 개혁동향에 관한 연구-사기적인 보험금청구에 대한 구제 수단을 중심으로-", 무역상무연구 제67권, 한국무역상무학회, 2015.
  7. 이윤석, "보험계약상 최대선의의무와 고지의무", 한양법학 제21권 제4집, 한양법학회, 2010.
  8. 이원정, "영국법상 보험금의 지급지체에 대한 보험자의 책임", 한국해법학회지 제37권 제2호, 한국해법학회, 2015.
  9. 이정원, "2015년 영국보험법상 워런티의 의의와 법률 효과에 대한 고찰", 저스티스 제150호, 한국법학원, 2015.
  10. 정완용, "해상보험법상 보험자 면책사유와 담보특약에 관한 고찰", 한국해법학회지 제37권 제1호, 한국해법학회, 2015.
  11. Australian Law Reform Commission ("ALRC"), Report No. 91, Review of the Marine Insurance Act 1909.
  12. Davey, J, "English Marine Insurance and General Average Law", International Maritime and Commercial Law Yearbook, 2015.
  13. Diamond, A., 'The Law of Marine Insurance - has it a future?' LMCLQ, 1986.
  14. Eggers, P.M., 'The Marine Insurance Act 1906: judicial attitudes and innovation - time for reform?', in Chapter 10 of D.R. Thomas (ed), Marine Insurance: The Law in Transition, London: Informa, 2006.
  15. Hasson, R.A., "The Basis of the Contract Clause in Insurance Law", The Modern Law Review Vol. 34 No. 1, London School of Economics & Political Science, 1971.
  16. MacGillivray on Insurance Law, 11th edn, London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2008.
  17. Merkin, R. and Gurses, O., "The Insurance Act 2015: Rebalancing the Interests of Insurer and Assured", MLR 78(6), 2015.
  18. Rose, F.D., "Restating insurance contract law: centennial reflections on landmark reform", LMCLQ, 2006.
  19. The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission, Insurance Contract Law : Business Disclosure; Warranties ; Insurers' Remedies for Fraudulent Claims; and Late Payment, Law Com No 353/Scot Law Com No 238, 2014.
  20. The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, Insurance Contract Law: the Business Insured's Duty of Disclosure and the Law of Warranties, (LCCP No.204; ScLCDP No.155; 2012).