VP-ellipsis, Stripping, and the Functions of the Delimiter -to in Korean

  • Received : 2016.02.05
  • Accepted : 2016.02.15
  • Published : 2016.02.28

Abstract

VP-ellipsis constructions in English can be schematized as S + [NP finite-AUX __ ] where the underlined part is understood to be a VP. Similarly, the pattern S + NP[-to] can be observed in Korean colloquial contexts. Though the English VP-ellipsis sentence pattern and the Korean pattern superficially seem to be similar, the Korean pattern exhibits peculiar properties: Syntactically, the NP of the pattern should have the delimiter -to. Semantically, it may convey ambiguous readings: VP-ellipsis-like and/or Stripping-like interpretation. To account for the pattern at issue, we propose a base-generated analysis driven by the delimiter -to within a construction grammar. We claim that the mother of the NP[-to] in this pattern is an S whose meaning is ambiguous between a VP-ellipsis-like and a Stripping-like reading. Consequently, the code of the VP-ellipsis in English is finite auxiliary verbs while that of the pattern S + NP[-to] in Korean is the delimiter -to.

Keywords

References

  1. Boas, Hans C and Sag, Ivan A. (Eds.). 2012. Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. xvi+-391). CSLI Publications/Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  2. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  3. Han, Jae-Hyun. 1981. Deletion and pro-form in Korean and English. Ph.D dissertation, Chonbuk National University.
  4. Huang, C-T. James. 1987. Remarks on empty categories in Chinese. Linguistic inquiry, 321-337.
  5. Kim, Jin-sook. 2012. Comprehension of elided phrases in Korean and English: VP-ellipsis, null object constructions, and one-substitution. Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI 'I AT MANOA.
  6. Kim, Jong-Bok and Peter Sells. 2008. English Syntax: An Introduction. CSLI publications, Stanford CA.
  7. Kim, Jong-Bok. 2015. Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach. Studies in Generative Grammar 25(3): 703-733. https://doi.org/10.15860/sigg.25.3.201508.703
  8. Lee, Yong-Hun and Kim, Jong-Bok. 2012. A Constraint-based Analysis of VP-anaphora in Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language 28.1, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.28.1.201205.111
  9. Lee, Yong-Hun. 2012. A Unified Approach to VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Chungnam National University Daejeon Stefan Muller (Editor) 2012 CSLI Publications, 272.
  10. Otani, Kazuyo and John Whitman. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 345-358.
  11. Park, Myung-Kwan. 1997. The syntax of VP ellipsis in Korean. Language research 33.4: 629-648.
  12. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  13. Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Ph.D Dissertation, MIT.
  14. Sag, Ivan, Thomas Wasow, and Emily Bender. 2004. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  15. Seo, Tae-Lyong. 2005. The Postposition '-do' in Korean Dictionaries. The research on Korean Language and literature, 44, 125-150.