Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제20권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1155-1171
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Demands and distribution of hysteretic energy in moment resistant self-centering steel frames

  • Lopez-Barraza, Arturo (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Ruiz, Sonia E. (Instituto de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico) ;
  • Reyes-Salazar, Alfredo (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Bojorquez, Eden (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.01
  • 심사 : 2015.10.19
  • 발행 : 2016.04.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Post-tensioned (PT) steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) with semi-rigid connections (SRC) can be used to control the hysteretic energy demands and to reduce the maximum inter-story drift (${\gamma}$). In this study the seismic behavior of steel MRFs with PT connections is estimated by incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis in terms of dissipated hysteretic energy ($E_H$) demands. For this aim, five PT steel MRFs are subjected to 30 long duration earthquake ground motions recorded on soft soil sites. To assess the energy dissipated in the frames with PT connections, a new expression is proposed for the hysteretic behavior of semi-rigid connections validated by experimental tests. The performance was estimated not only for the global $E_H$ demands in the steel frames; but also for, the distribution and demands of hysteretic energy in beams, columns and connections considering several levels of deformation. The results show that $E_H$ varies with ${\gamma}$, and that most of $E_H$ is dissipated by the connections. It is observed in all the cases a log-normal distribution of $E_H$ through the building height. The largest demand of $E_H$ occurs between 0.25 and 0.5 of the height. Finally, an equation is proposed to calculate the distribution of $E_H$ in terms of the normalized height of the stories (h/H) and the inter-story drift.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Secretaria de Educacion Publica

참고문헌

  1. Akbas, B., Shen, J. and Hao, H. (2001), "Energy approach in performance-based design of steel moment resisting frames for basic safety objective", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10(3), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.172
  2. Akiyama, H. (1985), Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design for Buildings, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Arias, A. (1970), "A measure of earthquake intensity", Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants; (R.J. Hansen Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 438-483.
  4. Bojorquez, E. and Rivera, J.L. (2008), "Effects of degrading models for ductility and dissipated hysteretic energy in uniform annual failure rate spectra", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  5. Bojorquez, E. and Ruiz, S.E. (2004), "Strength reduction factors for the valley of Mexico taking into account low cycle fatigue effects", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Paper 516. (CD-ROM)
  6. Bojorquez, E., Ruiz, S.E. and Teran-Gilmore, A. (2008), "Reliability-based evaluation of steel structures using energy concepts", Eng. Struct.. 30(6), 1745-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.014
  7. Bojorquez, E., Reyes-Salazar, A., Teran-Gilmore, A. and Ruiz, S.E. (2010), "Energy-based damage index for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 10(4), 343-360.
  8. Carr, A. (2011), "RUAUMOKO", Inelastic Dynamic Analysis Program; University of Cantenbury, Department of Civil Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  9. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2006), "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.008
  10. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2009), "Evaluation of seismic energy demand and its application on design of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 31(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.31.1.093
  11. Choi, B.J. and Shen, J.H. (2001), "The establishing of performance level thresholds for steel momentresisting frame using an energy approach", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.161
  12. Christopoulos, C. and Filiatrault, A. (2002), "Seismic response of posttensioned energy dissipating moment resisting steel frames", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK, September.
  13. Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A. and Uang, C.M. (2002), "Self-centering post-tensioned energy dissipating (PTED) steel frames for seismic regions", Report No. SSRP-2002/06; Division of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  14. Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A. and Uang, C.M. (2003), "Seismic demands on post-tensioned energy dissipating moment-resisting steel frames", Proceedings of 4th International Conference on the Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), Naples, Italy, June.
  15. Chung, C.C., Tsai, K.C. and Yang, W.C. (2009), "Self-centering steel connection with steel bars and a discontinuous composite slab", Earthquake Engng Struc. Dyn., 38(4), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.856
  16. Cosenza, E. and Manfredi, G. (1996), "Seismic design based on low cycle fatigue criteria", Proceedings of XI World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 1141, Acapulco, Mexico, June. (CD)
  17. El-Salti, M.Kh. (1992), "Design of frames with partially restrained connections", Ph.D. Dissertation; The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  18. Garlock, M., Ricles, J. and Sause, R. (2005), "Experimental studies on full-scale post tensioned steel connections", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(3), 438-448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(438)
  19. Garlock, M., Sause, R. and Ricles, J. (2007), "Behavior and design of posttensioned stell frames system", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 133(3), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:3(389)
  20. Garlock, M., Sause, R. and Ricles, J. (2008), "Influence of design parameter on seismic response of posttensioned steel MRF systems", Eng. Struct., 30(4), 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.026
  21. Hancock, J. and Bommer, J.J. (2006), "A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion durationon structural damage", Earthq. Spectra, 22(3), 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2220576
  22. Hu, X. and Zhang, Y. (2013), "Ductility demand of partially self-centering structures under seismic loading: SDOF systems", Earthq. Struct., 4(4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.4.365
  23. Kim, H.J. and Christopoulos, C. (2009), "Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post-tensioned self-centering steel frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.859
  24. Kim, H.J., Ghaboussi, J. and Elnashai, A.S., (2010), "Mechanical and informational modeling of steel beamto-column connections", Eng. Struct., 32(2), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.007
  25. Lopez-Barraza, A., Bojorquez, E., Ruiz, S.E. and Reyes-Salazar, A. (2013), "Reduction of maximum and residual drifts on post-tensioned steel frames with semi-rigid connections", Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, ID 192484. DOI:10.1155/2013/192484
  26. Pirmoz, A. and Danesh, F. (2009), "The seat angle role on moment-rotation response of bolted angle connection", Electron. Struct. Eng., 9, 73-79.
  27. MCBC (2004), Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal. [In Spanish]
  28. Richard, R.M. (1993), PRCONN manual; RMR Design Group, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  29. Richard, R.M. and Abbott, B.J. (1975), "Versatile elastic-plastic stress-strain formula", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 101(4), 511-515.
  30. Ricles, J.M., Sause, R., Garlock, M.M. and Zhao, C. (2001), "Posttensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 127(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(113)
  31. Ricles, J.M., Sause, R., Peng, S.W. and Lu, L.W. (2002), "Experimental evaluation of earthquake resistant posttensioned steel connections", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 128(7), 850-859. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(850)
  32. Ricles, J.M., Sause, R., Lin, Y.C. and Seo, C.Y. (2010), "Self-centering moment connections for damagefree seismic response of steel MRFs", 2010 Structures Congress ASCE, Orlando, FL, USA, May, pp. 955-966.
  33. Shen, J., and Astaneh-Asl, A. (1999), "Hysteretic behavior of bolted angle connections", J. Construct. Steel Res., 51(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00030-9
  34. Teran-Gilmore, A. (1996), "Performance-based earthquake-resistant design of framed buildings using energy concepts", Ph. D. Dissertation; University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  35. Teran-Gilmore, A. (2001), "Consideraciones del uso de la energia plastica en el diseno sismico", Revista de ingenieria Sismica, SMIS, 65, 81-110.
  36. Teran-Gilmore, A. and Jirsa, J.O. (2005), "A damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue", Earthq. Spectra, 21(3), 803-832. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1979500
  37. Teran-Gilmore, A. and Jirsa, J.O. (2007), "Energy demands for seismic design against low-cycle fatigue", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(3), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.663
  38. Tong, G., Lianglong, S. and Guodong, Z. (2011), "Numerical simulation of the seismic behavior of selfcentering steel beam-column connections with bottom flange friction devices", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 10(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0061-5
  39. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G. (1975), "A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65(3), 581-626.
  40. Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V. (1990), "Evaluation of seismic energy in structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108
  41. Wolski, M., Ricles, J.M. and Sause, R. (2009), "Experimental study of self-centering beam-column connection with bottom flange friction device", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 135(5), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000006
  42. Zhou, Z., He, X.T., Wu, J., Wang, C.L. and Meng, S.P. (2014), "Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace with BFRP composite tendons", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(5), 491-506. DOI: 10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.491

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic response of 3D steel buildings with hybrid connections: PRC and FRC vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.1.113
  2. Cyclic behavior of hexagonal castellated beams in steel moment-resisting frames with post-tensioned connections vol.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.05.001
  3. Test and analysis on a novel self-restoring uplift column 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217753693
  4. Seismic response and energy dissipation of 3D complex steel buildings considering the influence of interior semi-rigid connections: low- medium- and high-rise vol.16, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0405-x
  5. Experimental study of a pretensioned connection for modular buildings vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.3.217
  6. Experimental study on hysteretic behavior of steel moment frame equipped with elliptical brace vol.34, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.891
  7. Seismic design and assessment of steel-concrete frame structures with welded dissipative fuses vol.35, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.4.527
  8. Experimental study on component performance in steel plate shear wall with self-centering braces vol.37, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.3.341
  9. Assessment of hysteretic damping in reinforced concrete structures using local hinge characteristics vol.19, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00968-z
  10. Evaluating the ductility reduction factors of SDOF self-centering earthquake-resisting structural systems vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01041-z
  11. Distribution of hysteretic energy demands in self-centering concrete frames with hybrid joints vol.148, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106828