DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Updated Checklist and Perspective Study of Millipedes (Arthropoda: Myriapoda: Diplopoda) in the Korean Peninsula

  • Nguyen, Anh D. (Institute of Phylogenomics and Evolution, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Kuem Hee (Institute of Phylogenomics and Evolution, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hyun, Jung Su (Department of Biology Education, Graduate School of Education, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hwang, Ui Wook (Department of Biology, Teachers College & Institute for Phylogenomics and Evolution, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2015.11.16
  • Accepted : 2016.01.05
  • Published : 2016.01.31

Abstract

The Korean peninsula has diverse habitats and so would be expected to have a rich millipede fauna because of its location between the Paleoarctic and Oriental regions. To facilitate studies on millipedes, this work provides an updated list and discussion of Korean millipedes. A total of 69 species had been recorded up to 2010, but since then no new species have been reported. Among 69 species, 49 are endemic to the Korean peninsula. From 1950 to the present, an average of only seven new species from the Korean peninsula has been described per decade. This number does not reflect the biodiversity of millipedes in Korea, especially when compared to Taiwan, which has only one-third the area of the Korean peninsula, but from which a greater number of millipede species have been recorded (75 vs. 69 species). Japan has twofold the land area of the Korean peninsula, and an almost threefold higher number of millipede species. Further, more-intensive surveys will likely result in identification of more millipede species in the Korean peninsula.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Millipede (class Diplopoda) is one of the most diverse and ancient groups in nature (Bueno-Villegas et al., 2004; Golovatch and Kime, 2009). To date, about 10,000 species have been described, but 80,000 species are estimated to exist (Bueno-Villegas et al., 2004; Golovatch and Kime, 2009). Millipedes are sarcophagous animals that feed on leaves and tree branches, and play important roles in ecosystems. Their activities accelerate the decay of organic matter, and return materials and nutrients to the ecosystem (Hopkin and Read, 1992; Golovatch and Kime, 2009). Furthermore, millipedes may provide a cure for acquired immune-deficiency syndrome and other serious diseases (Jiang et al., 1981). Therefore, a greater understanding of millipedes will enable more-effective control, use and/or protection of bio-resources.

The Korean peninsula (=Korea, hereafter) is located in northeast Asia. The region’s topography is complex, with mountainous areas in the northern and eastern parts and large plains in the southern and western parts; mountains and plains are in some areas integrated. Due to its diverse topography and habitats, the Korean peninsula would be expected harbor a rich millipede fauna.

The millipedes of the Korean peninsula were studied beginning in the late 19th century, and investigations continued during the 20th century. Some important publications need to be taken into account such as Verhoeff (1936, 1937a, 1937b, 1938), Takakuwa (1940). The first list of millipedes in Korea was simply presented by Takakuwa and Kakashima (1940, 1944). The list was updated by Paik (1958) containing 22 species; several species were added later and summarized in the other list, which included 33 species (Lim, 1988). Lim (2001) summarized 48 species in his dissertation. This list is out of date due to recent discoveries of new species (Mikhaljova and Lim 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, 2008). Lim (2011) presented the list of 50 species plus 2 subspecies in 28 genera, 13 families and seven orders reported from the Korean peninsula. The most recent list was published by Lim (2013) in the National List of Species of Korea. This list contains 69 species in 32 genera, 15 families of seven orders. However, as species record confirmation and taxonomic treatment made by Mikhaljova (2001), Golovatch (2011), the list of Korean millipedes need to be updated. Thus, the present work aimed to provide an updated list of millipedes inhabiting Korea, a discussion of the millipede fauna, and comparison with neighboring countries. The updated list was compiled based on the previous studies of millipedes in Korea.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 69 species belonging to 31 genera, 15 families, and seven orders has been recorded in the Korean peninsula (Tables 1, 2). In comparison with the previous list presented by Lim (2013), Angorozonium bonum (Mikhaljova, 1979) was excluded from the list of Korean millipedes as discussed by Mikhaljova (2001); Oxidus obtusus (Takakuwa, 1942) was re-added; and Koreadesmus proprius Mikhaljova & Korsós, 2003 was reallocated to the genus Cawjeekelia by Golovatch (2011). The millipede fauna of Korea was dominated by julidan and polydesmidan species (20 and 25 species, respectively).

Table 1.aThe species, Pachydesmus bazanensis Takakuwa, 1942 is being doubtful. Chamberlin and Wang (1953) assigned this species to the genus Nikkonus which was subsequently synonymized with the genus Xystodesmus by Tanabe and Shinohara (1996). However, the type material of the species was destroyed because of fire in 1945, the taxonomic status of the species is still being questionable. Marek et al. (2014) placed it in the section “Species of uncertain status in Xystodesmus” and suggested that confirmation of its generic status awaits collection of fresh topotypic material from South Korea. bThe species, Oxidus obtusus (Takakuwa, 1942) was described based on a single male from South Korea, and later Chamberlin and Wang (1953) recorded two females from South Japan. However, there are no more records since then. Lim (2001) discussed and synonymized this species with its congener, Oxidus gracilis based on small differences in gonopod conformation. It is strongly recommended to have fresh material to confirm the species status.

Table 2.Number of recorded millipede species in Korea

The millipede fauna of Korea has high endemism. Of the 69 species, 49 are considered to be endemic because they are found only in Korea; the following 10 species are present in both Korea and the Asian part of Russia: Ansiulus matumotoi, Skleroprotopus coreanus, Anaulaciulus golovatchi, Diplomaragna kedrovaya, Orientyla dahurica, Levizonus variabilis, Sichotanus eurygaster, Cawjeekelia koreana, Epanerchodus koreanus, and Epanerchodus polymorphus. Another 10 species are found in both Korea and Japan: Amblyiulus lobatus, Brachycybe nodulosa, Diplomaraga gracilipes, Riukiuria semicircularis, Orthomorphella pekuensis, Oxidus gracilis, Oxidus obtusus, Nedyopus patrioticus, Epanerchodus bifidus, and Rhipidopeltis sinuata.

Of 69 species, Oxidus gracilis is widely distributed in the subtropics and tropics, and Orthomorphella pekuensis is present in China, Japan, and Taiwan (Nguyen and Sierwald, 2013). Two doubtful species, Pachydesmus bazanensis and Oxidus obtusus, need to be revised due to they have not been re-found in Korea since their description.

Of 16 known millipede orders, only seven have been recorded in Korea. Some orders, such as Siphonophorida, Spirobolida, Spirostreptida, are found in Japan, China, and Taiwan, but not in Korea to date. Theoretically, Korea is located within the distributional regions of those orders (Shelley and Golovatch, 2011); thus, those orders could be present in Korea and awaiting discovery.

The number of new species found in Korea has increased slowly, with an average of seven new species per decade since 1950 (Fig. 1). The majority of new species (15 species) were described during 2001-2010; however, no new species have been discovered in Korea since 2010.

Fig. 1.Number of millipede species recorded in Korea from 1950 to the present.

In comparison with neighboring countries, Korea has medium area, but only 69 species have been recorded. In con-trast, Taiwan is a small island, but 75 species have been recorded to date (Fig. 2). Japan is larger, and almost 300 millipede species have been identified to date. Korea is smaller than Vietnam in terms of land area, but has only one-third the number of millipede species. This suggests that the millipede fauna of Korea have not been the subject of sufficient investigations. Further undescribed species may await discovery in Korea.

Fig. 2.Number of millipede species from Korea and four Asian neighboring countries in comparison to their territorial sizes. Data sources: Asian part of Russian from Mikhaljova (2004); Japan from Murakami (1993); Taiwan from Korsós (2004) plus Chen et al. (2006, 2008, 2010), Mikhaljova et al. (2010); and Vietnam from Enghoff et al. (2004), plus Nguyen et al. (2005), Golovatch and Nguyen (2007), Nguyen (2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2011, 2012).

Korea is considered a valuable site for speciation and evolution studies because of its function as a geographical bridge between the Asian continent and the Pacific Ocean (Lim, 2001). The poor understanding of millipede fauna has impaired our understanding of millipede speciation and evolution. Therefore, further in-depth surveys of the millipedes of Korea are warranted.

References

  1. Bueno-Villegas J, Sierwald P, Bond JE, 2004. Diplopoda. In: Biodiversidad, taxonomia y biogeografia de artrópodos de México (Eds., Bousquets JL, Morrone JJ, Ordóñez OY, Fernández IV), 4:569-599.
  2. Chamberlin RV, Wang YM, 1953. Records of millipeds (Diplopoda) from Japan and other oriental areas, with descriptions of new genera and species. American Museum Novitates, 1621:1-14.
  3. Chen CC, Golovatch SI, Chang HW, 2006. The millipede tribe Nedyopodini, with special reference to the fauna of Taiwan (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae). Journal of Natural History, 39:3997-4030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930600556112
  4. Chen CC, Golovatch SI, Chang HW, 2008. Identity of the East Asian millipede Habrodesmus inexpectatus Attems, 1944 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae). Journal of Natural History, 42:2547-2556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930802354118
  5. Chen CC, Golovatch SI, Mikhaljova EV, Chang HW, 2010. The millipede genus Anoplodesmus Pocock, 1895, recorded in Taiwan for the first time, with descriptions of two new species (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae: Sulciferini). Zootaxa, 2399:20-30.
  6. Enghoff H, Golovatch SI, Nguyen AD, 2004. A review of the millipede fauna of Vietnam (Diplopoda). Arthropoda Selecta, 13:29-43.
  7. Golovatch SI, 2011. On several new or poorly-known Oriental Paradoxosomatidae (Diplopoda: Polydesmida), XI. Arthropoda Selecta, 20:259-266.
  8. Golovatch SI, Kime RD, 2009. Millipede (Diplopoda) distributions: a review. Soil Organisms, 81:565-597.
  9. Golovatch SI, Nguyen AD, 2007. Two new species of the millipede genus Platyrhacus C. L. Koch, 1847 from Vietnam (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Platyrhacidae). Arthropoda Selecta, 15:215-224.
  10. Hopkin SP, Read HJ, 1992. The biology of millipedes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-233.
  11. Jiang TL, Feng GW, Shen JH, Li LF, Fu XQ, 1981. Observation of the effect of Spirobolus bungii extract on cancer cells. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1:34-38.
  12. Korsós Z, 2004. Checklist and bibliography of millipedes (Diplopoda) of Taiwan. Collection and Research, 17:11-32.
  13. Lim KY, 1988. Taxonomical studies on the class Diplopoda from Korea. Master thesis, Institute of Agriculture, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea, pp. 1-34.
  14. Lim KY, 2001. Taxonomy of millipedes (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) in Korea. PhD dissertation, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea, pp. 1-264.
  15. Lim KY, 2011. Korean millipedes. National Science Museum, Daejeon, pp. 1-131.
  16. Lim KY, 2013. Class Diplopoda. National List of Species of Korea. Invertebrates III. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, pp. 1-15.
  17. Marek P, Tanabe T, Sierwald P, 2014. A species catalog of the millipede family Xystodesmidae (Diplopoda: Polydesmida). Virginia Museum of Natural History, Special Publication, 7:1-117.
  18. Mikhaljova EV, 2001. A contribution to the millipede faunas of Korea and the Russian Far East (Diplopoda). Arthropoda Selecta, 10:147-150.
  19. Mikhaljova EV, 2004. The millipedes (Diplopoda) of Asian part of Russia. Pensoft Publisher, Sofia-Moscow, pp. 1-292.
  20. Mikhaljova EV, Golovatch SI, Chang HW, 2010. The millipede family Diplomaragnidae in Taiwan, with descriptions of nine new species (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida). Zootaxa, 2615:23-46.
  21. Mikhaljova EV, Lim KY, 2000. Millipede fauna (Diplopoda) of South Korea. Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology, 16:147-157.
  22. Mikhaljova EV, Lim KY, 2006a. New records of the milliped order Polyzoniida from Korean Peninsula, with a redescription of Kiusiozonium okai (Takakuwa & Miyosi, 1949) (Diplopoda). Zootaxa, 1256:59-68.
  23. Mikhaljova EV, Lim KY, 2006b. New species of the genus Hyleoglomeris from Korea (Diplopoda: Glomerida: Glomeridae). Zootaxa, 1224:45-58.
  24. Mikhaljova EV, Lim KY, 2006c. The millipede genus Epanerchodus Attems, 1901 in the Korean Peninsula, with a description of a new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Polydesmidae). Zootaxa, 1350:45-53.
  25. Mikhaljova EV, Lim KY, 2008. The millipede family Diplomaragnidae Attems 1907 in the Korean Peninsula, with the descriptions of a new genus and new species (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida). Zootaxa, 1925:51-61.
  26. Murakami Y, 1993. Diplopoda, Pauropoda, Chilopoda, and Symphyla. In: A checklist of the Japanese species of wildlife. Invertebrates (Ed., Environmental Agency). Japanese Wildlife Research Center, Tokyo, pp. 95-106.
  27. Nguyen AD, 2009. A new species of the family Polydesmidae (Diplopoda: Polydesmida) from Vietnam. The International Journal of Myriapodology, 2:63-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187525409x462421
  28. Nguyen AD, 2010a. The millipede genus Anoplodesmus Pocock, 1895 in Vietnam (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae). Zootaxa, 2649:52-60.
  29. Nguyen AD, 2010b. The millipede tribe Sundaninini in Vietnam (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae). Zootaxa, 2479:59-68.
  30. Nguyen AD, 2011. A review of the millipede tribe Tonkinosomatini (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae) from Vietnam. Zootaxa, 3036:58-68.
  31. Nguyen AD, 2012. Tylopus millipedes in Vietnam (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae: Sulciferini), with descriptions of five new species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 60:289-311.
  32. Nguyen AD, Golovatch SI, Anichkin AE, 2005. Dragon millipedes (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, genus Desmoxytes) in Vietnam. Arthropoda Selecta, 13:251-257.
  33. Nguyen AD, Sierwald P, 2013. A worldwide catalog of the family Paradoxosomatidae Daday, 1889 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida). CheckList, 9:1132-1353. https://doi.org/10.15560/9.6.1132
  34. Paik KY, 1958. A list of Chilopoda, Symphila and Diplopoda from Korea. Kyungpook University Thesis Collection, 2:351-369 (in Korean, English summary).
  35. Shelley RM, Golovatch SI, 2011. Atlas of Myriapod biogeography. I. Indigenous ordinal and supra-ordinal distributions in the Diplopoda: perspectives on taxon origins and ages, and a hypothesis on the origin and early evolution of the class. Insecta Mundi, 0158:1-134.
  36. Takakuwa Y, 1940. Über Scleroprotopus-Arten (Chilopoda). Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses, 19:19-22.
  37. Takakuwa Y, Kakashima H, 1940. Chilopods and Diplopods known from Korea. Acta Arachnologica, 5:164-185. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.5.164
  38. Takakuwa Y, Kakashima H, 1944. Chilopods and Diplopods known from Korea, part II. Acta Arachnologica, 9:22-32. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.9.22
  39. Tanabe T, Shinohara K, 1996. Revision of the millipede genus Xystodesmus, with reference to the status of the tribe Xystodesmini (Diplopoda: Xystodesmidae. Journal of Natural History, 30:1459-1494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222939600770831
  40. Verhoeff KW, 1936. Zur Kenntnis ostasiatischer Strongylosomiden und Fontariiden.149. Diplopoden-Aufsatz. - Zoologischer Anzeiger, 115:297-311.
  41. Verhoeff KW, 1937a. Zur Kenntnis ostasiatischer Diplopoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 117:309-321.
  42. Verhoeff KW, 1937b. Zur Kenntnis ostasiatischer Diplopoden II. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 119:33-40.
  43. Verhoeff KW, 1938. Ostasiatische Höhlendiplopoden (148. Diplopoden-Aufsatz.). Mitteilungen über Höhlen- und Karstforschung, 1938:83-93.