Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the influence of Self-Efficacy to Goal Setting in the age of Convergence - Focusing on the Self-regulatory depletion and non-depletion group

융·복합 시대의 자기효능감이 목표설정이론에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 자아조절자원의 고갈과 비고갈 집단을 중심으로 -

  • Song, Chan-Sub (Dept. of Business Graduate School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Kyu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Yuen-Kyu (Dept. of Business Graduate School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Gu (Dept. of Business Graduate School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과 대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 김연규 (금오공과 대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 강은구 (금오공과 대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.01.26
  • Accepted : 2016.03.20
  • Published : 2016.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-efficacy that impacts on personal goal setting.. In addition, in the process of going to achieve the goal, this study was to evaluate the role of self-regulation resources. Specifically, this paper is divided into two groups of self-regulation resources, to analyze the relationship between self-efficacy and goal-setting theory. To achieve this goal, by manipulating the self-adjusting resources to target college students divided into two groups, this measured the performance of the self-efficacy and goal setting. In the test, the a mediated effect of goal setting between self-efficacy and performance was meaningful, and evidence of enhancing the self-regulatory resource by self-efficacy was found. As a result, this paper provides guideline that manages the performance by using the self-efficacy and self-regulatory resource.

본 연구는 개인이 구체적인 목표를 달성해 가는 과정에서 자기효능감이 미치는 영향을 알아보고, 나아가 목표를 달성해 나가는 과정에서 개인이 자아를 통제하는 힘인 자아조절자원이 어떠한 역할을 하는지 알아보고자 하였다. 구체적으로 자기효능감과 목표설정이론 간의 관계를 자아조절자원을 조건으로 구분하여 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해 대학생들을 대상으로 자아조절자원의 고갈 및 비고갈 집단을 조작하여, 자기효능감과 목표설정에 따른 성과를 측정하였다. 분석 결과, 자기효능감과 성과에 대한 목표설정의 매개효과가 확인되었으며, 자기효능감이 높을수록 자아조절자원이 강화되는 것을 일부 확인하였다. 따라서 자기효능감의 증대는 자아조절자원의 강화를 통해 꾸준히 높은 성과를 올릴 수 있는 토대가 된다는 사실을 확인할 수 있다. 이를 통해 기업에서는 종업원의 장기적인 고성과를 원하는 경우에 참고할만한 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baer, J. S., Holt, C. S., & Lichtenstein, E.. Self-efficacy and smoking reexamined: construct validity and clinical utility. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, Vol. 54, No.6, pp. 846,.1986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.6.846
  2. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology, Vol. 88 No. 1, pp. 87. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
  3. Bandura, A.. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, Vol. 84 No.2, pp.191. 1977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  4. Baumeister, R. F.. Yielding to temptation: Selfcontrol failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28 No.4, pp. 670-676. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1086/338209
  5. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W.. A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, Vol. 27 No.1, pp. 14-49. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003
  6. Boutton, T. W., & Yamasaki, S. I. (1996). Stable carbon isotope ratios of soil organic matter and their use as indicators of vegetation and climate change. Mass spectrometry of soils., pp. 47-82.
  7. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D.. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational research methods, Vol. 4 No.1, pp 62-83. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
  8. Dweck, C. S., yi Hong, Y., & yue Chiu, C.. Implicit theories individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19 No.5, pp. 644-656. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293195015
  9. Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K.. Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51 No.2, pp. 397. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x
  10. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L.. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 136 No.4, pp. 495. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
  11. Hsieh, P. H., Sullivan, J. R., Sass, D. A., & Guerra, N. S.. Undergraduate engineering students' beliefs, coping strategies, and academic performance: An evaluation of theoretical models. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 80 No.2, pp. 196-218. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596853
  12. Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, D. E.. Work motivation: Theory and practice. American psychologist, Vol. 45 No..2, pp.144, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.144
  13. Lee, F. K., Sheldon, K. M., & Turban, D. B.. Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No.2, pp. 256. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.256
  14. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, Vol. 57 No.9, pp. 705. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  15. Miner, J. B.. The expanded horizon for achieving entrepreneurial success. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 25 No.3, pp. 54-67. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90047-4
  16. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F.. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?. Psy chological bulletin, Vol. 126 No.2, pp. 247. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
  17. Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P. A.. The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79 No.5, pp. 755. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.755
  18. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V.. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, Vol. 82 No.1, pp. 33. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  19. VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum Jr, J. W.. The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 249. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249
  20. Vohs, Kathleen. D., Roy F. Baumeister, and Natalie, J. Ciarocco, "Self-Regulation and Self-Presentation: Regulatory Resource Depletion Impairs Impression Management and Effortful Self-Presentation Depletes Regulatory Resources," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 632-657, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.632
  21. Welsh, D. T., & Ordonez, L. D.. Conscience without cognition: The effects of subconscious priming on ethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 57 No.3, pp.723-742. 2014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1009
  22. Sunghyun Yun, Keunho Lee, Heuiseok Lim, Daeryong Kim, Jung-hoon Kim, "The Method of Digital Copyright Authentication for Contents of Collective Intelligence", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 185-193, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.6.185
  23. Ji won Lee, Kyung-hee Kang, "Study about the relationship between self-esteem, depression and stress of students according to school system", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 69-74, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.069
  24. Winne, P. H., Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153-189).
  25. Bandura, A.. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1986.
  26. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, Vol 27 No 1, pp. 14-49. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003