DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Importance of Robot Personality in a Museum Context

박물관 맥락에서의 로봇성격 설정의 중요성 연구

  • 구지향 (성균관대학교 인터랙션사이언스학과) ;
  • 신동희 (성균관대학교 인터랙션사이언스학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.10
  • Accepted : 2015.11.09
  • Published : 2016.03.28

Abstract

This study investigates human-robot interactions in a museum environment. Unlike robots in movies, robots in real life do not have 'personality,' but instead have a specific purpose and function. This research is primarily about the assignment of specific and appropriate personalities to robots in different contexts. Methods by which a definite personality can be imparted on a robot are discussed in this research. Previous research has addressed attempts to assign a robot personality based on the task context. However, the discussion of robot personality is incomplete. Therefore, we assumed that a robot's character was dependent on the characteristics of its location of use. We planned a $2{\times}2$ comparison of various robot personalities, i.e., introverted or extroverted paired with either a traditional museum or a process-oriented experiential experience. Based on Schmitt's (1999) strategic experiential modules, experiential factors were derived for each set of conditions. To achieve the objectives of the research, theoretical and empirical research were conducted simultaneously. The software JMP 9 was used to verify the research model and hypotheses.

본 연구는 사람과 로봇의 인터랙션을 알아보는 것을 목적으로 한다. 영화 속에서 등장하는 로봇과는 달리 실생활에서 만나는 로봇에는 특정한 성격이 존재하지 않는다. 본 연구는 다른 맥락을 가지고 있는 공간에서 로봇의 성격을 어떤 식으로 매치하는 것이 효과적인가에 대해 논의하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 외향성, 내향성이라는 두 가지 성격의 유형을 구분하고 선행연구에 기반하여 전통적인 형태의 박물관, 과정 중심적인 박물관 유형 조건으로 피험자간 설계를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 피험자들은 로봇의 성격만 보았을 때 체험요소에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 못한 것으로 나타났다. 반면 다른 맥락의 장소 조건에서는 사회 정체감 요소에서 유의미한 결과를 보였다. 또한 모든 조건에서의 인터랙션 효과는 유의미하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 흥미로운 사실은 사용자가 가장 선호하는 조건은 외향적 성격의 로봇과 과정 중심적인 박물관 유형이며, 사용자가 가장 선호하지 않는 조건은 외향적 성격의 로봇과 전통적 유형의 박물관이었다. 이러한 결과의 함의에 대해서는 본문에서 논의하고 있다. 통계 분석은 JMP 9을 사용하여 리서치 모델 및 가설을 검증 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Aarts and A. Dijksterhuis, "Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.78, No.1, pp.53-63, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.53
  2. J. Ap and K. K. Wong, "Case study on tour guiding: Professionalism, issues and problems," Tourism Management, Vol.22, No.5, pp.551-563, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00013-9
  3. T. Bennett, The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics, Routledge, 2013.
  4. B. L. Bonner, "The effects of extroversion on influence in ambiguous group tasks," Small Group Research, Vol.31, No.2, pp.225-244, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100205
  5. D. P. Campbell, L. Crichton, J. I. Hansen, and P. Webber, "A new edition of the SVIB: The Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory," Measurement & Evaluation in Guidance, 1974.
  6. W. H. Delone and E. R. McLean, "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.19, No.4, pp.9-30, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  7. C. F. DiSalvo, F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler, "All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads," InProceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp.321-326, 2002.
  8. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, "A survey of socially interactive robots," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol.42, No.3, pp.143-166, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X
  9. B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn Jr, and J. Hagman, " Hardware companions?: What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship," In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.273-280, 2003.
  10. S. D. Gosling, P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann, "A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains," Journal of Research in personality, Vol.37, No.6, pp.504-528, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
  11. J. Goetz, S. Kiesler, and A. Powers, "Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation," InRobot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003 Proceedings, ROMAN 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop, pp.55-60, 2003.
  12. A. L. Grinder and E. S. McCoy, The good guide: a sourcebook for interpreters, docents, and tour guides, Ironwood Press, 1985.
  13. H. Huttenrauch, A. Green, M. Norman, L. Oestreicher, and K. S. Eklundh, "Involving users in the design of a mobile office robot," Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, Vol.34, No.2, pp.113-124, 2004.
  14. O. P. John, E. M. Donahue, and R. Kentle, The big-five inventory, technical report, insititute of personality and social research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1991.
  15. M. Joosse, M. Lohse, J. G. Perez, and V. Evers, "What you do is who you are: the role of task context in perceived social robot personality," In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference, pp.2134-2139, 2013.
  16. S. G. Kang, The influence of virtual experiential marketing on customer attitude and purchase intention: focusing on online shopping mall, Gachon University, 2014.
  17. K. J. Kim, E. Park, and S. S. Sundar, "Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.29, No.4, pp.1799-1806, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009
  18. M. K. Kim, The effect of docent and mobile-guide on the satisfaction of visitors: depending on the type of the museum and viewing experience, Korea University, 2010.
  19. R. Korn, "An analysis of differences between visitors at natural history museums and science centers," Curator: The Museum Journal, Vol.38, No.3, pp.150-160, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1995.tb01051.x
  20. N. G. Kotler, P. Kotler, and W. I. Kotler, Museum marketing and strategy: designing missions, building audiences, generating revenue and resources, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
  21. S. Lauriar, G. Bugmann, T. Kyriacou, J. Bos, and E. Klein, "Training personal robots using natural language instruction," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol.5, pp.38-45, 2001.
  22. K. M. Lee, W. Peng, S. A. Jin, and C. Yan, "Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction," Journal of Communication, Vol.56, No.4, pp.754-772, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
  23. T. McGill, V. Hobbs, and J. Klobas, "User developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model," Information Resources Management Journal, Vol.16, No.1, pp.24-45, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003010103
  24. C. Nass, and Y. Moon, "Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers," Journal of Social Issues, Vol.56, No.1, pp.81-103, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  25. S. Parise, S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, and K. Waters, "Cooperating with life-like interface agents," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.15, No.2, pp.123-142, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00035-1
  26. J. H. Park, "The case study of experience marketing for brand strategy," The Treatise on The Plastic Media, Vol.14, No.3, pp.67-76, 2011.
  27. H. T. Park, A study on the development system of cultural products for expanding the culture services and reinforcing the financial stability of the museum, Hongik University, 2007.
  28. E. Petkus, "Enhancing the application of experiential marketing in the arts," International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol.9, No.1, pp.49-56, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.232
  29. H. Prendinger and M. Ishizuka, "Let's talk! Socially intelligent agents for language conversation training," Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, Vol.31, No.5, pp.465-471, 2001.
  30. R. Prentice, "Experiential cultural tourism: Museums & the marketing of the new romanticism of evoked authenticity," Museum Management and Curatorship, Vol.19, No.1, pp.5-26, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770100201901
  31. B. Schmitt, "Experiential marketing," Journal of marketing management, Vol.15, No.1, pp.53-67, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496
  32. D. Shin and H. Choo, "Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human-robot interaction," Interaction Studies, Vol.12, No.3, pp.430-460, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.12.3.04shi
  33. S. Thrun, M. Beetz, M. Bennewitz, W. Burgard, A. B. Cremers, F. Dellaert, and D. Schulz, "Probabilistic algorithms and the interactive museum tour-guide robot minerva," The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol.19, No.11, pp.972-999, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/02783640022067922
  34. H. D. Yang, A. Y. Park, and S. W. Lee, "Gesture spotting and recognition for human-robot interaction," Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, Vol.23, No.2, pp.256-270, 2007.
  35. L. A. Zebrowitz, M. A. Collins, and R. Dutta, "The relationship between appearance and personality across the life span," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.24, No.7, pp.736-749, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298247006
  36. Jennifer Goetz, Sara Kiesler, and Aaron Powers, "Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation," Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003 Proceedings, ROMAN 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on IEEE, 2003.
  37. 신동희, 김희경, "디지털 사이니지의 공간성," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제15권, 제8호, pp.77-84, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.08.077
  38. 신동희, 김희경, "소셜 시청(viewing)의 사용자 경험적 분석: 사용자 경험기반의 소셜 TV," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제14권, 제12호, pp.112-122, 2014.

Cited by

  1. Robot Personality Insights. Designing Suitable Robot Personalities for Different Domains vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2017-0003