Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.589-611
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic upgrading of structures with different retrofitting methods

  • 투고 : 2014.10.06
  • 심사 : 2016.01.21
  • 발행 : 2016.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper presents an analytical study aimed at evaluating the seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) retrofitted with different approaches. For this, 3, 6 and 12 storey MRFs having four equal bays of 5 m were selected as the case study models. The models were designed with lateral stiffness insufficient to satisfy code drift and hinge limitations in zones with high seismic hazard. Three different retrofit strategies including traditional diagonal bracing system and energy dissipation devices such as buckling restrained braces and viscoelastic dampers were used for seismic upgrading of the existing structures. In the nonlinear time history analysis, a set of ground motions representative of the design earthquake with 10% exceedance probability in fifty years was taken into consideration. Considering the local and global deformations, the results in terms of inter-storey drift index, global damage index, plastic hinge formations, base shear demand and roof drift time history were compared. It was observed that both buckling-restrained braces and viscoelastic dampers allowed for an efficient reduction in the demands of the upgraded frames as compared to traditional braces.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Armouti, N.S. (2013), "Effect of dampers on seismic demand of short period structures in soft sites", Res. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol., 5(6), 2203-2211.
  2. Asgarian, B. and Amirhesari, N. (2008), "Comparison of dynamic nonlinear behavior of ordinary and buckling restrained braced frames subjected to strong ground motion", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 17(2), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.358
  3. Barroso, L.R., Breneman, S.E. and Smith, H.A. (2002), "Performance evaluation of controlled steel frames under multilevel seismic loads", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(11), 1368-1378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:11(1368)
  4. Bitaraf, M., Hurlebaus, S. and Barraso, L.R. (2012), "Active and semi-active control for undamaged and damaged building structures under seismic load", Comput. Aid. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 27(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00719.x
  5. Chandra, R., Masand, M., Nandi, S., Tripathi, C.P., Pall, R. and Pall, A. (2000), "Friction-Dampers for seismic control of La Gardenia towers south city, Gurgaon, India", 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Aukland, New Zealand, Paper No. 2008.
  6. CSI (2009), CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS and SAFE, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  7. FEMA-273 (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
  8. FEMA-356 (2000), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
  9. FEMA-450 (2003), Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
  10. Gerb geselischaft fur isolierung mbH and CO KG (1978), "Vibration Isolation systems", 13407 Berlin 51, Roedmallee, 174-176.
  11. Gu, Q., Zona, A., Peng, Y. and Dall'Asta, A. (2014), "Effect of buckling-restrained brace model parameters on seismic structural response", J. Constr. Steel Res., 98, 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.02.009
  12. Jain, A.K., Hanson, R.D. and Goel, S.C. (1980), "Hysteretic cycles of axially loaded steel members", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 106(8), 1777-1795.
  13. Kiggins, S. and Uang, C.M. (2006), "Reduction residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as dual system", Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1525-1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.023
  14. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2005), "Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames", Eng. Struct., 27(2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009
  15. Krawinkler, H. and Gupta, A. (1998), "Story drift demands for steel moment frame structures in different seismic regions", Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, USA.
  16. Kumar, G.R., Kumar, S.R.S. and Kalyanaraman, V. (2007), "Behaviour of frames with non-buckling bracings under earthquake loading", J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(2), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.04.012
  17. Langenbach, R. and Kelley, J. (1991), "Soft energy dissipating design for the seismic strengthening of masonry infill frame midrise buildings: The Woodrow Hotel, Oakland", Conference on the Seismic Strengthening of Historic Buildings Proceedings, San Francisco, USA.
  18. Madhekar, S.N. and Jangid, R.S. (2009), "Variable dampers for earthquake protection of benchmark highway bridges", Smart Mater. Struct., 18(11), 1-18.
  19. Malhorta, A., Carson, D., Gopal, P., Braimah, A., Di-Giovanni, G. and Pall, R. (2004), "Friction dampers for seismic upgrade of st. Vincent hospital, Ottawa", Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 1952.
  20. Martinelli, L., Mulas, M.G. and Perotti, F. (1998), "The seismic behavior of steel moment resisting frames with stiffening braces", Eng. Struct., 20(12), 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00202-2
  21. Marshall, J.D. and Charney, F.A. (2009), "Dynamic response of steel moment-frame structures with hybrid passive control system", Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and other Structures, ATC and SEI 2009, San Francisco, California, USA.
  22. Nagarajaiah, S. and Narasimhan, S. (2007), "Seismic control of smart base isolated buildings with new semiactive variable damper earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 729-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.650
  23. Potty, N.S. and Nambissan, S. (2008), "Seismic retrofit of elevated steel water tanks", International Conference on Construction and Building Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  24. Qiang, X. (2005), "State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia", J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(6), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005
  25. PEER (2011), Users manual for the PEER Ground motion database application.
  26. Rai, D.C. and Goel, S.C. (2003), "Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 59(8), 971-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00006-3
  27. SEAOC (1999), Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California.
  28. TEC-2007 (2007), Turkish Earthquake Code, Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions. Ankara: Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. (in Turkish)
  29. Teran-Gilmore, A. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2011), "Comparative seismic performance of steel frames retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces through the application of force-Base and Displacement-Based approaches", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(3), 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.003
  30. Termblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R. and DeVall, R. (2006), "Seismic testing and performance of bucklingrestrained bracing systems", Can. J. Civ. Eng., 33(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-103
  31. Tezcan, S.S. and Uluca, O. (2003), "Reduction of earthquake response of plane frame buildings by viscoelastic dampers", Eng. Struct., 25(14), 1755-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.07.001
  32. Uniform Building Code (1997), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  33. Yang, C.S.W., DesRoches, R. and Leon, R.T. (2010), "Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices", Eng. Struct., 32(2), 498-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.011
  34. Zhao, J., Wu, B., Li, W. and Ou, J. (2014), "Local buckling behavior of steel angle core members in buckling-restrained braces: Cyclic tests, theoretical analysis, and design recommendations", Eng. Struct., 66, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.008

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparative Capacity Assessment of CFRP Retrofit Techniques for RC Frames with Masonry Infills Using Pushover Analysis pp.2191-4281, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3488-4
  2. Effect of soil-structure interaction on seismic damage of mid-rise reinforced concrete structures retrofitted by FRP composites vol.15, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.3.307
  3. Seismic performance evaluation of steel frame structures equipped with tuned liquid dampers vol.19, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0082-8
  4. Case study on seismic retrofit and cost assessment for a school building vol.73, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.1.053