Journal of Energy Engineering (에너지공학)

The Korean Society for Energy (한국에너지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis on the Role of the Oil Refinery Industry in the Korean and Japanese National Economy

한국 및 일본 정유산업의 국민경제적 역할 비교 분석

  • Jin, Se-Jun (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Ahn, So-Yeon (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Yoo, Seung-Hoon (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
  • 진세준 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 안소연 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과) ;
  • 유승훈 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.06
  • Accepted : 2016.12.16
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempts to compare the role of the oil refinery industry in the Korean and Japanese national economy using an inter-industry analysis. First of all, the study conducts a comparative analysis on production-inducing effects and value-added creation effects of the oil refinery industry based on demand-driven model. Moreover, we investigate the supply shortage effects and sectoral pervasive effects of price change by using supply-driven model and Leontief price model, respectively. These analyses have been done by specifying the oil refinery industry as not endogenous but exogenous. The results show that1 won of production or investment in the oil refinery industry induces 0.2620 won and 0.6537 won of production in other industries of Korea and Japan, respectively. The former is less than the latter. It also creates 0.0946 won and 0.0536 won of value-added in other industries of Korea and Japan, respectively. The first is larger than the second. The effects of 1 won of supply shortage in oil refinery industry on other industries are computed to be 0.9657 won and 1.4476 won for Korea and Japan, respectively, and thus the former is smaller than the latter. Finally, the pervasive effects of 10% price change in oil refinery industry are estimated to be 0.3819% and 0.3409% in Korea and Japan, respectively, and thus the first is larger than the second.

석유제품은 한국 및 일본 모두에서 1차 에너지원 중 소비 비중이 가장 높다. 이에 본 논문에서는 산업연관분석을 이용하여 한국 및 일본 정유산업의 국민경제적 역할을 비교 분석해 보고자 한다. 먼저 수요유도형 모형을 이용하여 정유산업의 생산유발효과 및 부가가치 유발효과를 살펴본다. 다음으로 공급유도형 모형 및 레온티에프 가격모형을 적용하여 각각 정유산업의 공급지장효과 및 물가파급효과를 분석한다. 이 과정에서 정유산업을 내생부문이 아닌 외생부문으로 다룸으로써 정유산업을 중심으로 한 논의결과를 제시한다. 수요유도형 모형의 분석 결과, 정유산업에서의 1원 생산이 타 산업에 미치는 생산유발효과는 한국 0.2620원 및 일본 0.6537원으로 일본의 값이 더 크다. 하지만 타 산업 부가가치 유발효과를 분석한 결과 각각 0.0946원 및 0.0536원으로 한국의 값이 일본의 값보다 크다. 정유산업 산출물 1원 어치의 공급지장이 타 산업에 미치는 부정적 생산차질효과를 의미하는 공급지장효과를 살펴보면, 한국 0.9657원 및 일본 1.4476원으로 일본 정유산업의 공급지장효과가 더 큰 것으로 분석되었다. 정유산업의 산출물 가격 10% 인상으로 인한 물가파급효과는 한국 0.3819% 및 일본 0.3409%로 한국의 값이 더 큰 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, M., D'Arrigo, R., Petter, C., and Galli, A., 2016, How resource-poor countries in Asia are securing stable long-term reserves: Comparing Japan's and South Korea's approaches, Resources Policy, Vol. 47, pp. 51-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.12.001
  2. Bank of Korea, 2014, The commentary of interindustry analysis, Bank of Korea Press, Seoul
  3. Bank of Korea, 2016, 2014 Input-output tables, Economic Statistics System, http://www.bok.or.kr
  4. Cho, Y. C., Lee, Y. H., Yoo, S. H., 2015a, The supply shortage effects of oil refinery industry in Korea, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 24. No. 3, pp. 164-172 https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2015.24.3.164
  5. Cho, Y. C., Lee, Y. H., Yoo, S. H., 2015b, An analysis on the pervasive effects of price change in oil refinery industry in Korea, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 248-258
  6. Hellenic shipping news world wide., 2015, EIA: South Korea oil market overview, http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/eia-south-korea-oil-market-overview/
  7. Heo, J. Y., Yoo, S. H., Kwak, S. J., 2010, The role of the oil industry in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 327-336 https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802533880
  8. Hirschman, A. O., 1958, The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press
  9. Hydrocarbons-technology.com., 2013, The 10 biggest oil refining countries, http://www.hydrocarbons- technology.com/features/featurethe-10-biggestoil- refining-countries/
  10. Jin, S. J., Park, S. H., Yoo, S. H., 2016, Estimating the market size of the marine environmental industries and analyzing their economic effects, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 536-546 https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.5.536
  11. Jones, L. P., 1976, The measurement of Hischmanian linkage hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, pp.323-333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884635
  12. Kim, H. Y., Song, T. H., Yoo, S. H., 2015, Using the demand-driven model-based inter-industry analysis to examine the economic effects of petroleum refinery Sector, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 1, 104-113 https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2015.24.1.104
  13. Kim, J., Jung, D. W., Yoo, S. H., 2016, Analyzing the market size and the economic effects of the oceans and fisheries industry, Ocean and Polar Research, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 59-70 https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2016.38.1.059
  14. Korea Energy Economics Institute, 2015, Recent changes the oil refining industry's Policy Implications in Japan, World Energy Market Insight Weekly, Vol.15, No.15, pp. 3-12
  15. Kwak, S. J., Yoo, S. H., Chang, J.I., 2005, The role of the maritime industry in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis, Marine Policy, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 371-383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.06.004
  16. Kwak, S. Y., Yoo, S. H., 2010, A multi-period analysis on the economic impacts of the advertising industry, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 2789-2810
  17. Lee, D. S., Oh, S.S., 2011, Future downstream strategies for the Korean oil industry, Korea Energy Economics Institute Press, Eui-wang
  18. Lee, M. K., Yoo, S. H., 2014, The role of the capture fisheries and aquaculture sectors in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis, Marine Policy, Vol. 44, pp. 448-456 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.10.014
  19. Lee, M. K., Yoo, S. H., 2016, The role of transportation sectors in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 93, pp. 13-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.016
  20. Lim, Y. T., 2009, Effectiveness of call rate policy and prices spreading path by oil-price run-up, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 337-36
  21. Lim, S. Y., Song, T. H., Yoo, S. H., 2013, Analyzing the impact of increase in energy on the general price level, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 376-385 https://doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2013.22.4.376
  22. Miller, R. E., and Blair, P. D., 2009, Input-output analysis: foundations and extension. 2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  23. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, 2016, Input-output tables for Japan in 2011, http://www.meti.go.jp
  24. Oosterhaven, J., 1996, Leontief versus Ghoshian price and quantity models. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 750-759 https://doi.org/10.2307/1060892
  25. Yoo, S. H., Yang, C. Y., 1999, Role of water utility in the Korean national economy, International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol. 15, pp. 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629948745
  26. Yoo, S. H., Yoo, T. H., 2009, The role of the nuclear power generation in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis, Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 51, pp. 86-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.12.001