벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-12
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

중소·벤처기업의 기술사업화 애로요인에 대한 상대적 중요도 분석

An Analysis on the Relative Importance Evaluation of SMEs·Venture Technology Commercialization Problems Using AHP

  • 투고 : 2016.01.08
  • 심사 : 2016.02.26
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라에서 중소기업은 전체 사업체 수의 99.9%, 종사자의 87.5%, 전체 생산액의 47.6% 등 국가경제 전반에서 매우 높은 비중을 차지하고 있다. 이로 인해 중소기업은 고용창출, 기술혁신, 지역균형개발, 산업의 다양성 등 여러 측면에서 국민경제 발전의 실질적인 원동력이 되고 있다. 이에 정부에서는 중소기업 지원을 위해서 다양한 정책적 지원을 강화하고 있다. 그러나 정부의 지원 정책이 중소기업이 안고 있는 문제점과 애로사항을 충분히 해결하지 못함에 따라 그 지원의 실효성은 높지 않은 것이 사실이다. 우리 경제의 근간인 중소기업이 국가경제의 경쟁력 강화에 기여할 수 있도록 이들을 효과적으로 지원하기 위해서는 중소기업이 사업화 과정에서 겪고 있는 애로사항을 무엇보다 명확히 파악할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 중소 벤처기업이 기술사업화 과정에서 겪고 있는 애로사항 파악을 목적으로 애로요인들을 평가지표화 하고, 이들 지표의 중요도를 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)를 이용하여 분석하였다. 중소기업의 기술사업화 애로요인에 대한 선행연구와 전문가 면담을 통해 12개의 주요 항목을 추출하였으며, 요인분석을 통해 이들 12개 항목들을 기술요인, 기업내부요인, 기업외부요인 등 3요인으로 분류하였다. AHP 분석결과, 기업내부요인이 가장 중요한 요인으로 나타났으며, 그 하위항목으로는 '시장 환경'이 가장 중요한 항목으로 파악되었다. 본 연구의 내용과 결과는 공공 연구기관 및 중소기업 지원 기관이 중소기업의 기술사업화 지원 프로그램 기획과 지원 정책을 수립할 때 유용하게 이용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

In Korea, small and medium sized domestic enterprises(SMEs) play an pivotal role in the national economy, accounting for 99.9% of all enterprises, 87.5% of total employment, and 47.6% of production. and SMEs was driving a real force of the development of national economy in many respects such as job creation, innovation, balanced regional development, industrial diversity. The government has strengthened a variety of policy support to support SMEs. However, due to the mismatch between the difficulties of SMEs and benefits of government's policy, the policy implementation has not come out effectively. In order to effectively support SMEs, government must be a priority to know about the factors that experiencing difficulties in the technology commercialization process. The purpose of this study is thus to identify the major evaluation criteria through 3 level AHP analysis. First, 12 Critical elements are extracted from previous studies and professional interview and these elements are tied into 3 factors; technological factor, inner-organizational factor and Outer-organizational factor. The results of AHP analysis show that inner-organizational factor is more important and 'Market environment' in the inner-organizational factor is the most important element. The results of this research will be useful for public R&D institutions policy makers when establishing technology commercialization support policies and strategic planning of small and medium sized domestic enterprises.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bozeman, B.(2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle Revier, N. J. Prentice-Hall.
  2. Chatterjee, & Wernerfelt(1991). The Lnk Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120104
  3. Chesbrough, H.(2003). OPEN INNOVATION: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Cho, D. M., Choi, K. H., So, D. S., Suh, J. L. & Chae, K. S.(2010). R&D Projects's Commercialization Readiness Assessment, Conference on Industrial Engineers Spring 2010, Seoul; The Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers.
  5. Cho, I. H.(2005). The Study on development of performance Evaluation Model for Small & Medium Business Programs, Seoul, KOSBI.
  6. Choi, S. & Lee, M. H.(2014). The Analysis for the Determinant Factors on the Outcome of Technology Innovation Among Small and Medium Manufacturers, Conference on Business Administration Summer 2014, Seoul; Korean Academic Society of Business Administration.
  7. Choi, S. B. & Ha, G. R.(2011). A Study of Critical Factors for Technological Innovation of Korean Manufacturing Firms, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 24(1), 1-24.
  8. Choi, S., Lee, D. & Park, S.(2003). A Study on the Customer Satisfaction Index Considering the Demand on the Technologies, Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11, 135-145.
  9. Cooper, M. C., Labert, D. M. & Pag, J. D.(1997). Supply Chain Management: More Than a New Name for Logistics Strategy, Jounal of Business Logistics, 8(1), 1-13.
  10. Cooper, M. C. & Kleinshmidt, E. J.(1994). Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1150381
  11. Day, G. S. & Wensely, R.(1988). Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority, Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200401
  12. Di Benedetto, C. A.(1999). Identifying the Key Success Factors in New Product Launch, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(6), 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1660530
  13. Frenz, M. & Ietto-Grillies, M.(2009). The Impact on Innovation Performance of Different Sources of Knowledge: Evidince from the UK Community Innovation Survey, Research Policy, 38(7), 1125-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
  14. Frishammar, J. & Horte, S. A.(2007). The Role of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation for New Product Development Performance in Manufacturing Firms, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 765-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701711231
  15. Gonzalez-Benito, O., Gonzalez-Benito, J. & Munoz-Gallego, P. A.(2009). Role of Entrepreneurship and Market Orientation in Firms' Success, European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 500-522. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910935550
  16. Grimpe, C. & Sofka, W.(2009). Search Patterns and Absorptive Capacity: Low and High Technology sectors in European Countries, Research Policy, 38, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.006
  17. Han, S. L. & Wilson, D.(1993). Buyer-Supplier Relationship Today, Industrial Marketing Management, 22(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(93)90029-7
  18. Hitt, M. A. & Ireland, R. D.(1984). Corporate Distinctive Competence and Performance: Effects of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Size, and Technology, Decision Sciences, 15(1), 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01222.x
  19. Hong, Y S.(2012). A Study on the Factors Affecting Technology Transfer and Technology Transactions of Public Institutions, Issue Paper, Kiet.
  20. Hunt, S. D. & Morgan, R. M.(1995). The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition, Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900101
  21. Hwang, H. R., Kim, K, G. & Jeong, H. G.(2015). A Study on the Technology Commercialization Policy for Technology-based SMEs: Case on Daedeok Innopolis, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 39-52.
  22. Hwhang, H. D. & Chung, S. Y.(2015). A Measure on Technology Transfer Activation of Government-Sponsored Research Institutes Focusing on Companies in Demand: Focusing on the Cases in the K Research Institute, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(2), 318-337.
  23. Hyun, C. H., Kim, S. K., Park, H. Y., Lee, I. C. & Kang, E. H.(2015). Easy ICT R&D Technology Commercialization, Daejeon, ETRI
  24. Jang, J. H., Kim, W. S. & Lee, B. H.(2008). Study of Certification and Evaluation Program on Innovative Small and Medium Enterprises, The Social Science Research Institute, 24(2), 153-177.
  25. Jolly, V. K.(1997). Commercializing new Technologies: Getting from Mine to Market, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
  26. Katz, M. & Shapiro, C.(1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75(1), 424-40.
  27. Katz, M. & Shapiro, C.(1992), Product Introduction with Network Externalities, Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950627
  28. KBIZ(2015). Status of SMEs in 2015, Seoul, KBIZ.
  29. Kim, C. H., Ko, C. R. & Seol, S. S.(2012). Case Studies on the Failures of Commercialization of Technology, Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 15(1), 203-223.
  30. Kim, J. B.(2001). A Comparative Study on System and Measurement of Technology Valuation, Korean Policy Sciences Review, 5(2), 139-158.
  31. Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. K, Choi, K. H. & Kim, C. H.(2007). Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Global Outsourcing on Win-Win Cooperation between Large and Small & Medium Enterprises, Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 29(4), 153-170.
  32. Kim, Y. K. & Roh, C. C.(1997). An Analysis on the Insolvency of SMEs and Their Diagnostic Measures in Korea Using AHP, (The) Korean Journal of Fnancial Management, 14(1), 75-105.
  33. Knight, G. A. & Cavusgil, S. T.(2004). Innovation, Organization Capabilities, and the Born-Global Firm, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071
  34. Kongmanila, X. & Takahashi, Y.(2009). Inter-Firm Cooperation and Firm Performance: an Empirical Study of the Lao Garment Industry Cluster, International Journal of Business and Management, 4(5). 3-17.
  35. KOVA(2014). Survey report on SMEs of ICT Business, Seoul; KOVA.
  36. Ku, B.(2014). Derivation and Empirical Analysis of Critical Factors that Facilitate Technology Transfer and Commercialization of research Outcome, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Enterprenership, 9(5), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.1.201402.69
  37. Lee, C.(2000). Group Decision Making: Sejong Press.
  38. Lee, J. M. & Jeong, S. Y.(2011). An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Technology Commercialization in Korean SMEs, Conference on Technology Innovation Society Fall 2011, Cheonan; Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society.
  39. Lee, J.(2005). A Study on the Process of Connecting Government-Sponsored Joint R&D Projects with the Performance of Partners, Master's thesis, Seoul, The Korea University Graduate School.
  40. Lee, M. S., Lee, T. H. & Kim, J. S.(2010). An Analysis on the Important Weight of Evaluation Items in Technology Transfer using AHP, Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 11(8), 2758-2765. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.8.2758
  41. Lee, Y. D.(2014). Technology commercialization strategy and System, Seoul: Doonam Press.
  42. Leiponen, A. & Helfat, C. E.(2010). Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth', Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.807
  43. Lim, C. Y. & Lee, Y. J.(2007). An Analysis for Success Factor of Technology Transfer: From GRI's perspectives, STEPI.
  44. Mitchell, W. & Singh, K.(1996). Survival of Business Using Collaborative Relationships to Commercialize Complex Goods, Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<169::AID-SMJ801>3.0.CO;2-#
  45. Moon, T. S. & Choi, S. M.(2009). The Influence of Core Competence on Organizational Performance of Domestic Small and Medium Enterprise and the Moderating Effect of Technology Transfer, Journal of information systems, 18(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2009.18.4.001
  46. MOTIE(2014). The Guideline of Technology Valuation, Seoul. SMBA.
  47. MSIP(2014b). A Plan to Reinvigorate Government Funded Researcher's Commercialization Supports Plan for SMEs, MSIP.
  48. MSIP(2014a). The Plan for Technology Commercialization for the Diffusion of R&D Performance, Seoul, MSIP.
  49. MSIP(2015). Government's R&D Innovation policies, MSIP
  50. OECD(1997). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Integrating Technological Innovation Data, OSLO Manual(Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris).
  51. OECD(2007). Red Tape Scoreboard Annex on Academic Reports, Paris, OECD.
  52. Palma, A., Leruth, L. & Regibeau, P.(1999). Partial Compatibility with Network Externalities and Double Purchase, Information Economics and Policy, 11(2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(99)00006-2
  53. Park, H. W., Kim, S. K. & Kim, K. H.(2011). A Study on the Economic Useful Life Method for Determining the Technology Valuation, Conference on Technology Innovation Society Fall 2011, Cheonan; Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
  54. Park, J B., Cho, Y. A., Lee, S. K., Sung, Y. Y. & Kwon, Y. K.(2011). Promoting Technology Commercialization in the Korean Private Sector, Issue Paper, kiet.
  55. Park, J. B.(2008). Status and Position of Commercialization in Korea-Focused on Government Funded Technology, Issue Paper, kiet.
  56. Park, J. O., Youn, S. J. & Park, B. S.(2015). Commercialization Success Factors of Transfer Technology from Public R & D and Enhancing Performance, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(1), 28-48.
  57. Park, S. C. & Yang, D. W.(2010). The Empirical Study on Relationship Between SMEs' Technology Evaluation Index and Technology Commercialization Performance, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 23(1), 41-63.
  58. Park, S. Y.(2007). Development of a Categorized Checklist for Valuation of Patent Technology, The Journal of Intellectual Property, 2(1), 30-56.
  59. Park, W. & Park, H. Y.(2014). A Study on Business Ecosystem Model for Technology Commercialization: Focused on Its Application to Public R&D Commercialization, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 17(4), 786-819.
  60. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G.(1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review.
  61. Ryu, S. W. & Kim, S. Y.(2010). A Study on the Effects of the Choice of Policy Instruments on SMEs' Innovation, Korean Policy Sciences Review, 14(2), 65-90.
  62. Saaty, T. L.(1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, NY, McGraw Hill.
  63. Schere, F. M.(1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
  64. Seol, S. S. & Lee, K. H.(2002). A Study on Checklists for Technology, Market, and Firm Analysis, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 5(3), 227-292.
  65. Shin, T. Y.(2004). Behavioral and Dynamic Relationships Between Government R&D and Private R&D Expenditures: Complementarity VS. Substitutability, STEPI.
  66. SMBA(2014a). Overview of Budget and Fund in 2014, Seoul. SMBA.
  67. SMBA(2014b). Yearly Report, Seoul. SMBA.
  68. Suh, A. Y. & Shin, K. S.(2004). An Empirical Study on Success Factors of Supply Chain Management by Supplier-Buyer Relationship Type, Information systems review, 3(1), 191-203.
  69. Suh, S. H., Ko, J. W. & Cho, S. B.(2008). Factors Influencing the Consumer Adoption of Technological Innovations: An Exploratory Research, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(4), 450-475.
  70. Yang, D. W.(2005). An Empirical Study on Extracting Significant Technology Valuation Index of IT SMES, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 8(1), 277-295.
  71. Yang, S., Kim, M. & Jung, H.(2011). The Effects of Entrepreneur's Competence and Technology Commercialization Capabilities on Business Performance of Technology-based Start-ups, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 6(4), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.6.4.201112.195
  72. Yeo, I. G.(2002). Technological Assesment on Public R&D Activities, Conference on Information Technology Application Fall 2002, Seoul; The Korea Society of information Technology Application.
  73. Yoo, H. L. & Park, S. J.(2007). A Study on the Performance Analysis of Supporting Policy for SMEs R&D: Focused on the Industry-University-Institute Consortium Program, Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 171-195.
  74. You, Y. Y. & Roh, J. H.(2010). The Analysis for the Determinant Factors on the Outcome of Technology Innovation Among Small and Medium Manufacturers, The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 15(1), 61-87.