Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회지)

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Characterization of PM, PM10, and PM2.5 from Stationary Sources

고정배출원의 먼지 크기별 (PM, PM10, PM2.5) 배출 특성 연구

  • Kim, JongHo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanseo University) ;
  • Hwang, InJo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2016.09.09
  • Accepted : 2016.11.25
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the emission characteristics for PM, $PM_{10}$, and $PM_{2.5}$ in the various stationary sources. The particulate matters collected in the various stationary sources such as power plants (Coal and B-C oil), incinerators(municipal and industrial waste), and glass furnaces. The PM and $PM_{10}$, PM and $PM_{2.5}$, $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ samples were collected using the cyclone type $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ samplers and 30 species(19 inorganic species, 9 ionic species, OC and EC) were analyzed by ICP, IC, and TOR/IMPROVE methods. The mass concentrations of PM, $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ from nine stationary sources ranged $0.63{\sim}9.58mg/Sm^3$, $0.26{\sim}7.47mg/Sm^3$ and $0.13{\sim}6.34mg/Sm^3$, respectively. The level of $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ portion in PM calculated 0.63~0.99, 0.38~0.94, respectively. In the case of emission trend for species, power plant showed high concentrations for Al, Mg, Na, Si, V and $SO_4{^{2-}}$, respectively. Also, Ca, Fe, K, Si, $Cl^-$, and $K^+$ showed high in incinerator. In the case of glass furnace, Na, Pb, K, Si, $Na^+$ and $SO_4{^{2-}}$ represented high concentrations. Power plant showed higher EC/OC concentrations than other sampling sites. These results suggest the possible role for complement establishment process of emission inventory and emission management for PM.

Keywords

References

  1. Chow, J.C. (1995) Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 45(5), 320-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1995.10467369
  2. Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, D.H. Lowenthal, L.-W.A. Chen, and N. Motallebi (2010) Black and organic carbon emission inventories: Review and Application to California, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 60, 497-507. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.4.497
  3. Corio, L.A. and J. Sherwell (2000) In-stack condensable particulate matter measurement and issues, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 50(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464002
  4. Ehrlich, C., G. Noll, W.-D. Kalkoff, G. Baumbach, and A. Dreiseidler (2007) $PM_{10},\;PM_{2.5}\;and\;PM_{1.0}$-Emissions from industrial plants-Results from measurement programmes in Germany, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 6236-6254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.059
  5. Germani, M.S. and W.H. Zoller (1994) Solubilities of elements on in-stack suspended particles from a municipal incinerator, Atmospheric Environment, 28(8), 1393-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90202-X
  6. Hobbs, P.V. (1993) Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interaction. Academic Press, Inc., 75-93.
  7. Hopke, P.K. (1985) Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry, John Willy & Sons, New York.
  8. Hwang, I.J., P.K. Hopke, and J.P. Pinto (2008) Source apportionment and spatial distributions of coarse particles during the Regional Air Pollution Study, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 3524-3530. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0716204
  9. Jeong, Y.J. and I.J. Hwang (2015) Source apportionment of $PM_{2.5}$ in Gyeongsan using the PMF model, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 31(6), 508-519. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2015.31.6.508
  10. Kang, B.W. (1998) Source apportionment of $PM_{2.5}$ using a CMB receptor model: in Chongju area, Ph.D. thesis, KonKuk University.
  11. Kim, B.H. (1998) Glass technology, Cheong moon gak Publishing Co.
  12. Kumar, S., S.G. Aggarwal, P.K. Gupta, and K. Kawamura (2015) Investigation of the tracers for plastic-enriched waste burning aerosols, Atmospheric Environment, 108, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.066
  13. Meij, R. and H. te Winkel (2004) The emission and environmental impact of $PM_{10}$ and trace elements from a morden coal-fired power plant equipped with ESP and wet FGD, Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 641-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.012
  14. Minguillon, M.C., M. Viana, and X. Querol (2013) Particulate matter; Environmental monitoring and mitigation, Future Science Ltd. 9-20.
  15. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2015), Enforcement Rule of the Clean Air Conservation ACT.
  16. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2010) A Study for Establishing the Speciate of the Air Pollutants from Anthropogenic Sources in Korea (III).
  17. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2013) A Study on the Speciation and Control Measures of $PM_{2.5}$ from Large Stationary Emission Source.
  18. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2015a) Air Pollutants Emission Factors.
  19. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2015b) Fine Particulate Matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5) in Flue Gas.
  20. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2016) National Air Pollutants Emission 2013.
  21. Oravisjarvi, K., M. Pietikainen, J. Ruuskanen, S. Niemi, M. Lauren, A. Voutilainen, R.L. Keiski, and A. Rautio (2014) Diesel particle composition after exhaust after-treatment of an off-road diesel engine and modeling of deposition into the human lung, Journal of Aerosol Science, 69, 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.008
  22. Pacyna, J.M., K. Sundseth, E.G. Pacyna, W. Jozewicz, J. Munthe, M. Belhaj, and S. Astrom (2010) An assessment of costs and benefits associated with mercury emission reductions from major anthropogenic sources, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 60, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.3.302
  23. Pio, C., M. Cerqueira, R.M. Harrison, T. Nunes, F. Mirante, C. Alves, C. Oliveira, A.S. Campa, B. Artinano, and M. Matos (2011) OC/EC ratio observations in Europe: Re-thinking the approach for apportionment between primary and secondary organic carbon, Atmospheric Environment, 45(34), 6121-6132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.045
  24. Plaza, J., B. Artinano, P. Salvador, F.J. Gomez-Moreno, M. Pujadas, and C.A. Pio (2011) Short-term secondary organic carbon estimations with a modified OC/EC primary ratio method at a suburban site in Madrid (Spain), Atmospheric Environment, 45(15), 2496-2506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.037
  25. Seo, S.J., Y.K. Seo, Y.J. Hwang, D.H. Jung, and S.O. Back (2014) Application of adsorption sampling and thermal desorption with GC/MS analysis for the measurement of low-molecular weight PAHs in ambient air, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 30(4), 362-377. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2014.30.4.362
  26. US EPA (2014) Method 201A-Determination of $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ emissions from stationary sources (https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/emc/method201a.html).
  27. US EPA (2016) SPECIATE Ver. 4.4, https://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/speciate

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Measurement Methods and Size Fraction of Fine Particles (PM10, PM2.5) from Stationary Emission Source Using Korean Standard and ISO: Coal Power Plant and Refinery vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.4.342
  2. Comparison of PM2.5 Concentrations by Measurement Method vol.33, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.5.515
  3. A Study on the Change of Condensable Particulate Matter by the SO2 Concentration among Combustion Gases vol.34, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2018.34.5.651