The Study on Difference in Height Cognition Ability in Dominant and Non-dominant Eye

우세눈과 비우세눈의 높낮이 식별 인지능력 차이에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Yul-Jung (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Roi Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Yong (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Seoul Bukbu Hospital) ;
  • Sim, Hyun-Po (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Gangnam Severence Hospital)
  • 최율정 (로이병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 이준용 (서울특별시 북부병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 심현보 (강남세브란스병원 물리치료실)
  • Received : 2016.08.04
  • Accepted : 2016.10.12
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of height cognition ability according to dominant or non-dominant eye. Methods: Forty one healthy adults (male: 19, female: 22, 22-43 years) participated in this study. Hole in the card test was performed to identify dominant eye. To figure out height cognition ability between dominant and non-dominant eye, we had subjects answer which point is higher or even on the monitor. Results: The Right answer on dominant eye was $8.15{\pm}1.44$ point and the right answer on non-dominant eye was $7.56{\pm}1.55$ point. There was a statistically significant difference between dominant eye group and non-dominant eye group (p<.05). Conclusion: We think that the dominant eye may be used for reliable diagnosis. In future study, investigate on relation between dominant hand and dominant eye and the difference of dominant eye and non-dominant eye when to palpation are required.

Keywords

References

  1. 남건우. 우성안과 주동수가 길이 인지능력에 미치는 영향. 대한물리치료사학회지. 2009;16(4):59-65.
  2. 남건우, 박대성. 우성안에 따른 길이식별 인지능력 차이 에 관한 연구. 대한물리치료사학회지. 2008;15(4):11-16.
  3. 문현호. 3차원 깊이지각 과정에 미치는 시각장과 양안의 비대칭적 상호작용효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문. 2013.
  4. 박현주, 유근창, 김재민. 이안과 시기능과의 관계. 대한시과학회지. 2000;2(1):25-32.
  5. 박현주, 유근창, 김재민. 이안 검사의 비교 및 임상활용에 관한 연구. 대한시과학회지. 2000;2(2):161-167.
  6. 이완석, 예기훈, 안선정, 등. 연령대별 우세안과 비우세안의 비교 연구. 한국안광학회지. 2013;18(2): 203-211. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.2.203
  7. 이학준, 김창식. 초등학교 아동의 우위안과 교정굴절력에 대한 연구. 한국안광학회지. 2003;8(2):53-56.
  8. 한정훈, 김동섭, 신정철. 간헐 외사시에서 눈모음 검사를 이용한 우세안의 결정. 대한안과학회지. 2000;41(7):1592-1596.
  9. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, et al. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(11):1122-1126. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x
  10. Coren S. Sensorimotor performance as a function of eye dominance and handedness. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;88(2):424-426. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.424
  11. DeStefano LA. Greenman's Principles of Manual Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 4th ed. 2010.
  12. Greenman PE. Principle of Manual Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 3rd ed. 2003.
  13. Hayes J, Borges B, Armstrong D, et al. Accuracy of manual palpation vs ultrasound for identifying the L3-L4 intervertebral space level in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(5):510-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12355
  14. Jones LF, Classe JG, Hester M, et al. Association between eye dominance and training for rifle marksmanship: a pilot study. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67(2):73-76.
  15. Kim JT, Bahk JH, Sung J. Influence of age and sex on the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier's line in adults. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(6):1359-1363. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200312000-00018
  16. McGaugh JM, Brismee JM, Dedrick GS, et al. Comparing the anatomical consistency of the posterior superior iliac spine to the iliac crest as reference landmarks for the lumbopelvic spine: a retrospective radiological study. Clin Anat. 2007;20(7):819-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20531
  17. Porac C, Coren S. Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(3):208-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197803000-00011
  18. Portal JM, Romanco PE. Major review: ocular sighting dominance: a review and study of athletic proficiency and eye-hand dominance in a collegiate baseball team. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1998;13(2):125-132.
  19. Rabbetts RB. Bennett and Rabbett's Clinical Visual Optics. Butterworth-Heinemann. 4th ed. 2007.
  20. Shaw KA, Dougherty JJ, Treffer KD, et al. Establishing the content validity of palpatory examination for the assessment of the lumbar spine using ultrasonography: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012;112(12):775-782. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2012.112.12.775
  21. van der Wurff P, Hagmeijer RH, Meyne W. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Man Ther. 2000;5(1):30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1356-689X(99)90228-X