DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Microbial Composition Associated with Freshwater and Seawater

  • Lee, So-Yeon (Department of Medical Science, College of Medical Sciences, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Eom, Yong-Bin (Department of Medical Science, College of Medical Sciences, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2016.11.02
  • Accepted : 2016.12.08
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Knowledge of the distribution and biodiversity of environmental bacteria and the ecosystem that influences them is crucial for predicting an ecosystem. However, bacterial culture methods can only analyze approximately 0.1% of the existing microorganisms, those that are readily cultured under laboratory conditions. By contrast, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has generally been known to obtain more diverse profiling of bacterial composition. We compared the bacterial communities using both a culture-dependent (MALDI-TOF) and culture-independent (NGS) methods. Environmental specimens were obtained from both freshwater and seawater. Water samples were also analyzed by both pyrosequencing and MiSeq sequencing, in order to select one NGS platform which could analyze comparatively more diverse microbiota. Bacterial distribution analyzed with MALDI-TOF showed no difference between the microbiota of freshwater and seawater, whereas the results analyzed with NGS distinguished between the two. The diversity indexes of MiSeq sequencing were higher than for Pyrosequencing. This indicated that MiSeq sequencing is capable of analyzing a comparatively wider diversity of bacteria. The genus of Flavobacterium and Planktophila were identified as being unique to freshwater, whereas EU801223 and OM43 were found in the seawater. Difference between the bacterial composition of the freshwater and seawater environments was identified by MiSeq sequencing analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995. 59: 143-169.
  2. Bolhuis H, Stal LJ. Analysis of bacterial and archaeal diversity in coastal microbial mats using massive parallel 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing. ISME J. 2011. 5: 1701-1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.52
  3. Chapin III FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature. 2000. 405: 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012241
  4. Chong C, Pearce D, Convey P, Tan I. The identification of environmental parameters which could influence soil bacterial community composition on the Antarctic Peninsula-a statistical approach. Antarctic Science. 2012. 24: 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102012000028
  5. Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannell JW. Estimating prokaryotic diver sity and its limits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002. 99: 10494-10499. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142680199
  6. Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman RM, Ravel J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014. 2: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-6
  7. Fredricks DN. Microbial ecology of human skin in health and disease. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2001. 6: 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.00039.x
  8. Giovannoni SJ, Britschgi TB, Moyer CL, Field KG. Genetic diversity in Sargasso sea bacterioplankton. Nature. 1990. 345: 60-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/345060a0
  9. Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating highthroughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. The ISME Journal. 2010. 4: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.97
  10. Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM. Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol. 1998. 5: R245-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90108-9
  11. Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Welch DM. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biology. 2007. 8: 1.
  12. Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Welch DM. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environmental Microbiology. 2010. 12: 1889-1898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x
  13. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012. 62: 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0
  14. Li K, Bihan M, Yooseph S, Methe BA. Analyses of the microbial diversity across the human microbiome. PLoS ONE. 2012. 7: e32118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032118
  15. Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, Pallen MJ. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nature Biotechnology. 2012. 30: 434-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2198
  16. Madsen AM, Zervas A, Tendal K, Nielsen JL. Nielsen. Microbial diversity in bioaerosol samples causing ODTS compared to reference bioaerosol samples as measured using Illumina sequencing and MALDI-TOF. Environ Res. 2015. 140: 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.027
  17. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005. 437: 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03959
  18. Quince C, Lanzen A, Curtis TP, Davenport RJ, Hall N, Head IM, Read LF, Sloan WT. Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat Methods. 2009. 6: 639. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1361
  19. Piette MH, De Letter EA. Drowning: still a difficult autopsy diagnosis. Forensic Science International. 2006. 163: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.027
  20. Reeder J, Knight R. Rapid denoising of pyrosequencing amplicon data: exploiting the rank-abundance distribution. Nat Methods. 2010. 7: 668.
  21. Segata N, Waldron L, Ballarini A, Narasimhan V, Jousson O, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat Methods. 2012. 9: 811-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2066
  22. Stahl DA, Lane DJ, Olsen GJ, Pace NR. Analysis of hydrothermal vent-associated symbionts by ribosomal RNA sequences. Science. 1984. 224: 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.224.4647.409
  23. Suh SS, Park M, Hwang J, Kil EJ, Jung SW, Lee S, Lee TK. Seasonal dynamics of marine microbial community in the South Sea of Korea. PLoS One. 2015. 10: e0131633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131633
  24. Suh S-S, Park M, Hwang J, Lee S, Moh SH, Park KH, Lee T-K. Characterization of bacterial communities associated with seasonal water masses from Tongyoung in south sea of Korea. Ocean Science Journal. 2014. 49: 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-014-0019-4
  25. Tinta T, Vojvoda J, Mozetic P, Talaber I, Vodopivec M, Malfatti F, Turk V. Bacterial community shift is induced by dynamic environmental parameters in a changing coastal ecosystem (Northern Adriatic, Northeastern Mediterranean Sea)-a 2-year time-series study. Environmental Microbiology. 2015. 17: 3581-3596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12519
  26. Torsvik V, Goksoyr J, Daae FL. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1990. 56: 782-787.
  27. Torsvik V, Ovreas L. Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2002. 5: 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7
  28. Weber M, Teeling H, Huang S, Waldmann J, Kassabgy M, Fuchs BM, Klindworth A, Klockow C, Wichels A, Gerdts G. Practical application of self-organizing maps to interrelate biodiversity and functional data in NGS-based metagenomics. The ISME journal. 2011. 5: 918-928. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.180
  29. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998. 95: 6578-6583. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578