DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the effect of flipped learning using printed reading materials in an elementary science class of seasonal change

초등학교 계절의 변화 수업에서 학습안내 제시물을 활용한 거꾸로 수업의 효과 탐색

  • Received : 2016.10.05
  • Accepted : 2016.12.22
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of flipped learning applied printed reading material (PRM) and getting implications for the application of flipped learning applied PRM. For the purpose of this study, we made the flipped learning programs applied printed reading material and applied them to the 6th grade science class in the elementary school. Selection of the applied test is considered the special feature of flipped learning and existing researches about the flipped learning. The PRM contains the Science words, conceptions, explanation about contents. And it was added to checking system by quiz. The results were as follows: The science class applied PRM was effective on increase in Korean elementary school students' the curiosity (in Intrinsic Goal Orientation) and attention (in Task Value) about science class content. There were no significant difference in the results of academic achievement. But the improvement of students' academic achievement in class applied PRM were bigger than that of those in class applied existing methods that follow the process of the teacher's guidebook in the same way. Students had the highest satisfaction about communication and environmental education in the class applied PRM.

본 연구는 인쇄물 형태의 학습안내 제시물을 활용하여 초등학교 과학 수업에서 거꾸로 수업을 실시했을 때 어떤 효과가 있는 지를 알아보기 위한 것이다. 연구는 6학년 학생을 대상으로 실시하였으며, 학급의 학습 분위기와 성취가 유사한 2개 반을 선정하여 연구반(27명)과 비교반(26명)으로 각각 1학급씩 선정하였다. 연구반의 경우 인쇄물 형태의 학습안내 제시물을 활용한 거꾸로 수업을 적용한 과학 수업이 진행되었고, 비교반의 경우 기존 과학 수업의 형태로 진행되었다. 연구 결과 학습안내 제시물을 활용한 거꾸로 수업의 학습동기 측면에서 효과를 살펴본 결과, 내적 동기 영역에서 학생들의 호기심을 향상시키고, 과제가치 영역에서의 과학 수업 내용에 대한 관심을 높이는데 효과적이었으나 학업성취도에는 큰 차이가 없었다. 그러나 인쇄물 형태의 학습안내 제시물을 활용한 거꾸로 수업은 의사소통과 교육환경 측면에서 가장 큰 만족을 느끼는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, K. (2013). Flipping the core content areas: English. In J. Bretzmann (Ed.), Flipping 2.0: Practical strategies for flipping your class(pp. 23-36). Wisconsin, D.C.: The Bretzmann Group.
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2002). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, D.C.: ISTE; and Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  3. Bull, G., Ferster, B., & Kjellstrom, W. (2012). Connected classroom-inventing the flipped classroom. Learning and leading with technology, 40(1), 10-11.
  4. Bush, M. D. (2014). Educational technology points of inflection. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education, 54(2), 57-61.
  5. Choi, J. J. (1999). Studies on the effectiveness of the Cloze Test for elementary school students. English Linguistic Science, 2, 191-195.
  6. Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115.
  7. Covill, D., Patel, B., & Gill, D. S. (2013). Flipping the classroom to support learning: an overview of flipped classes from science, engineering and product design. School science review, 95(350), 73-80.
  8. Fawley, N. (2014). Flipped Classrooms. American libraries, 45(9-10), 19.
  9. Green, D. E., & McNeeley, M. F. (2013). Practice corner: Is radiology education ready for a flipped classroom?. Radiographics, 33(2), 533-534. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.332135003
  10. Jeong, J., Bae, J., & So, K. (2015). The effect of flipped learning of elementary science class on learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students. Biology Education, 43(4), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.4.333
  11. Korean Broadcasting System[KBS]. (2014). Flipped classroom![KBS Panorama 21th education revolution-finding the future class]. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  12. Kim, E., & Lee, S. (2015). The relationship among learning style, social emotional competency, academic achievement and satisfaction in social studies’ flipped instruction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(6), 367-387.
  13. Kim, S. H., Park, N. H., & Joo, K. H. (2014). Effects of flipped classroom based on smart learning on self-directed and collaborative learning. International Journal of Control and Automation, 7(12), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2014.7.12.07
  14. Lee, B. H., & Lee, H. C. (2016). The effects of science lesson with the application of flipped learning on science academic achievement and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.1.078
  15. Lee, H. S., Kang, S. C., & Kim, C. H. (2015). A study on the effect of flipped learning on learning motivation and academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(2), 47-57.
  16. Ministry of Education[MOE]. (2015a). The annou ncement of decision about the general and the particular introduction of 2015 revised national curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/106888/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=339&boardSeq=60749
  17. Ministry of Education[MOE]. (2015b). Elementary School 6-2 Science Textbook. Seoul, Korea: Mirae-N.
  18. Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A. M. (2015). The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today’s undergraduates. Journal of Animal Science, 93(7), 3722-3731. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9087
  19. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development[OECD]. (2005). Definition and selection of key competencies. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.
  20. Pienta, N. J. (2016). A "Flipped Classroom" Reality Check. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00996
  21. Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  22. Prud’homme-Genereux, A. (2016). Student-produced videos for the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 58-62.
  23. Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). "21st-Century" skills. American Educator, 17, 17-20.
  24. Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
  25. Shin, Y. J., Kim, J. S., Lee, S. H., & Ha, J. H. (2016). An exploration on the effects of elementary school science class applied flipped learning in the life domain. Biology Education, 44(1), 78-88.
  26. Shin, Y. J., & Ha, J. H. (2016). Analysis of science teachers' perception of flipped learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction, 20(2), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.2.152
  27. Shin, Y. J., Ha, J. H. & Lee, S. H. (2016). An analysis of the perceptions and difficulties experienced by science teachers in flipped learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0159
  28. Stannard, R. (2012). The flipped classroom or the connected classroom?: Looks at the benefits of putting more input online. Modern English Teacher, 21(1), 35-37.

Cited by

  1. e학습터 플랫폼을 활용한 원격 생물 학습이 초등학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향 vol.40, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.13