과제정보
연구 과제 주관 기관 : 명지대학교
참고문헌
- 김도훈 (2014). 미국 전자증거개시절차상 증거검색 및 수집방법에 관한 연구. 강원법학, 41(1), 217-252.(Kim, Do Hoon (2014). A study on the search and information retrieval methods in the U.S. E-discovery - Focusing on the technology-assisted review. Kangwon Law Review, 41(1), 217-252.)
- 김승범 (2015). 기록관리의 기회와 위협요인으로서의 전자증거개시(E-Discovery)제도 연구. 석사학위논문, 명지대학교 기록정보과학대학원, 기록관리전공.(Kim, Seungbum (2015). An analysis on E-Discovery system as opportunities and threats for record management. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Science of Myongji University, Department of Records and Archival Information Management.)
- 김영수, 홍도원 (2011a). E-Discovery 대상 ESI의 컬링 성능 향상을 위한 핵심 기술. 한국통신학회 학술대회논문집, 650-651.(Kim, Youngsoo, & Hong, Dowon (2011a). Core technologies for advancing curling performances of ESI concerning e-Discovery. Proceedings of Symposium of the Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 650-651.)
- 김영수, 홍도원 (2011b). E-Discovery 프로젝트: EDRM과 Sedona Conference. 주간기술동향, 1509, 14-27.(Kim, Youngsoo, & Hong, Dowon (2011b). E-Discovery project: EDRM and Sedona Conference. Weekly Technology Trends, 1509, 14-27.)
- 김일아 (2016). 전자증거개시(E-Discovery)에 대응하는 미국 기업의 기록관리 동향 분석. 석사학위논문, 명지대학교 기록정보과학대학원, 기록관리전공.(Kim, Il-a (2016). The trends analysis on the American business records management responding to E-Discovery. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Science of Myongji University, Department of Records and Archival Information Management.)
- 김종호 (2015). 세도나 캐나다 원칙상 전자증거개시제도의 준비에 관한 실무상의 문제점. 법학연구, 59, 147-183.(Kim, Jongho (2015). Some practical issues in the preparing for E-Discovery under the Sedona Canada Principles addressing electronic discovery. Law Review, 59, 147-183.)
- 안정혜 (2010). 국제중재에서의 전자증거개시. 중재연구, 20(2), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2010.20.2.67(Ahn, Jeong-Hye (2010). Electronic discovery in international arbitration - Focusing on the establishment of rules regarding electronic discovery. Journal of Arbitration Studies, 20(2), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2010.20.2.67)
- 이태림, 신상욱 (2012). 기업의 효과적인 소송 대응을 위한 전자증거개시 절차 모델과 대체 기술. 디지털융복합연구, 10(8), 287-297.(Lee, Tae-Rim, & Shin, Sang-uk (2012). E-Discovery process model and alternative technologies for an effective litigation response of the company. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 10(8), 287-297.) https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.8.287
- 전복만, 박지훈 (2012). 지식재산분쟁에서 중재제도 활성화를 위한 전자증거개시제도의 정비. 과학기술법연구, 18(3), 267-402.(Jun, Bokman, & Park, Juhoon (2012). A study on maintenance of the E-Discovery for intellectual property disputes in the arbitration. Institute for Law of Science & Technology, 18(3), 267-402.)
- 천우성, 박대우 (2011). e-Discovery 시스템 설계와 관리를 위한 인증과 암호화. 한국컴퓨터정보학회 학술발표논문집, 19(2), 139-142.(Chun, Woo-Sung, & Park, Dea-Woo (2011). Design of emergency response e-Discovery systems using encryption and authentication. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference, 19(2), 139-142.)
- 채은선 (2008). 디지털포렌식을 통한 E-Discovery의 실용화에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 동국대학교 대학원, 정보보호학과.(Chae, Eun-Sun (2008). A study on the practical use of E-Discovery through digital forensics. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Dongguk University, Department of Information Protection.)
- 탁희성 (2011). 전자증거개시제도(E-Discovery)에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국형사정책연구원.(Tak, Heesung (2011). A study on E-Discovery. Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.)
- Acosta, A. M. (2012). Predictive coding: the beginning of a new e-discovery era. Res Gestae, 56, 8.
- An ARMA International Publication (2012, November/December). Making 'predictive coding' pay needs cooperation. Information Management, 8.
- An ARMA International Publication (2013, March/April). Predictive coding to become an ethical obligation. Information Management, 12.
- An ARMA International Publication (2014, May/June). Predictive coding: Not just for E-Discovery. Information Management, 17.
- Debra, L. (2008). Using the electronic discovery reference model to process, review and analyze digital evidence. Gartner Research. ID:G00159094
- EDPB 공식홈페이지. Retrieved from http://www.edbp.com
- EDRM 공식홈페이지. Retrieved from http://www.edrm.net
- Schoenecker, E. Jr. (2015, April 4). Nine cases on predictive coding from modus. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/nine-cases-predictive-coding-from-modus-edward-schoenecker
- E-Discovery Team (2008). Thoughts on SEARCH and Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. Retrieved from https://e-discoveryteam.com/2008/06/08/hundredth-blog-thoughts-on-search-and-victor-stanley-inc-v-creative-pipe-inc/
- E-Discovery Team (2013). My basic plan for document reviews: The "Bottom Line Driven" approach. Retrieved from https://e-discoveryteam.com/2013/10/01/my-basic-plan-for-document-reviews-the-bottom-line-driven-approach/
- Issacs, L. (2013). Rolling the dice with predictive coding leveraging analytics technology for information governance. The Information Management Journal, 47(1), 23-26.
- Volinino, L., & Redpath, I. (2009). E-Discovery for dummies. New Jersey: Wiley.
- Pace, N. M., & Zakaras, L. (2012). Where the money goes: Understanding litigant expenditures for producing electronic discovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
- Swartz, N. (2006). New rules for E-Discovery. Information Management, 22-26.
- Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, et al., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 143 T.C. No. 9 (Sept. 17, 2014)
- EORHB, Inc., et al. v. HOA Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 7409-VCL (Del. Ch. Oct. 15, 2012).
- In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Product Liability Litigation, No. 611-md-2299 (W.D. La. July 27, 2012)
- In Re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, No. 3:12-MD-2391 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 21, 2013)
- Moore v. Publicis Groupe SA, 2012 WL 1446534(S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2012).
- No. 11 Civ. 1279(ALC)(AJP), 2012 WL 607412, at *3(S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012).
- Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale, S.A., et al., No. 1:14-cv-03042-RMB-AJP (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2015)