CGAM 열병합발전의 인수성능에 대한 페널티 비용 책정 방법론 제안 - Part II

A Suggestion of Penalty Cost Appropriation Methodology for Performance Acceptance Test of CGAM Cogeneration - Part II

본 연구에서는 CGAM 인수성능에 대한 페널티 비용 책정 방법론이 제안되어 있다. CGAM 성능시험결과 전기생산량에서 0.33% 감소, 전기생산효율에서 0.37% 감소, 열생산량에서 0.35% 증가, 열생산효율에서 0.31% 증가하였다. 페널티비용 책정 결과 전기생산량에서 -$22,138, 전기생산효율에서 -$24,348, 열생산량에서 +$11,661, 열생산효율에서 +$10,451로 산정되었다. 위 4 종류의 페널티 산정 계산은 명확하나, 총 페널티 비용은 위 4 종류를 어떻게 조합하는 가에 따라 달라진다. 계산결과 최대 -$46,486부터 -$13,898 범위였다. 따라서 총 페널티 정의에 대한 발주처와 건설사의 협의는 매우 중요하다는 것을 알 수 있다.

In this study, a penalty cost appropriation methodology for CGAM performance acceptance test was suggested. As the result of CGAM performance test, there were 0.31% decreases in electricity output, 0.39% decreases in heat rate on electricity output, 0.31% increases in heat output, and 0.23% increases in heat rate on heat output. As the result of penalty cost appropriation for above performance, the penalty cost was calculated as -$20,837 in electricity output, -$25,930 in heat rate on electricity output, +$10,340 in heat output, and +$7,715 in heat rate on heat output. Each penalty is appropriated as above fore kinds, however the total penalty should be determined as how to combine above fore kinds of penalty. In our calculation, the minimum total penalty was -$18,215 and the maximum total penalty was -$46,767. The methodology of total penalty appropriation should be determined in the contract between ordering organization and construction firm, and we can understand that it is very important.