한국응급구조학회지 (The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.65-79
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1738-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-2091(eISSN)
한국응급구조학회 (The Korea Society of Emergency Medical Services)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

응급구조학과 학생의 실습이 주관적 안녕감 및 삶의 영역별 만족에 미치는 영향: 경험에 대한 개방성의 조절 효과를 중심으로

Influence of field practice on subjective well-being and domains of life satisfaction in paramedic students: focused on control effects of openness to experience

  • 임낭연 (경일대학교 심리치료학과) ;
  • 이상구 (경일대학교 응급구조학과) ;
  • 김영화 (경일대학교 응급구조학과)
  • Lim, Nang-Yeon (Department of Psychotherapy, Kyungil University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Goo (Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Kyungil University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hwa (Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Kyungil University)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.25
  • 심사 : 2016.08.10
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the influence of field practice on subjective well-being and domains of life satisfaction in paramedic students. Methods: A self-reported questionnaire was completed by 143 paramedic students from March 5 to 31, 2016. The questionnaire consisted of subjective wellbeing, openness to experience, and domains of life satisfaction. The statistical analysis was done with SPSS/WIN 22.0. Results: The number of field practice had a lesser influence on degree of life satisfaction and positive emotions. Field practice did not influence negative emotions. Those who were open to experience tended to have higher degrees of personal satisfaction and competence irrespective of field practice. Conclusion: Openness to experience can enhance the life satisfaction and competence against the stressful conditions paramedic students experience in field practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kwon HR. Study on reality of field practice and improvements by students of dep. of emergency medical technology. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2002;6(6):15-26.
  2. Jang KA. Factors affecting clinical competency of dental hygiene students. J of Korea Converg Soc 2015;6(6):35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.6.035
  3. Song MO, Jang C, Lee DS, Sohn DH, Park YJ. The survey of awareness of decision on employment through the fieldwork for dept. of health-related students. Korean J Health Sci 2011;8(1):69-77.
  4. Park EH, Park HR, Kim HS. Approaches to convergence curriculum for healthcare-affiliated students with clinical competence assessment program. J of Korea Converg Soc 2015;6 (3):79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.3.079
  5. Park HJ, Jang IS. Stress, depression, coping styles and satisfaction of clinical practice in nursing students. Korean J Acad Soc Nur Edu 2010;16(1):14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2010.16.1.014
  6. Song SY, Han MA. Factors related to empowerment of paramedic students. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2016;20(1):17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2016.20.1.017
  7. Kim HS, Lee IS, Yang HM. The post effects of traumatic events experienced by paramedic students in clinical and field practice. J of Korea Society for Wellness 2015;10(4):327-39.
  8. Diener Busseri MA, Sadava S, Molnar D, DeCourville N. A Person-Centered Approach to Subjective Well-Being. J of Happiness Stud 2009;10 (2):161-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9072-3
  9. Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Potter PT. Cognitive Structure and the Independence of Positive and Negative Affect. J of Soc and Clin Psychology 2001;20(1):99-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.20.1.99.22255
  10. Schimmack U, Diener E. Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. J Res Pers 2003;37(2): 100-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00532-9
  11. Hwang SH, Uhm DC. Factors influencing the image about emergency medical technology jobs in paramedic students. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2014;18(3):63-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2014.18.3.063
  12. Park SM, Choi ES. Influencing factors on the satisfaction of the paramedic students in clinical training. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2012;16(1):91-101.
  13. Choi SS, Park J, Ryu SY, Han MA. Current status of clinical practice and associated factors with satisfaction among students in the department of emergency medical service. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2012;16 (2):9-22. https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2012.16.2.009
  14. Choi SS. Clinical practice satisfaction in the department of emergency medical service students. J of the Korea Acad Ind Cooper Soci 2013;14(2):759-67.http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.2.759
  15. McCrae, RR, Sutin AR. Openness to Experience. In M. R. Leary and R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 257-273). 2009.
  16. Paunonen SV, Ashton MC. Big five predictors of academic achievement. J Res Pers 2001;35(1):78-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2309
  17. LePine JA, Colquitt JA, Erez A. Adaptability to changing task contexts: effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Pers Psychol 2000;53:563-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x
  18. Hambrick EP, McCord DM. Proactive coping and its relation to the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Individual Differences Research 2010;82(2):67-77.
  19. Knofczynski GT, Mundfrom D. Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Educ Psychol Meas 2008;68:431-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164407310131
  20. Seo EG, Goo JS. A concise measure of subjective well-being (COMOSWB): scale development and validation. Korean J Soc Pers Psyc 2011;25(1):96-114.
  21. McAdams DP, Pals JL. A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist 2006;61(3):204-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
  22. Breitborde NJ, Srihari VH, Pollard JM, Addington DN, Woods SW. Mediators and moderators in early intervention research. Early Interv Psychiatry 2010;4(2):142-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00177.x
  23. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol 1982;13:290-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
  24. Paunonen SV, Ashton MC. Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;81(3):524-39. PMID: 11554651 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524
  25. Smith TW, Williams PG. Personality and health: advantages and limitations of the five-factor model. J Pers 1992;60(2):395-425.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00978.x
  26. Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Ann Rev Psycol 2003;54:403-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
  27. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 2004;36:587-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1