Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A literature review on implant abutment and soft tissue response

임플란트 지대주와 임플란트 주위 연조직의 반응에 관한 고찰

  • Lee, Young-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 이영훈 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 고경호 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2016.09.13
  • Accepted : 2016.12.08
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the implant prosthetic procedure, the soft tissue reaction was varied with the material and surface treatment of the abutment. It may be the cause of the peri-implantitis, and hence it can affect the long-term prognosis of the implant prosthesis. Titania and zirconia abutment presented superior biocompatibility and stable soft tissue reaction, while gold alloy abutment showed unfavorable reaction sometimes. A soft tissue reaction can be differed by the surface characteristics even in the same material type. Because rougher surface induces a bacterial attachment, the part contacting a soft tissue should have smooth surface. Additional surface treatment can enhance the cellular response without increasing bacterial attachment. Repeated removal and insertion of the abutment and the shape of the abutment may affect the soft tissue reaction, also. Ultrasonic cleaning and argon plasma cleaning are effective way to clean the retained micro-dust on the customized abutment.

지대주의 재료와 표면에 따라 연조직반응이 다르고 임플란트 주위염의 원인이 될 수 있다. 티타늄과 지르코니아는 우수한 생체적합성을 가져 안정적인 연조직반응을 보이고 금합금은 표면상태에 따라 연조직반응이 다르게 나타난다. 같은 재료라도 표면특성에 따라 연조직반응이 영향을 받는다. 표면거칠기 증가는 박테리아 부착을 유발하므로 연조직과 접촉하는 부분은 평활한 표면을 가져야 한다. 추가적인 표면처리를 통해 박테리아의 부착은 증가시키지 않으면서 세포반응을 촉진시킬 수 있다. 지대주의 형태 및 반복착탈도 연조직반응에 영향을 줄 수 있다. 초음파 세척과 아르곤 플라즈마 처리는 비교적 효과적으로 맞춤형 지대주의 잔류 미세입자를 제거할 수 있는 방법이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x
  2. Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:299-309.
  3. Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, May A, Aktas C, Mehraein Y, Lipp P, Kaestner L. Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1237-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12253
  4. Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennstrom J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:997-1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12223
  5. Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1992;63:225-35. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.3.225
  6. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x
  7. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02513.x
  8. Abrahamsson I, Cardaropoli G. Peri-implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:269-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01326.x
  9. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635-41.
  10. van Brakel R, Meijer GJ, Verhoeven JW, Jansen J, de Putter C, Cune MS. Soft tissue response to zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo within-subject comparison. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:995-1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01931.x
  11. Moon YH, Yoon MK, Moon JS, Kang JH, Kim SH, Yang HS, Kim MS. Focal adhesion linker proteins expression of fibroblast related to adhesion in response to different transmucosal abutment surfaces. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:341-50. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.341
  12. Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, May A, Aktas C, Mehraein Y, Lipp P, Kaestner L. Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1237-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12253
  13. Kim YS, Ko Y, Kye SB, Yang SM. Human gingival fibroblast (HGF-1) attachment and proliferation on several abutment materials with various colors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:969-75. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3704
  14. Rutkunas V, Bukelskiene V, Sabaliauskas V, Balciunas E, Malinauskas M, Baltriukiene D. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015;26:169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5481-8
  15. Lindhe J, Meyle J; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:282-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
  16. Agerbaek MR, Lang NP, Persson GR. Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy. I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01190.x
  17. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
  18. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292
  19. van Brakel R, Cune MS, van Winkelhoff AJ, de Putter C, Verhoeven JW, van der Reijden W. Early bacterial colonization and soft tissue health around zirconia and titanium abutments: an in vivo study in man. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:571-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02005.x
  20. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
  21. Salihoglu U, Boynuegri D, Engin D, Duman AN, Gokalp P, Balos K. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconium oxide and titanium alloys: an in vivo human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:101-7.
  22. de Avila ED, Avila-Campos MJ, Vergani CE, Spolidorio DM, Mollo Fde A Jr. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:428-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.016
  23. Yamane K, Ayukawa Y, Takeshita T, Furuhashi A, Yamashita Y, Koyano K. Bacterial adhesion affinities of various implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1310-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02574.x
  24. Kim HY, Yeo IS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Han JS. Initial in vitro bacterial adhesion on dental restorative materials. Int J Artif Organs 2012;35:773-79. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000153
  25. Kim ML, Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Byon E, Jeong Y, Cho LR. The effects of Mg-ion implantation and sandblasting on Porphyromonas gingivalis attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:245-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02138.x
  26. Kang SN, Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Byon ES, Jeong YS, Cho LR. Effects of Mg-ion and Ca-ion Implantations on P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum Adhesion. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;11:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-013-1104-y
  27. Sawase T, Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Albrektsson T, Baba K. Chemical and topographical surface analysis of five different implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001044.x
  28. Guida L, Oliva A, Basile MA, Giordano M, Nastri L, Annunziata M. Human gingival fibroblst functions are stimulated by oxidized nano-structured titanium surfaces. J Dent 2013;41:900-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.009
  29. Lee DW, Kim JG, Kim MK, Ansari S, Moshaverinia A, Choi SH, Ryu JJ. Effect of laser-dimpled titanium surfaces on attachment of epithelial-like cells and fibroblsts. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:138-45. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.138
  30. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricci JL. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009;18:57-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c5a6d
  31. Nevins M, Kim DM, Jun SH, Guze K, Schupbach P, Nevins ML. Histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to laser microgrooved abutments: a canine study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:245-55.
  32. Li P, Tong Z, Huo L, Yang F, Su W. Antibacterial and biological properties of biofunctionalized nanocomposites on titanium for implant application. J Biomater Appl 2016 ;31:205-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328216645951
  33. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histomertric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-83. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1372
  34. Alves CC, Munoz F, Cantalapiedra A, Ramos I, Neves M, Blanco J. Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection-a dog model study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:983-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12385
  35. Iglhaut G, Becker K, Golubovic V, Schliephake H, Mihatovic I. The impact of dis-/reconnection of laser microgrooved and machined implant abutments on soft-and hard-tissue healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:391-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12040
  36. Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of "platform switching": a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:90-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02196.x
  37. Huh JB, Rheu GB, Kim YS, Jeong CM, Lee JY, Shin SW. Influence of Implant transmucosal design on early peri-implant tissue responses in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:962-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12179
  38. Kim S, Oh KC, Han DH, Heo SJ, Ryu IC, Kwon JH, Han CH. Influence of transmucosal designs of three one-piece implant systems on early tissue responses: a histometric study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:309-14.
  39. Iglhaut G, Schwarz F, Winter RR, Mihatovic I, Stimmelmayr M, Schliephake H. Epithelial attachment and downgrowth on dental implant abutments-a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:324-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12097
  40. Canullo L, Micarelli C, Lembo-Fazio L, Iannello G, Clementini M. Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:328-36.
  41. Gehrke P, Tabellion A, Fischer C. Microscopical and chemical surface characterization of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment after different cleaning procedures. A qualitative analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:151-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.151
  42. Canullo L, Penarrocha D, Clementini M, Iannello G, Micarelli C. Impact of plasma of argon cleaning treatment on implant abutments in patients with a history of periodontal disease and thin biotype: radiographic results at 24-month follow-up of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:8-14.