Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회지)

Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Qualitative Elicitation of Multidimensional Korean Sensory Descriptors and Their Definitions Using Focus Group Interview

Focus Group Interview (FGI)를 통한 다차원적 감각 특성 용어 및 정의의 질적 도출

  • Hong, Jae-Hee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2016.02.16
  • Accepted : 2016.02.22
  • Published : 2016.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, food industries are increasingly interested in launching ethnic foods in the global market, but communicating sensory information to target consumers has been complicated due to the ambiguity and complexity of Korean sensory descriptors. This study was conducted to elicit various multidimensional sensory descriptors and their definitions using focus group interviews (FGI). Two consumer groups, consisting of 10 panelists in their 20s and 10 panelists in their 30-40s respectively, participated in the FGI. A total of 14 commonly used multidimensional sensory descriptors, including gamchilmat (감칠맛), gaeun (개운), goso (고소), gusu (구수), kkal-kkeum (깔끔), neu-kki (느끼), dambaek (담백), birin (비린), siwon (시원), sikeum (시큼), ssapssarae (쌉싸래), eolkeun (얼큰), jjapjoreum (짭조름), and kalkal (칼칼), were elicited. Their definitions showed that these descriptors not only were constructed using several sensory elements but also contained hedonic connotations. Descriptors such as gaeun, siwon, and kkal-kkeum were more closely associated with overall sensory impressions, including aftersensations and post-ingestive effects rather than sensory concepts. As individuals tend to weigh different elements to construct the concept for each multidimensional descriptor, further studies are required to identify elements consisting of these descriptors to develop better test methods and gain a clearer understanding of the sensory profiles of Korean foods.

Keywords

References

  1. Blancher G, Chollet S, Kesteloot R, Nguyen Hoang D, Cuvelier G, Sieffermann J-M. 2007. French and Vietnamese: How do they describe texture characteristics of the same food? A case study with Jellies. Food Qual. Prefer., 18:560-575 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.07.006
  2. Bom Frost M, Dijksterhuis G, Martens M. 2001. Sensory perception of fat in milk. Food Qual.Prefer., 12:327-336 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00018-0
  3. Brug J, Debie S, van Assema P, Weijts W. 1995. Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: Results of focus group interviews. Food Qual. Prefer., 6:99-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)98554-V
  4. Byrnes NK, Loss CR, Hayes JE. 2015. Perception of chemesthetic stimuli in groups who differ by food involvement and culinary experience. Food Qual. Prefer., 46:142-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.017
  5. Cha SM, Chung L, Chung SJ, Kim KO, Han GJ, Lee SR. 2010. Exploring Korean typical tastes, flavors and foods using Delphi technique. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci., 26:155-164
  6. Chung SJ, Lim CR, Noh BS. 2008. Understanding the sensory characteristics of various types of milk using descriptive analysis and electronic nose. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 40:47-55
  7. de Wijk RA, van Gemert LJ, Terpstra MEJ, Wilkinson CL. 2003b. Texture of semi-solids:Sensory and instrumental measurements of vanilla custard desserts. Food Qual. Prefer., 14:305-317 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00107-6
  8. Guerrero L, Guardia MD, Xicola J, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Zakowska-Biemans S, Sajdakowska M, Sulmont-Rosse C, Issanchou S, Contel M, Scalvedi ML, Granli BS, Hersleth M. 2009. Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study. Food Qual. Prefer., 52:345-354
  9. Guerrero L, Claret A, Verbeke W, Enderli G, Zakowska-Biemans S, Vanhonacker F, Issanchou S, Sajdakowska M, Granli BS, Scalvedi L, Contel M, Hersleth M. 2010. Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Qual. Prefer., 21:225-233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.06.003
  10. Hwang SH, Hong JH. 2013. Sensory drivers of goso flavor in soymilk: Understanding a complex traditional Korean sensory attribute. Food Qual. Prefer., 29:113-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.003
  11. Hwang SH, Hong JH. 2015. Determining the most influential sensory attributes of nuttiness in soymilk: A trial with Korean consumers using model soymilk systems. J. Sens. Stud., 30:425-437 https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12176
  12. Imm BY, Shon SS, Kim KN. 2003. Changes in perceived intensities of pungency of Ramen soup. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 35:623-627
  13. Johnson KE, Mervis CB. 1997. Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 126(3):248-277 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.248
  14. Kim JY, Cha SM, Chung L, Kim KO, Chung SJ. 2009. Developing an attitude scale for Korean style flavors. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 24:805-812
  15. Kim SG, Kim MH. 2015. Antioxidant activity and taste patterns of pine needle mustard sauce added with bitter melon. J. Foodserv. Manag., 18:29-45
  16. Kirkmeyer SV, Tepper BJ. 2003. Understanding creaminess perception of dairy products using free-choice profiling and genetic responsibility to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chem. Sense, 28:527-536 https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/28.6.527
  17. Kokini JL, Kadane JB, Cussler EL. 1977. Liquid texture perceived in the mouth. J. Text Stud., 8:195-218 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1977.tb01175.x
  18. Kokini JL, Poole M, Mason P, Miller S, Stier EF. 1984. Identification of key textural attributes of fluid and semisolid foods using regression analysis. J. Food Sci., 49:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13666.x
  19. Krueger RA, Casey MA. 2009. Focus groups, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp 63-131
  20. Labbe D, Gilbert F, Antille N, Martin N. 2009. Sensory determinants of refreshing. Food Qual. Prefer., 20:100-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.09.001
  21. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 2012a. Sensory evaluation of food:Principles and practices. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA, pp 257-258
  22. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 2012b. Sensory evaluation of food:Principles and practices. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA, pp 379-405
  23. Meiselman HL. 2007. Integrating consumer responses to food products. Chap 1. In: MacFie H. ed. Consumer-led food product development. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp 3-33
  24. Miller AE, Chambers IV E, Jenkins A, Lee J, Chambers DH. 2013. Defining and characterizing the "nutty" attribute across food categories. Food Qual. Prefer., 27:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.04.017
  25. Richardson-Harman NJ, Stevens R, Walker S, Gamble J, Miller M, Wong M et al. 2000. Mapping consumer perceptions of creaminess and liking for liquid dairy products. Food Qual. Prefer., 11:239-246 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00060-9
  26. Prescott J. 1998. Comparisons of taste perceptions and preferences of Japanese and Australian consumers" overview and implications for cross-cultural sensory research. Food Qual. Prefer., 13:489-495
  27. Samsung Economic Research Institute (SERI). 2009. Food Industry: New values and challenges. CEO information, 725:1-25
  28. Scriven FM, Gains N, Green SR, Thomson DMH. 1989. A contextual evaluation of alcoholic beverages using the repertory grid method. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 24:173-182
  29. Tan HSG, Fischer ARH, Tinchang P, Steenbekkers LPA, van Trijp HCM. 2015. Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Qual. Prefer., 42:78-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013
  30. Tournier C, Martin C, Guichard E, Issanchou S, Sulmont-Rosse C. 2007. Contribution to the understanding of consumers' creaminess concept: A sensory and a verbal approach. Int. Dairy J., 17:555-564 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.07.003
  31. Weenen H, van Germert LJ, van Doorn JM, Dijksterhuis GB, de Wijk RA. 2003. Texture and mouthfeel of semisolid foods: Commercial mayonnaises, dressings, custard desserts and warm sauces. J. Text. Stud., 34:159-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2003.tb01373.x
  32. Weenen H, Jellema RH, de Wijk RA. 2004. Sensory subattributes of creamy mouthfeel in commercial mayonnaises, custard desserts and sauces. Food Qual. Prefer., 16:163-170
  33. Westerink J, Kozlov S. 2004. Freshness in oral care: Attributes and time-dependency of a multidimensional, dynamic concept. J. Sens. Stud., 19:171-192 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2004.tb00143.x
  34. Zannoni M. 1997. Approaches to translation problems of sensory descriptors. J. Sens. Stud., 12:239-253 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1997.tb00065.x
  35. Zellner DA, Durlach P. 2002. What is refreshing? An investigation of the color and other sensory attributes of refreshing foods and beverages. Appetite, 39:185-186 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2002.0502
  36. Zhang T, Lusk K, Mirosa M, Oey I. 2016. Understanding young immigrant Chinese consumers' freshness perceptions of orange juices: A study based on concept evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer., 48:156-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.006
  37. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI). 2008. KREI policy seminar: Policy direction and issues for development of food industry. Available from http://www.krei.re.kr/, [accessed 2014. 11. 20]