한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.110-121
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

철도 궤도의 수명주기비용 분석 : 고속철도 자갈궤도와 콘크리트궤도 사례 연구

Analysis of Life Cycle Costs of Railway Track : A Case Study for Ballasted and Concrete Track for High-Speed Railway

  • 투고 : 2016.01.21
  • 심사 : 2016.02.12
  • 발행 : 2016.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

구조 형식이나 공법의 선정, 유지보수 시기, 보수방법의 결정 등의 의사 결정에서 수명주기비용(life cycle cost, LCC)의 평가가 중요하다. 철도 궤도구조의 경우 초기시공비 뿐 아니라 유지보수비가 총 비용의 상당 부분을 차지하고, 특히 자갈궤도일수록 그 비율은 더욱 높으므로 수명주기비용 평가의 필요성이 더욱 높다. 이 연구에서는 궤도 구조 형식, 연간 통행량, 축중, 열차 속도, 곡선 비율, 구조물(교량, 터널) 비율 등 다양한 설계변수를 고려할 수 있는 LCC 산정 모델을 개발하고, 각 비용의 산정에 필요한 기초 자료를 제시하였으며 구축된 모델과 자료를 바탕으로 주요 설계변수에 따른 고속철도 자갈궤도와 콘크리트궤도 LCC의 변화 경향을 분석하고, 이로부터 궤도 LCC 분석에 있어서의 고려해야 할 주요 변수를 검토하였다. 검토 결과 자갈궤도는 교체 및 운영 비용의 비중이 콘크리트궤도에 비해 현저히 높았으며, 연간 통행량과 자갈 탬핑 주기가 자갈궤도의 LCC에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 반면 콘크리트궤도는 초기 시공비의 비중이 현저히 높았고, 연간 통행량이나 열차속도, 축중 등에 상대적으로 영향을 적게 받는 것으로 나타났다.

In the decision-making, such as selection of structure, construction method, or time and scheme of maintenance, the evaluation of life-cycle cost(LCC) is of great importance. The maintenance cost occupy a large portion of the LCC of the railway track as well as the initial construction cost. Futhermore, the proportion of the maintenance cost is much higher in the ballasted track. Thus, the importance of the LCC evaluation is higher than in any other engineering structures. In this study, a LCC model that can consider various design parameters such as the type of track structure, annual traffic volume, axle load, train speed, and proportion of curve sections and engineering structures has been developed. Fundamental data for calculating costs also have been presented. Based on the model and data proposed, the trends in the variation of LCC according to the design parameters were examined and the most important design parameters in the LCC analysis of railway track were investigated. The results show that the proportion of renewal and operational costs is much higher in the ballasted track than in the concrete track, and the annual traffic volume and ballast taming period are most significant factors on the LCC of the ballasted track. On the contrary, it is revealed that the proportion of the initial construction costs in the concrete track is much higher, and the LCC of the concrete track is less sensitive to the traffic volume, train speed, and axle load.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S. H. (2008), Amendment and Complement of General Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study, Research Report, 5th ed., Korea Development Institute, Korea Ministry of Strategy and Finance (in Korean).
  2. Ando, K. (1997), A study on Load-Carrying Structures and Its Design for Low-Maintenance Track on Earthworks. (in Japanese)
  3. Chrismer, S. M., and Selig, E. T. (1994), Mechanics-Based Model to Predict Ballast-Related Maintenance Timing and Costs, Report No. R-863, SD-051, Association of American Railroads, 145.
  4. Dahlberg, T. (2001), Some railroad settlement models-a critical review, Proceedings of IMeCh F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 215, 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409011531585
  5. Esveld, C. (2001), Modern Railway Track, 2nd ed., MRT-productions, Zaltbommel.
  6. Hecke, A. (1998), Effects of Future Mixed Traffic on Track Deterioration, Report TRITA-FKT 1998:30, Railway Technology, Department of Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1998.
  7. Jang, S. Y. (2011), Development of Environment-friendly Track Technology (Precast Concrete Slab Track and Paved Track), Report, Korea Railroad Research Institute.(in Korean)
  8. Jang, S. Y. (2012), Planning of Development of Track Renovation Technology for Mitigation of Maintenance on Ballasted Track of High-Speed Railway, Final report, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement, Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.(in Korean)
  9. Jang, S. Y. (2014), Types of cracks and damage of concrete track at early ages in Kyeong-Bu high speed railways and its counterasures, Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute, 26(1), 54-58.(in Korean)
  10. JR East Japan (2006), Maintenance of Low-Maintenance Track (Shiankansen).(in Japanese)
  11. KRNA (2010), Handbook for Track Design, Korea Rail Network Authority.(in Korean)
  12. KRNA (2012), Guidelines for Track Maintenance, Korea Rail Network Authority.(in Korean)
  13. Lichtberger, B. (2011), Track Compendium, DVV Media Group GmbH, Hamburg.
  14. Park, J. B., Kim, L. Y., and Paik, J. W. (2006), A Study on the economic analysis for the gravel ballast and the concrete ballast track structures, Yooshin Technical Report, 13, 10-34.(in Korean)
  15. Patra, A. P., Soderholm, P., and Kumar, U. (2008), Uncertainty estimation in railway track life cycle cost: a case study form Swedish national rail administration, Proceedings of IMeCh F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 222, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT96
  16. Sato, Y. (1995), Japanese studies on deterioration of ballasted track. Vehicle System Dynamics, 24(Suppl.), 197-208.
  17. Sato, Y. (1997), Optimization of track maintenance work on ballasted track. Proceedings of the World Congress on Railway Research (WCRR '97), Florence, Italy, 16-19 November 1997, Vol. B, 405-411.
  18. Shenton, M. J. (1985), Ballast deformation and track deterioration, Proceedings of a Conference on Track Technology, University of Nottingham, held on 11-13 July 1984, pp. 253-265 (Thomas Telford Limited, London).
  19. Wilde, W. J., Waalkes, S., and Harrison, R. (1999), Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, Research Report FHWA/TX-00/0-1739-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
  20. Won, M., Hankins, K., and McCullough B. F. (1991), Mechanistic Analysis of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements Considering Material Characteristics, Variability, and Fatigue, Research Report 1169-2, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
  21. Zoetmann, A., and Esveld, C. (1999), Evaluating track structures: Life cycle cost analysis as a structures approach, Proceedings of the World Congress of Railway Research (WCRR '99), 19-23, 1999, Tokyo, Japan.

피인용 문헌

  1. 하중조합과 충전층 두께에 따른 3차원 유한요소 해석에 의한 PST 부재의 거동 분석 vol.22, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2018.22.6.053