한국주거학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean housing association)

  • 제27권6호
  • /
  • Pages.145-153
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-3571(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2257(eISSN)
한국주거학회 (The Korean Housing Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주거용 건축물의 재실자밀도 기준 적정성 평가에 관한 연구

A Study on the Adequacy Evaluation of Criteria of Occupant Load Factor in Residential Buildings

  • 투고 : 2016.11.30
  • 심사 : 2016.12.21
  • 발행 : 2016.12.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to grasp the effectiveness of evacuation safety design by verifying the appropriateness of the standard of occupant load factor for residential buildings. To this end, the definition and current standard of occupant load factor for residential buildings were analyzed, and the problems of the current standard were clarified by interviewing professionals. In addition, changes in occupant load factor were examined by year based on statistical research, and evaluation on the current standard $18.6m^2/pers.$ was performed. As for evaluation methods, the need of redesigning of evacuation capacity was investigated by using evacuation simulation. As a result of the analysis, the most serious problem was clarification of the applicable standard for residential officetel, where the average occupant load factor was $26.1m^2/pers.$, which was not appropriate. However, as a result of evaluation on evacuation capacity, although there was no difference between statistical research results and the current standard in terms of evacuation capacity, when the standard for business facilities was applied to officetel, evacuation time doubled. Thus, this study suggests that when the current standard is applied to residential officetel, it is necessary to separate between residential use and business use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Building Department (BD) (2011). Code of practice for fire safety in buildings, Part B, B4(Assessment of Occupant Capacity). Hongkong: Building Department.
  2. Census (2015). Population and housing census. Retrieved from http://www.census.go.kr
  3. Choi, J. H., Park, S. J., & Lee, D. H. (2016). The study on the characteristics of shared space composition of shared housing for one-person household. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 27(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2016.27.5.001
  4. Gan, T. X., Xie, X. G., & Hu, Z. R. (2013). Application of sample inventorying methodology in surveying occupant density at public spaces. Procedia Engineering, 52, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.114
  5. He, Y., Horasan, M., Taylor, P., & Ramsay, C. (2003). Stochastic modelling for risk assessment. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, Vol.7 (pp. 333-344), Australia.
  6. Hwang, E. K., & Youn, H. J. (2011). A basic survey for the guideline of the office occupant load. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 11(6), 45-51.
  7. International Code Council (ICC) (2012). International Building Code. USA: International Code Council, INC.
  8. Kim, O. Y., & Moon, Y. K. (2009). Housing analysis of one person household. Journal of Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 7(2), 37-53.
  9. Kim, W. H., & Yoon, M. O. (1999). A review of evacuation computer model. Proceedings of Korea Institute of Fire Science and Engineering Conference, Vol.33, No.1, (pp. 155-160), Seoul, Korea.
  10. Magnusson, S. E., Frantzich, H., & Harada, K. (1997). Fire safety design based on calculations: Uncertainty analysis and safety verification. Fire Safety Journal, 27, 305-334.
  11. Ministry Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) (2014). C/VM2. Verification method: Framework for fire safety design. New Zealand Building Code Clauses C1-C6. Protection from Fire, Table 3.1(Occupant densities), Part 3(Movement of People), Occupant Numbers. New Zealand: MBIE.
  12. Milke, J. A., & Caro, T. (1996). Evaluation of survey procedures for determining occupant load factors in contemporary office buildings. Building and Fire Research Laboratory. USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  13. Mizuno, M., Harada, K., & Wakamatsu, T. (2004). Analysis on target safety level for egress from a fire room and a fire floor in typical office buildings. Fire Science and Technology, 23(5), 402-462. https://doi.org/10.3210/fst.23.402
  14. National Fire Protection Association(NFPA) 101 (2012). Life safety code. USA: National Fire Protection Association Editor.
  15. Park, T. B., & Park, Y. H. (1993). A study on the architectural planning of the density of the multiple housing (IV). Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 9(3), 53-66.
  16. Roper, D. C., & Briggs, L. J. (1935). Design and construction of building exits. National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publication M151. Washington: United States Government Printing Office
  17. Sanctic, G. D., Kohler, J., & Fontana, M. (2014). Probabilistic assessment of the occupant load density in retail buildings. Fire Safety Journal, 69, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.07.002
  18. Seo, D. G., & Hwang, E. K. (2016). A study on the establishment of occupant load density considering safety ratio of design. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 16(2), 24-33.
  19. Seo, D. G., Shin, Y. C., Lee, J. Y., & Kwon, Y. J. (2009). An investigation study on the coefficient of occupants density for performance evacuation capacity computation in buildings. Journal of Fire Science and Engineering, 23(5), 1-8.
  20. Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) (2013). Fire code 2013, Table 1.2A (Occupancy Load Tables). Singapore: Singapore Civil Defence Force.
  21. Wong, L. T. (2014). Occupant load factor in local residential old high-rise buildings. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, 6(4), 197-201.
  22. Wong, L. T., & Mui, K. W. (2006). Modelling transient occupant loads for offices. Architectural Science Review, 49, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2006.4907
  23. Yoo, H. Y., Park, Y. J., & Shim, W. G. (2009). A study on the current situation and characteristic of the residential officetel in Gangnam-gu, Seoul. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning and Design, 25(6), 91-102.