DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Housing Activities in Contemporary Indonesian Dwellings

인도네시아 현대주거의 거주행위에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2016.09.30
  • Accepted : 2016.11.23
  • Published : 2016.12.25

Abstract

Activities in the dwelling are inseparable from housing design. Spatial features often result from patterns of activities that take place within the dwelling. Activities are further elaborated to affect house plans, furniture, arrangement, and equipment. However, discrepancies still exist between housing design and behavior, where housing design often fails to accommodate activities and behavioral dimensions within the family and the dwelling. This paper addresses the relationship between dwelling activities and housing design by means of a qualitative study that aims to understand the needs of the Indonesian dwelling through activity analysis. To do so, the research adopts a methodology that involves collecting data from measurements of the house, house plan analysis, and photographs, in addition to in-depth semi-structured interviews with families. Taking Bandung as a case study, 9 houses and families were selected as respondents that share similar family life-cycles, number of family members, and building size. The findings from the study suggest that spacious and open plans are preferred by the family, while maintaining family privacy. Guest areas are used to host formal guests and to restrict visitor access in the house. Service areas such as kitchens and laundry areas are the core areas for household activities for cooking, laundry, and drying. To meet social activities such as community gathering, open plan design is necessary to allow flexibility of furniture reconfiguration to accommodate extra guests.

Keywords

References

  1. Abadi, A. A. (2007). Problematika penentuan sampel dalam penelitian bidang perumahan dan permukiman [Sampling problems in housing and settlements researches]. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 34(2), 138-146.
  2. Azra, A. (2006). Islam in the Indonesian world: An account of institutional formation. Jakarta: Mizan Pustaka.
  3. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (1996). Environmental psychology. Chicago: Harcourt.
  4. Coolen, H. (2008). The meaning of dwelling features: conceptual and methodological issues. Amsterdam: Proeschrift.
  5. Coolen, H., & Meesters, J. (2012). Editorial special issue: House, home and dwelling. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9247-4
  6. Dick, H. W. (1985). The rise of a middle class and the changing concept of equity in Indonesia: An interpretation. Indonesia, 39, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350987
  7. Geertz, C. (1962). The rotating credit association: A "middle rung" in development. Economic Development and Dultural Dhange, 10(3), 241-263.
  8. Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Washington: Optimal books.
  9. Gram-Hanssen, K., & Bech-Danielsen, C. (2006). House, home and identity from a consumption perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090410025816
  10. Hapsariniaty, A. W., Sidi, B. D., & Nurdini, A. (2013). Comparative analysis of choosing to live in gated communities: A case study of Bandung metropolitan area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.213
  11. Harun, I. B. (2011). Typologies of formal urban housing in Indonesia: Towards a taxonomy. Proceedings of 2011 Southeast Asian Housing Forum. (pp. 137-158), Seoul, Korea.
  12. Hematalikeikha, M. A., & Alinaghizadeh, M. (2012). Educational and practical approach to the study of native architecture-case study: Study of Qashqai tribe housing as one example of a sustainable native culture of Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.175
  13. Hilman, M. (2004). Perkembangan lokasi perumahan di wilayah Gedebage Kota Bandung akibat pemekaran kota [Housing location expansion in Gedebage district of Bandung due to urban development]. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 32(2), 157-160.
  14. Ilhamdaniah (2011). Kajian pengembangan lahan untuk kawasan perumahan Kota Bandung ditinjau dari aspek status kepemilikan tanah dan preferensi pengembang perumahan. Studi kasus: Kecamatan Gedebage, Kota Bandung [Study on housing land bank development in Bandung city by analysing land ownership and housing development preferences. Case study: Gedebage district]. Jurnal Majalah Ilmiah Unikom, 8(2), 243-252.
  15. Ju, S. R. & Kim, D. Y. (2014). A comparative study of housing consciousness and space usage between Korean and Chinese college students. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(4), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.4.111
  16. Kang, I. H., & Han, P. W. (2000). 주거의 문화적 의미 [Cultural meaning of housing]. Seoul: Sejinsa.
  17. Kennedy, R. W. (1953). The house and the art of its design. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp.
  18. Kim, D. Y., O, H. K., & Ju, S. R. (2013). A study on the belief and the architecture of traditional Javanese house. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 22(6), 199-211.
  19. Kim, D. Y., & Ju, S. R. (2016). Continuity and transformation of the traditional life style of Javanese houses-focused on Java traditional houses in Kotagede, Yogyakarta-Indonesia. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 32(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.2.157
  20. Kurniati, F., & Kusuma, H. E. (2014). Adaptasi perilaku dan modifikasi sebagai proses menciptakan hunian ideal bagi penghuni perumahan massal [Behavioral adaptation and modification as process to achieve ideal residence for mass housing residents]. Proceedings of Temu ILMIAH IPLBI 2014, (pp. 33-38), Palembang, Indonesia.
  21. Kusyanto, M., & Kusuma, H. E. (2015). Ruang keluarga yang ideal [Ideal living room]. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 4, 207-210.
  22. Lawrence, R. J. (1982). Domestic space and society: A cross-cultural study. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24(1), 104-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009804
  23. Lawrence, R. J. (1990). Public collective and private space: A study of urban housing in Switzerland. In Kent, S. (ed.), Domestic architecture and the use of space (pp. 73-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Meesters, J. (2009). The meaning of activities in the dwelling and residential environment: A structural approach in people-environment relations. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  25. Megawati, D. R., Ju, S. R., & Hanan, H. (2014). The trend of housing design and town planning of new towns in Indonesia. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(5), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.5.011
  26. Mo, J. H., Kang, S. J., Kwon O. J., Choi, J. M., & Kim, S. J. (2013). Analysis of the characteristics of residents' preference on LDK at small-sized according to lifestyle types by housing, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 24(4), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2013.24.4.083
  27. Park, S. B. (2001). A study on the housing needs model for the apartment unit plan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  28. Putra, G. B., & Ju, S. R. (2016). From colonial cities to dormitory towns: Housing development in Bandung, Indonesia. Proceedings of Spring Annual Conference of Korean Housing Association, Vol. 1, (pp. 131), Seoul, Korea.
  29. Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  30. Salim, F. (2012). Financial club discussion: Indonesia middle class. Retrieved from http://www.financialclub.co.id/images/agenda/financialclub20121025103020.pdf
  31. Tjahjono, G. (ed.) (1998). Architecture: Indonesian heritage, Vol. 6. Singapore: Archipelago Press
  32. Triandis, H. C., & Brislin, R. W. (eds.). (1980). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology volume 5. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  33. Triyuly, W., & Kusuma, H. E. (2015). Ruang favorit dalam rumah [Favorite Spaces in the House]. Proceedings of Temu ILMIAH IPLBI 2015, (pp. 191-200), Manado, Indonesia.
  34. Ulfa, S. M. (2011). Pola tata ruang dalam rumah tinggal kuno Desa Bakung Kecamatan Udanawu Blitar [The spatial structure patterns in ancient houses in Bakung village Udanawu district Blitar]. Jurnal TESA Arsitektur, 9(2), 62-122.
  35. Widya, D. (2001). Kajian arsitektur rumah tinggal tradisional Minangkabau Nagari Panyalaian Kabupaten Tanah Datar [Study on Minangkabau traditional house architecture in Panyalaian village of Tanah Datar regency]. Master dissertation, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia.
  36. Yim, M. S., Lee, Y. M., Baik, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2000). Development of planning guidelines of KNHC's housing. Gyeonggi: Housing Research institute Korea National Housing Corporation.
  37. Zain, Z. (2012). Analisis bentuk dan ruang pada rumah Melayu tradisional di Kota Sambas Kalimantan Barat [Space and form analysis in the Malay traditional house in Sambas City, West Kalimantan]. Jurnal Arsitektur Nalars, 11(1), 39-62.