DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소비자 관점에서 본 주택 및 인테리어 하자 실태 분석 및 인테리어 서비스 평가

Analysis on Defect Disputes in Housing & Interior Design from Consumers' Perspective and Interior Design Service Evaluation

  • 이소영 (중앙대학교 실내환경디자인) ;
  • 전경민 (중앙대학교 디자인학부)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.26
  • 심사 : 2016.10.17
  • 발행 : 2016.10.25

초록

The purpose of the study was to investigate defect cases in residential interior design, to identify the state of defects, and to categorize types of defect and disputes. In addition, consumer appraisal to residential interior design service were analyzed. The results of this study could provide fundamental information regarding the defects and claims in residential interior design. First, we did literature review for defect disputes in architectural design and interior design. We identify the definition of defects by building life cycle, by state of construction, by activity, and by design performance. Second, we analysed interior design defects cases reported in Korea Consumer Agency & Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. A total of 49 cases of defect disputes in residential interior design from 2000 to 2015 were investigated. As a result, many defects appeared during the construction stage. A majority of defects cases fall into insulation, water-proofing/leakage work. In terms of design aspects claim, functional and aesthetic defects were claimed. Third, from Consumer Market Evaluation Indicators, raw data from 500 respondents were investigated for the housing repair and interior design. It is found that information comparability, responsiveness to consumer claim, price, and safety are important factors for consumer satisfaction in interior design.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Construction Defect Inspection (2016). Picture of defect case. Retrieved from http://blog.daum.net/rapcool
  2. Doo, S. K. (2010). Defect dispute system improvement and countermeasures related on apartment house-Focused on major legal issue related on defect wawsuit. Construction Issue Focus, 1-30.
  3. Ha, H. Y., Lee, H. K. Lee, Y. S., & Kim, J. J. (2007). A study on the management of defect prevention based on a defect bond. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 23(10), 147-155.
  4. House Inspection, Defect classification (2016). Retrieved from http://www.kihi.org/1/sb02/sb02_02_01.html?tb=2
  5. Hue, M. Y., & Jung, Y. H. (2015). Comsumer markets evaluation indicators in Korea. Eumseong: Korea Consumer Agency.
  6. Kim, Y. H. (2003). A study on the improvements of responsibility system in the flaw repair of public residences. Journal of Korea Real Estate Society, 21(12), 129-141.
  7. Korea Consumer Agency (2014, 2015). Defect case. Retrieved from https://www.kca.go.kr/index.do
  8. Kwon, E. J. (2009). The improvement plan on settling defect disputes about cracks in apartment buildings. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Inchon, Inchon, Korea.
  9. Lee, M. G. (2014). A study on the conflict resolution method of Apartment House. Journal of Public Society, 4(1), 160-187.
  10. Ministry of Transportation: Defect dispute Committee (2016). Defect case. Retrieved from http://www.adc.go.kr/ com/mainForm.do
  11. NEWSIS (2014). 75% of interior construction did not receive compensation. Retrieved from in http://www.newsis. com/ar_detail/view.html?ar_id=NISX20140325_ 0012809353&cID=10401&pID=10400
  12. Picture of Defect case (2016). Retrieved from https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsO_YPz6bsI