DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Essentials of Fashion as art from the Perspective of George Dickie's Institutional Theory of Art -Focus on the Structural Elements of the Fashion World-

디키의 <예술제도론>의 관점에서 본 예술로서의 패션의 본질 -패션계의 구성요소를 중심으로-

  • Suh, Seunghee (Dept. of Fashion design, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 서승희 (성균관대학교 의상학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.28
  • Accepted : 2016.11.20
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to interpret the artistic nature of fashion from the point of view of George Dickie's Institutional theory of art, which defined art from a sociological context. Five notions to formulate the institutional definition of art were regarding the artist, work of art, public, artworld, and artworld system. These notions were applied to the fashion world, and they deduced the definitions of a fashion designer, a fashion product, a fashion consumer, and the fashion system, which indicated fashion's social status in the art system. Firstly, a fashion designer plays a collective role in the product with an understanding of the consumers, professional knowledge of the design, and knowledge of making images of fashion products. Secondly, a fashion product involves artifactuality in the form of clothes created by collaboration among producers and it is transformed into fashion by collective activity of distributors and consumers. Thirdly, a consumer is a set of people who play a leading role in the assessment and consumption of the fashion product, allow the fashion designer to read his or her taste and reflect it in the fashion product although they are not directly involved in its production. Fourthly, a fashion system is a social framework for the presentation of a fashion product by a fashion designer to a consumer, and a social institution which enables clothes to transform into fashion through design, production, display, distribution, and sales. As a result, fashion is defined as an artifact in the form of clothes created by a fashion designer and presented to a consumer by the fashion system.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, D. V. (2010). Aesthetic Sociology (S. Choi & J. Han & E. Kim, Trans.). Paju, South Korea: Sallim Publishing. (Original work published 2003)
  2. Barthes, R. (2013). The Language of Fashion (A. Stafford, Trans.). Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 2004)
  3. Cho, K. (2006). "The Concept of Art, Moving Labyrinth". in Philosophy, Reads Art. Academy of Philosophy(Ed.). Paju, South Korea: Dongnyouk Publishing.
  4. Danto, A. C. (2014). After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. New Jersey: Princeton University Press
  5. Dickie, G. (1971). Aesthetics: An Introduction. Winnipeg: Pegasus publications.
  6. Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. NY: Cornell University Press.
  7. Dickie, G. (1997). The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Kentucky: Chicago Spectrum Press.
  8. Dickie, G. (2001). Art and Value. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  9. Hoengcheon, K. (1998). Status of Clothing Expression. (M. Han & M. Lee, Trans.). Seoul, South Korea: Kyungchunsa. (Original Work Published 1991)
  10. Lee, S. (1998). The Study on Fashion as a Genre of Art. Proceedings of Honam University, 19(2), 1191-1203.
  11. Lee, Y. (2007). Fashion as Art -Based on Morris Weitz;s Open Concept of Art. Family and Environment Research, 45(1), 1-7.
  12. Loschek, I. (2009). When clothes become fashion. New York: Berg.
  13. Kang, M. (2010). "Form". in Questions and Methods of the Aesthetics. Aesthetics Outline Publication(Ed.). Seoul: Seoul University Press Cultural Center.
  14. Kawamura, Y. (2006). Fashion-ology: An introduction to fashion studies. Oxford, UK: Berg.
  15. Kim, H. [Hae-Sook]., & Kim, H. [Hae-Ryeon]. (1998). Art and Thought(2nd ed.). Seoul: Ewha Women's University Press.
  16. Kim, J. (2002). What is Art? - Answer of Contemporary Angl-American Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Science of Art, 16, 139-156.
  17. Kim, J. (2012). Pluralist Aesthetics. Seoul: Chaeksesang Publishing.
  18. Kim, J., & Ha, S. (2007). Aesthetics. Seoul: Chaeksesang Publishing.
  19. Kim, N. (2007). "Plato's Art Interpretation". in History of Aesthetics. Aesthetics Outline Publication(Ed.). Seoul: Seoul University Press Cultural Center.
  20. Kim, S. (1993). A Brief Review of the Relationship between Fashion Design and Art. Proceedings of Hansung University, 17(1), 525-546.
  21. Kim, Y. (2007). "Thomas Aquinas' Concept of Ontological Beauty". in Aesthetics. Kim, J & Ha, S(Eds.). Seoul: Chaeksesang Publishing.
  22. Kwon, H. (2007). "Brief Study on the Main Streem of Western Ancient Aesthetics". in History of Aesthetics. Aesthetics Outline Publication(Ed.). Seoul: Seoul University Press Cultural Center.
  23. McCracken, G. (2011). "The Fashion System". in The Fashion Reader(2nd ed.). Welters, L. & Lillethun, A(Eds.). Oxford, UK: Berg.
  24. Miller, S. (2007). Fashion as Art; is Fashion Art?. Fashion Theory, 25-40.
  25. Oh, J. (2007). "Subsequent Anglo-American Aesthetics". in History of Aesthetics. Aesthetics Outline Publication(Ed.). Seoul: Seoul University Press Cultural Center.
  26. Park, Y. (2011). Demystifying the Arts through Creative Daily Life. Studies on Life and Culture, 19, 115-155.
  27. Suh, S. (2012). Artification of Fashion through the Expansion of Contemporary Art (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  28. Suh, S., & Kim, Y. (2013a). Fashion as Art through the Expansion of Aesthetic Concept of Contemporary Art and Fashion. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 37(4), 577-589. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.4.577
  29. Suh, S., & Kim, Y. (2013b). Inherent Properties of Fashion Accepted as Art through Expansion of Contemporary Art. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 63(3), 84-96.
  30. Yang, J. (2009). Philosophical Theories of Artworld and the Sociology of Art: A Comparison of the Aesthetic Theories of Dnato, Dickie and Wolff. Society and theory, 15, 159-193. https://doi.org/10.17209/st.2009.11.15.159
  31. Yun, Y. (2009). An Empirical Study on the Aesthetic Consciousness and the Aesthetic Enjoyment of Fashion as an Art. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 59(2), 42-58.