DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Anterior Approach to Entire Length of Humerus and to Distal Shaft for Fracture Fixation

  • Lee, Chul-Hyung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Tae-In (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jun Beom (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Sang Yeop (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital) ;
  • Rhee, Seung-Koo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.05.27
  • Accepted : 2016.07.19
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Background: The aim of study was to confirm the clinical effectiveness and results of wide and single anterior approach for fractures occurring along length of humerus. Methods: A total of 23 patients with humeral fracture were enrolled into our study who were able to participate in at least one year of follow-up. Seven patients had segmental comminuted humeral fractures and 16 patients had distal humeral fractures. We made various tractions of the muscles to expose the proximal and the middle third humerus between the biceps and brachialis and the distal humerus by partial splitting of lateral side of biceps through a single incision. Postoperatively, we measured the Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI). Results: we achieved bone union in all 23 patients. Solid union of the bone was achieved at an average 13.9 weeks. Postoperatively, two complications were observed screw loosening and nonunion. Revision surgery was performed in both patients. The patient with bone nonunion was treated using bone grafts. No postoperative infections or peripheral neuropathies were observed. At the final follow-up (average 20 months), we found that the average MEPI functional score of the patients was 91.7 points regardless of the fracture site. Conclusions: Our whole humerus with a single incision was effective for the treatment of segmental comminuted and distal fractures. we believe it is a useful alternative to preexisting methods of fracture fixation.

Keywords

References

  1. Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Nonunions of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(419):46-50.
  2. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):478-86. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200004000-00003
  3. Farragos AF, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Complications of intramedullary nailing for fractures of the humeral shaft: a review. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(4):258-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199905000-00006
  4. Shin SI, Song KW, Lee JY, et al. Treatment of two-and threepart fracture of proximal humerus using LCP. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc. 2007;10(2):204-11. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2007.10.2.204
  5. Vander Griend R, Tomasin J, Ward EF. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Results using AO plating techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):430-3. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668030-00018
  6. Yildirim AO, Oken OF, Unal VS, Esmer AF, Gelcek M, Ucaner A. Avoiding iatrogenic radial nerve injury during humeral fracture surgery: a modified approach to the distal humerus. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(1):8-12. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2012.2564
  7. Lee BH, Ha SH, Choi SJ. Treatment of supracondylar or intercondylar fracture of humerus in adult. J Korean Soc Fract. 1998;11(3):665-71. https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.3.665
  8. Park SW, Byun YS, Kang KH, Han SW. Treatment of the supracondylar or intercondylar fracture of the humerus in adults. J Korean Soc Fract. 1998;11(2):378-83. https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.2.378
  9. Rhee SK, Lee JY, Suh YJ, Lee JH, Ahn NK. Lateral approach for internal fixation of the distal humeral shaft fractures. J Korean Fracture Soc. 2004;17(2):83-9. https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2004.17.2.83
  10. Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, Mei GH. Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(7):531-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0313-z
  11. Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Liporace F, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques. J Trauma. 2006;60(4):830-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000195462.53525.0c
  12. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Demetrakopoulos D, et al. Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):1962-7.
  13. Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123(2-3):74-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-002-0465-9
  14. Mills WJ, Hanel DP, Smith DG. Lateral approach to the humeral shaft: an alternative approach for fracture treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(2):81-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199602000-00002
  15. Shin HD, Rhee KJ, Kim KC, Song HS. Operative treatment of traumatic humeral shaft fracture: comparison of interlocking IM nailing and plate fixation by posterior approach. J Korean Fract Soc. 2005;18(2):93-9. https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.2.93
  16. Kwon DG, Moon KH, Na SI, Shin BK, Lee TJ. Combined anterolateral and lateral approaches in treatment of extra-articular fracture of the distal humerus. J Korean Fract Soc. 2012;25(3):185-90. https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.3.185
  17. Kim YK. Humeral shaft fracture: plating. J Korean Fract Soc. 2008;21(3):255-60. https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2008.21.3.255
  18. Greiwe RM, Archdeacon MT. Locking plate technology. current concepts. J Knee Surg. 2007;20(1):50-5.