Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Interactive Anonymous "Must-have" Quiz: A Simple Method to Enhance Students Concept Learning in Organic Chemistry Course

  • Cha, Jeongho (Research Institute of the Korea Special Education, Daegu University) ;
  • Kan, Su-Yin (Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin) ;
  • Chia, Poh Wai (School of Marine Science and Environmental Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)
  • Received : 2016.08.09
  • Accepted : 2016.10.01
  • Published : 2016.12.20
Download PDF
rd to 6th Grade Elementary School Students" href="/article/JAKO201608965833239.page"> ⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Effective mastering and learning of basic organic chemical concepts is pivotal to ensure students continue to excel to the higher levels of organic chemistry learning. Concept learning is crucial for first-year organic chemistry students so that they can comprehend and understand a concept better and able to make connection to problems. In the present paper, the authors have implemented the Interactive Anonymous Quiz (IAQ) with "must-have" features in the organic chemistry course as a teaching tool to instill students' interest and enhance conceptual understanding in organic chemistry. The effectiveness of this activity was examined and evaluated through students' reflective writing. Students showed positive learning outcome on the implemented activity as reflected by the reflective writings. In addition, this activity could be employed as an activity to check on students' concept understanding, to instill students' interest in organic chemistry course and to improve on students' weakest topic in organic chemistry in the future classes.

Keywords

References

  1. Kean, E. Journal of Chemical Education 1982, 59, 956. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p956
  2. Yoder, C. H.; Leber, P. A.; Thomsen, M. W. The Bridge to Organic Chemistry: Concepts and Nomenclature; John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  3. Stavy, R. International Journal of Science Education 1988, 10, 553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100508
  4. Peterson, R. F.; Treagust, D. F. Journal of Chemical Education 1989, 66, 459. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p459
  5. Ebenezer, J. V.; Gaskell, P. J. Science Education 1995, 79, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790102
  6. Ayas, A.; Demirbas, A. Journal of Chemical Education 1997, 74, 518. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p518
  7. Flynn, A. B.; Ogilvie, W. W. Journal of Chemical Education 2015, 92, 803. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500284d
  8. Lynch, D. J.; Trujillo, H. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2011, 9, 1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9264-x
  9. Grove, N. P.; Bretz, S. L. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2012, 13, 201. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90069B
  10. Grove, N. P.; Cooper, M. M.; Cox, E. L. Journal of Chemical Education 2012, 89, 850. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200394d
  11. Aikenhead, G. S. Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-based Practice; Teachers College Press, 2006.
  12. Gilbert, J. K. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
  13. Hofstein, A.; Kesner, M. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702504
  14. Millar, R. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
  15. Pungente, M. D.; Badger, R. A. J. Chem. Educ 2003, 80, 779. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p779
  16. Gilbert, J. K.; Treagust, D. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education; Springer Science & Business Media, 2009; Vol. 4.
  17. Mazur, E. Peer Instruction; Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
  18. Sket, B.; Glazar, S. A.; Vogrinc, J. Acta Chimica Slovenica 2015, 62, 462. https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2014.1148
  19. Tarhan, L.; Sesen, B. A. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2012, 13, 307. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP90004A
  20. Stephens, C. E. Journal of Chemical Education 2010, 87, 1186. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100437b
  21. Nakhleh, M. B.; Mitchell, R. C. Journal of Chemical Education 1993, 70, 190. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p190
  22. Long, C. S.; Ibrahim, Z.; Kowang, T. O. International Education Studies 2014, 7, 37.
  23. Banks, T. Creative Education 2014, 5, 519. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.57061
  24. Wagner, B. D. Journal of Chemical Education 2009, 86, 1300. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1300
  25. Holme, T. A. Journal of Chemical Education 1998, 75, 574. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p574
  26. Kan, S.-Y.; Cha, J.; Chia, P. W. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2015, 59, 156. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.2.156
  27. Noh, T.; Scharmann, L. C. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34, 199. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<199::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-O
  28. Henderleiter, J.; Smart, R.; Anderson, J.; Elian, O. Journal of Chemical Education 2001, 78, 1126. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1126

Cited by

  1. "Spot the differences" Game: An Interactive Method That Engage Students in Organic Chemistry Learning vol.62, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.2.159