DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting Lamina Yield from Logs of Different Diameters for Cross Laminated Timber Production

  • Jeong, Gi Young (Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Jae (Department of Forest Sciences, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yeo, Hwanmyeong (Department of Forest Sciences, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, So Sun (Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.06.20
  • Accepted : 2016.09.06
  • Published : 2016.11.25

Abstract

The goal of this study was to predict lamina yield from logs of different diameter for production of cross laminated timber. Log characteristics of red pine (Pinus densiflora) and Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica), including diameter, length, volume, and defects were used for statistical and geometrical analyses, along with the lamina characteristics, including width, thickness, and defects. Based on the data obtained, the strong factors influencing the yield and grade of lamina from the two species were statistically evaluated. A geometrical approach was used for analysis of the yield from logs of given diameters. Statistical analysis showed that lamina yield was dependent on target lamina size but the grade of lamina was not related to any of the log characteristics. The suggested yield equations from the geometrical approach indicated an accuracy of less than 20% difference.

Keywords

References

  1. Gilmore, R.C., Hanover, S.J., Danielson, J.D. 1984. Dimension yields from yellow-poplar lumber. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-41. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 11.
  2. Hallock, H., Lewis, D.W. 1971. Increasing softwood dimension yield from small logs - Best Opening Face. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-166. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 11.
  3. Hallock, H., Steele, P., Selin, R. 1979. Comparing lumber yields from board-foot and cubically scaled logs. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-324. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 16.
  4. Hallock, H., Stern, A.R., Lewis, D.W. 1976. Is there a "best" sawing method? Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-280. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 12.
  5. Jeong, G.Y., Lee, J.J., Yeo, H.M., Hong, J.P., Kim, H.K., So, W.T., Chung, W.Y. 2013. Optimized lamina size maximizing yield for cross laminated timber using domestic trees. Journal of the Korean Wood Science & Technology 41(2): 141-148. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2013.41.2.141
  6. Korean standards association. 2004. Coniferous and broad-leaved tree sawn logs - visual defects - classification. KS F 4475.
  7. Korean standards association. 2005. Structural glued laminated timber. KS F 3021.
  8. Korea Standards Association. 2009 Measurement of sizes and determination of volume for saw-logs. KSF 2163.
  9. Lewis, D.W. 1985. Sawmill simulation and the best opening face system: A user's guide, Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-48. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 29.
  10. Lundahl, C.G., Gronlund, A. 2010. Increased yield in sawmills by applying alternate rotation and lateral positioning. Forest Products Journal 60(4): 331-338. https://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-60.4.331
  11. Maness, C.T., Lin, Y. 1995. The influence of sawkerf and target size reductions on sawmill revenue and volume recovery. Forest Products Journal 45(11/12): 43-50.
  12. Moberg, L., Nordmark, U. 2006. Predicting lumber volume and grade recovery for Scots pine stems using tree models and sawmill conversion simulation. Forest Products Journal 56(4): 68-74.
  13. Park, J.H., Kin, K.M., Eom, C.D., Jung, D.J. 2013. A study on log diameter classes of Korean softwood log. Journal of the Korean Wood Science & Technology 41(4): 337-345. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2013.41.4.337
  14. Richards, D.B., Adkins, W.K., Hallock, H. Bulgrin, E.H. 1979. Simulation of hardwood log sawing. Forest product laboratory. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-355. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 8.
  15. Steele, P.H. 1984. Factors determining lumber recovery in sawmilling. Forest product laboratory. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-39. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 12.
  16. Steele, P.H., Hallock, H. 1979. A mathematical model to calculate volumes of lumber and residue produced in sawmilling. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-336. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 44.
  17. Steele, P.H., Hallock, H., Lunstrum, S. 1981. Procedure and computer program to calculate machine contribution to sawmill recovery. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-383. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 20.
  18. Stern A.R., Hallock, H., Lewis, D.W. 1979. Improving sawing accuracy does help. Forest product laboratory. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-320. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp. 12.