Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contingent Valuation of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Prevention Projects

조건부가치측정법을 이용한 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업의 경제적 가치 추정

  • Received : 2015.08.10
  • Accepted : 2016.01.12
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the continuous expansion of highway network and its traffics, neighboring wildlife habitats are splitted into smaller and more isolated patches. The infrastructures contribute to the wildlife-vehicle collision by creating barriers to animal movement. This kinds of traffic accidents are dangerous factors to the drivers' safety and the facilities on the highway as well as to the wildlife themselves. One of the most common ways to prevent habitat fragmentation are fauna crossings and fences. The cost of the mitigation measures to prevent wildlife-vehicle collision could be monetized. However their economic benefits are difficult to be measured. Using contingent valuation method, this study tries to estimate the economic valuation of wildlife collision prevention projects on the Korean highways. The result shows that 43.88% of Korean household had the positive willingness pay to the projects. Moreover, we found that the recognition of the project or the favourable attitude to the environmental issues could raise the willingness-to-pay. Therefore, active public relation on the project could make the friendly public opinion and increase the number of the household which has the positive willingness-to-pay on the project.

고속도로 망의 지속적인 확장과 교통량 증대로 인해 고속도로에 인접하여 서식하는 야생동물의 생활권은 축소되거나 단절된다. 이는 먹이를 찾거나 번식지로 이동하는 야생동물들의 교통사고 가능성을 높인다. 야생동물 교통사고는 운전자의 안전 및 도로 시설의 위험 요소일 뿐만 아니라 야생동물 자체의 생명에도 위협이 된다. 야생동물의 서식지 분절을 막기 위한 다양한 방법 중 생태통로와 야생동물 유도 울타리가 대표적이다. 이러한 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업의 시설 설치비용은 명확하게 측정되지만, 편익의 경제적 가치를 측정하기는 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 조건부가치측정법을 사용하여 고속도로 상의 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업의 경제적 가치를 추정하였다. 추정결과에 따르면, 우리나라 전체 가구의 약 43.88%가 이 사업에 대한 양(+)의 지불의사를 가진 것으로 나타났다. 이와 더불어 환경문제의 인식이나 동 사업에 대한 사전 인지 정도가 높을수록 지불의사 확률과 지불의사액이 높아지는 것이 확인되었다. 따라서 해당 사업에 대한 적극적인 홍보는 야생동물 교통사고 예방사업에 긍정적인 여론을 형성하고, 동 사업에 양(+)의 금액을 지불할 의사가 있는 가구를 늘리는 데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Beckmann JP, Clevenger AP, Huijser MP, Hilty JA. 2012. Safe Passages: Highways, Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity. Island Press.
  2. Bissonette JA, Rosa S. 2012. An evaluation of a mitigation strategy for deer-vehicle collisions. Wildlife Biology. 18: 414-423. https://doi.org/10.2981/11-122
  3. Choi, TY, Yang BG, Yu BH. 2008. Overview of measures and research reports to mitigate road-kills in Korea. Proceedings of the Korean society of environment and ecology conference. Daegu: Korean Society of Environment and Ecology. 89-92. [Korean Literature]
  4. Clevenger AP, Ford AT, Sawaya MA. 2009. Banff Wildlife Crossings Project: Integrating Science and Education in Restoring Population Connectivity Across Transportation Corridors. Final Report to Parks Canada Agency. Radium Hot Springs, British Columbia. Canada.
  5. Conover MR, Pitt WC, Kessler KK, DuBow TJ, Sanborn WA. 1995. Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 23: 407-414.
  6. Conover MR. 1997. Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the Unites States. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 25: 298-305.
  7. Damarad, T, Bekker, GJ. 2003. COST 341 - Habitat Fragmentation due to Transportation Infrastructure: Findings of the COST Action 341. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.
  8. FHWA (The Federal Highway Adminstration). 2008. Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Reduction Study - Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation.
  9. Huijser MP, McGowen P, Fuller J, Hardy A, Kociolek A, Clevenger AP, Smith D, Ament RJ. 2007. Wildlife-vehicle collision reduction study - Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Washington D.C., USA.
  10. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevnger AP, Ament RJ, McGowen P. 2009. Cost-Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool. Ecology and Society. 14(2): Article 15.
  11. Iuell B, Bekker GJ, Cuperus R, Dufek J, Fry G, Hicks C, Hlavac V, Keller V, Rosell C, Sangwine T, Torslov N, Wandall B. 2003. COST 341 - Wildlife and traffic: a European handbook for identifying conflicts and designing solutions. KNNV Publishers, Brussels, Belgium.
  12. Korea Development Institute. 2008. A study on general guidelines fro pre-feasibility study. 5th ed. [Korean Literature]
  13. Korea Expressway Corporation. 2008. Comprehensive Expressway Ecological Survey and Wildlife Vehicle Collision Prevention Report. [Korean Literature]
  14. Korea Expressway Corporation. 2014. Wildlife collision prevention report. http://www.ex.co.kr/portal/cus/public_relations/eenvironment/wild_animals/1191372_3493.j sp?clickParentNum=3&clickNum=0.visited Dec. 22, 2014.
  15. Lee GJ, Tak JH, Pak SI. 2014. Spatial and temporal patterns on wildlife road-kills on highway in Korea. J Vet Clin. 31(4): 282-287. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.17555/ksvc.2014.08.31.4.282
  16. Lee JS, Choi EC. 2013. One and one and half dichotomous choice contingent valuation method - with the example of road kill reduction policy. J Korean Public Policy. 15(1): 137-158. [Korean Literature]
  17. Mastro LL, Conover MR, Frey SN. 2008. Deervehicle collision prevention techniques. Human-Wildlife Conflicts. 2(1): 80-92.
  18. McCollister MF, Manen FT. 2010. Effectiveness of wildlife underpasses and fencing to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions. J Wildlife Management. 74(8): 1722-1731. https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-535
  19. Ministry of Environment. 2007. Wildlife Roadkill Prevention and Management Report. Nature Policy Division. [Korean Literature]
  20. Ministry of Environment. 2010. Guidelines for Design and Management of Wildlife Crossing Structures in Korea. Natural Resources Division. [Korean Literature]
  21. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. each year. Road Work Handbook. [Korean Literature]
  22. Netusil NR. 2006. Economic Valuation of Riparian Corridors and Upland Wildlife Habitat in an Urban Watershed. J Contemporary Water Research & Education. 1334: 39-45.
  23. Park SS, Jeon GS, Lee CK. 2014. Valuing the restoration of the abandoned road. Environment Policy Studies. 13(3): 21-42. [Korean Literature]
  24. Park SS, Kim YJ. 2016. Normality, Heteroskedasticity, and Contingent Valuation Method. Unpublished manuscript. [Korean Literature]
  25. Spellerberg IF. 1998. Ecological effects of roads and traffic: A literature review. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters. 7: 317-333.
  26. Shwiff SA, Smith HT, Engeman RM, Rossmanith RJ. 2007. Bioeconomic analysis of herpetofauna road-kills in a Florida state park. USDA National Wildlife Research Center. Staff Publications Paper 623.
  27. Song JS Lee KJ, Ki KS, Jun IY. 2011. The Efficiency and improvement of the highway wild-life fences for decrease of mammals road-kill - In case of Manjong-Hongchun section on Jungang highway. J Env Eco. 25(5): 649-657.[Korean Literature]
  28. L-P Tardif & Associates Inc. 2003. Collisions Involving Motor Vehicles and Large Animals in Canada: Final report. Nepean, Ontario, Canada.