수산해양교육연구 (Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)

  • 제28권1호
  • /
  • Pages.91-105
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-8999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2049(eISSN)
한국수산해양교육학회 (The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교육공학에 대한 초등교사의 인식 : 메타포 분석을 활용하여

Awareness of Elementary School Teacher about Educational Technology through metaphor

  • 투고 : 2015.10.23
  • 심사 : 2015.11.16
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the awareness of elementary teachers about educational technology. Educational technology that is embodied at school was the form of "systemic structure" whose components are complex and exert close mutual influence on one another, rather than of "systemic assembly" that relationship of components were well controlled. A qualitative epistemological method was used to look into educational technology instead of existing empirical ones. Metaphor analysis was utilized among various qualitative research methods to find out what elementary teachers thought of educational technology. Six elementary teachers were asked to draw a picture to describe what came into their mind when they heard term of "educational technology," and they were interviewed in depth to check what their pictures meant. As a result, elementary teachers expressed their point of views about educational technology as "a scientific, technical and systemized instrument to stir up the learning interest and joy of students," "an action to mechanically fit together every part of education(curriculum)," "educational technology as a teaching and learning method," and "an integrated and overall system." This finding seemed to have something to do with media theory, teaching and learning theory and system theory that have been used in educational technology. This study was expected to be significance in that it investigated the way of looking at educational technology in the field, and confirmed the close relationship between theory and practice, and finally provided an opportunity to reflect on the ontological nature and epistemological method of educational technology.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Banathy, B. H.(1991). Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  2. Chung, Hyun-Mi.Yang, Yong-Chil(2005). "Journal of Educational Technology" 20 years: Analysis on research domains, research methods, and learning theories. Journal of Educational Technology 21(4), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.21.4.167
  3. Creswell, J. W.(2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  4. Diamond, M. R.(1997). Designing, Assessing Course & Curriculum - A Practical Guide (Revised Ed.). Josssey-Bass, A Wiley Company.
  5. Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J.(1979). Principles of Instructional Design. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winstone.
  6. Gibbs, R.(1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Hawkes, T.(1970). Metaphor. (Shim, Myung-ho, Translation. Eunwoo. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.)
  8. Holman, C. H.(1980). A Handbook to Literature (4th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
  9. Jaunszewski, A., & Molenda, M.(2008). Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
  10. Jo, Ja-Gyoung.Park, Ki-Yong.Kang, E-Cheol(2009). The teacher's epistemological belief and instructional design practice. Journal of Educational Technology 25(3), 1-33.
  11. Kang, Young-Sim.Kang, Mi-A.Jung, Eun-Young(2006). Exploration of the component factors on images of good elementary teacher based on implicit theories. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education 18(3), 283-292.
  12. Kim, Hang-Eun(2014). Teachers' characteristics that influence students positively. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education 26(3), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.3.611
  13. Kim, Hee-Bae(2000). The sociological understanding of educational technology-critical paradigm of schooling. Journal of Educational Technology 16(4), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.16.4.77
  14. Kim, Jee-Hyeon(2013). The conditions of educative metaphor and Jesus's utterance case study. The Journal of Educational Principles 18(2), 83-125.
  15. Kim, Jung-Sub.Park, Su-Hong(2002). Abductive reasoning as logic for knowledge creation and its implications for instructional design. Journal of Educational Technology 18(4), 139-165. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.18.4.139
  16. Kim, Young-Chun(2010). The Qualitative Research (3rd). Seoul, CA: Academy Press.
  17. Knowles, M. & Moom, R.(2006). Introducing Metaphor. (Kim, Ju-Shik.Kim, Dong-Hwan Translation. Eunwoo. Seoul: Korean Culture Press.)
  18. Kozma, R. B.(1994). Will Media Influence Learning? Reframing the Debate. ETR & D 42(2), 7-20.
  19. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.(1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  20. Leem, Jung-Hoon(2015). Research Trends on Application of Educational Technology in School Settings: 1985-2014. Journal of Educational Technology 31(2), 311-339. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.2.311
  21. Lim, Cheol-Il.Leem, Jung-Hoon.Lee, Dong-Ju(2011). Educational Technology. Seoul: KNOU Press.
  22. Lim, Hyun-Jin.Yoo, Ye-Som.Chung, Jae-Sam(2014). The comparison analysis of domestic research trends of educational technology in last decade. Journal of Educational Information and Media 20(2), 137-159.
  23. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  24. Lubart, T. I. & Getz, I.(1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal 4(10), 285-301.
  25. Mahlios, M. & Maxson, M.(1998). Metaphors as structures for elementary and secondary preservice teachers' thinking. Journal of Educational Research 29(1), 227-240.
  26. Marshall, M. N.(1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13(6), 522-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
  27. Nonaka, K. & Takeuchi, H.(1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. Park, So-Young.Kim, Dae-Hyun(2015). Teachers' happy school life: Their story. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education 27(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2015.27.1.145
  29. Park, Young-Soon.Kang, E-Cheol(2011). Creative metaphor generation process: Application to instructional design. Journal of Educational Technology 27(4), 755-780. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.27.4.755
  30. Reigeluth, C. M.(Ed.)(1999). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Inc.
  31. Reiser, R. A.(2012). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (2012). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3rd Edition. Pearson Education Inc.
  32. Reiser, R. A. & Gagne, R. M.(1983). Selecting Media for Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  33. Rha, Il-Joo(1995). Directions for future research on instructional media. Journal of Educational Technology 11(1), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.11.1.47
  34. Rha, Il-Joo(2007). The Theory of Educational Technology. Seoul: Educational Science Press.
  35. Romiszowski, A. J.(1981). Designing Instructional Systems. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
  36. Ryoo, Wan-Young(2014). The meaning of meaning in the constructivism. Journal of Educational Technology 30(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.30.1.1
  37. Ryu, Su-Min.Lee, Ha-Jeing.Han, An-Na(2015). Early childhood education teachers' metaphors on early childhood special education, The Journal of Child Education 24(2), 169-188.
  38. Schank, R.(1994). Inside Case-based Explanation. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  39. Seels, B. B. & Richey, R. C.(1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field, Washington DC: Associations for Educational Communications and Technology.
  40. West, C. K..Farner, J. A. & Wolff, P. M.(1991). Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  41. Wilkinson, D. & Birmingham, P.(2003). Using Research Instruments: A Guide for Researchers. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  42. Yang, Young-Sun(1995). Semiotics as alternative research paradigm for educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology 11(2), 1-10.
  43. You, Young-Man(2002). Qualitative research methodology in the field of educational technology: Expanding the epistemological horizons by exploring methodological alternatives. Journal of Educational Technology 8(2), 135-172.

피인용 문헌

  1. Development of the Team-based Project Learning Program to Solve the Authentic Problems vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.06.30.3.1103