한국지역지리학회지 (Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers)

  • 제22권4호
  • /
  • Pages.912-930
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-7392(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-1468(eISSN)
한국지역지리학회 (The Korean Association of Regional Geographers)
권호 표지

사회적 자연의 지리환경교육적 함의

Social Nature and Its Implications for Geography and Environment Education

  • 조철기 (경북대학교 사범대학 지리교육과)
  • Cho, Chul-Ki (Department of Geography Education, Teachers College, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.01
  • 심사 : 2016.11.25
  • 발행 : 2016.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 지리환경교육에서 있어서 전통적인 인간(또는 사회)과 자연의 이분법을 타파하기 위한 방법으로 최근 지리학을 비롯한 사회과학에서 논의되고 있는 자연의 사회적 구성, 즉 사회적 자연 개념의 수용을 주장한다. 이를 위해 영국과 오스트레일리아 그리고 우리나라 지리 교육과정 및 교과서 분석을 통해 인간과 자연과의 관계, 환경의 의미, 사회적 자연 개념의 수용 정도를 파악하였다. 최근 학문과 교육의 키워드가 통합 및 융합에 초점을 두고 있다는 점에서, 사회적 자연은 지리환경교육에도 꽤 설득력을 지닐 수 있다. 실제로 자본주의가 고도화되면서 자연은 인간의 정치, 경제, 사회, 문화적 실천에 의해 사회적으로 구성되고 있다. 따라서 지리교육은 자연과 인문이라는 영역의 간극 을 좁히면서, 단순한 인간과 자연과의 관계 탐색을 넘어 자연이 어떻게 사회적으로 구성되는지를 탐색하는데 초점을 맞출 필요가 있다. 이러한 사회적 자연이 지리환경교육적 측면에 가지는 또 하나의 의의는 학생들에게 인간과 자연, 인간과 장소의 관계에 대한 관계적 감수성을 길러 줄 수 있다.

This paper suggests to bring the idea of social construction of nature or social nature discussed in social science including geography to geographical and environmental education for breaking traditional divide of people(or society) and nature. And this paper analyzed relationship between people and nature, meaning of environment and the concepts of social nature represented in the geography curriculum and textbook of England, Australia and Korea. Recently in terms of focusing disciplines or education on integration or convergence, introduction of social nature in teaching and learning geography and environment has an important implication. With rapid growth of capitalism, nature is constructed socially by the political, economical, social and cultural practice. Thus geography education reduces the distance between human geography and physical geography and needs to focus on exploring not just the relationship between people and nature but social construction of nature. Another implication of the introduction of social nature in teaching and learning geography and environment is that students can develop the relational sensitivity about the relationship people and nature or people and place.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육과학기술부, 2009, 사회과 교육과정, 교육과학기술부.
  2. 교육과학기술부, 2011, 사회과 교육과정, 교육과학기술부.
  3. 김숙진, 2010, 행위자-연결망 이론을 통한 과학과 자연의 재해석, 대한지리학회지, 45(4), 461-477.
  4. 엄은희, 2009, 제3세계 환경문제에 대한 환경정의 적 접근과 지리교육의 과제, 한국지리환경교육학회지, 17(1), 59-71.
  5. 전종환.서민철.장의선.박승규, 2008, 인문지리학의 시선, 논형.
  6. 황진태, 2016, 지리교육에서 사회적 자연(social nature) 개념 활용의 시사점, 2016년 하계 학술대회 발표자료집, 88-89.
  7. 황진태.박배균, 2013, 한국의 국가와 자연의 관계에 대한 정치생태학적 연구를 위한 시론, 대한지리학회지, 48(3), 348-365.
  8. ACARA, 2012, The Shape of the Australian Curriculum(version 4.0), ACARA, Sydney.
  9. ACARA, 2013a, Curriculum Design Paper(version 3.1), ACARA, Sydney.
  10. ACARA, 2013b, The Australian Curriculum Geography(version 5.2), ACARA, Sydney.
  11. Ageyman, J., Bullard, R.D. and Evans, B., 2003, Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World, Earthscan.
  12. Anderson, J., 2009, Understanding Cultural Geography: Places and Traces, Routledge(이영민.이종희 옮김, 2010, 문화.장소.흔적: 문화지리로 세상 읽기, 한울).
  13. Castree, N. and Braun, B. (eds.), 2001, Social nature: theory, practice and politics, Blackwell, Oxford and New York.
  14. Castree, N. and MacMillian, T., 2001, Dissolving dualisms: actor-networks and the reimagination of nature, in Castree, N. and Braun, B. (eds.), Social Nature, Blackwell, Oxford and New York, 208-224.
  15. Castree, N., 1995, The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism, Antipode, 27(1), 12-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00260.x
  16. Castree, N., 2005, Nature, Routledge, Oxford.
  17. Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D. and Rhoads, B. (eds.), 2009, A companion to environmental geography, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  18. Castree, N., Fuller, D. and Lambert, D., 2007, Boundary crossing: Geography without borders, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 129-132.
  19. Coe, N., Kelly, P. and Yeung, H.W., 2007, Economic Geography: A Contemporary Introduction, Wiley-Blackwell(안영진.이종호.이원호.남기범 옮김, 2011, 현대 경제지리학 강의, 푸른길).
  20. Cronon, W. (ed.), 1995, Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature, Norton, New York.
  21. Demeritt, D., 2002, What is the 'social construction of nature'? A typology and sympathetic critique, Progress in Human Geography, 26(2), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph402oa
  22. Firth, R., 2011, The Nature of ESD through geography: some thoughts and questions, Teaching Geography, Spring, 14-16.
  23. GA, 2014, Geographical Association Annual Conference and Exhibition Pamphlet, 2.
  24. Ginn, F. and Demeritt, D., 2009, Nature: A Contested Concept, in Clifford, N., Holloway, S., Rice, S. and Valentine, G., (eds.), Key concepts in geography, Sage, London, 300-311.
  25. Graves, N., 1984, Geography in Education, 3rd, Heinemann Educational Books, London.
  26. Harvey, D., 1974, What kind of geography for what kind of public policy?, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, 18-24.
  27. Haubrich, H., 2009, Global leadership and global responsibility for geographical education, International Research in Geographical and Environment Education, 18(2), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040902861114
  28. Hawley, D., 2013, What is the rightful place of physical geography, in Lambert, D. and Jones, M. (eds.), Debates in geography education, Routledge, London, 89-102.
  29. Henderson, G. and Waterstone, M. (eds.), 2009, Geographic thought: a praxis perspective, Routlege, London.
  30. Hewitt, K. (ed.), 1983, Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology, Allen & Unwin, Boston.
  31. Huckle, J., 2002, Reconstructing Nature: Towards a Geographical Education for Sustainable Development, Geography, 87(1), 64-72.
  32. Huckle, J., 2009, Sustainable schools: responding to new challenges and opportunities, Geography, 94(1), 13-21.
  33. Lambert, D. and Morgan, J., 2010, Environment, sustainability and futures, in Lambert, D. and Morgan, Teaching geography 11-18: A conceptual approach, McGrawhill, New York, 133-144.
  34. Matthews, J.A and Herbert, D.T., 2004, Unity in geography: Prospects for the discipline, in Matthews, J.A and Herbert, D.T. (eds.), Unifying geography: Common heritage, shared future, Routledge, Abingdon.
  35. Maude, A. M., 2014, Developing a national geography curriculum for Australia, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.858440
  36. McInerney, M., Berg, K., Hutchinson, N., Maude, A. and Sorensen, L., 2009, Towards a national geography curriculum for Australia, Towards a National Geography Curriculum for Australia Project, Milton, Queensland.
  37. Merchant, C., 1979, The Death of Nature, Harper and Row, San Francisco.
  38. Morgan, J., 2012, Geography, society, naturechanging perspectives, in Morgan, J., Teaching Secondary Geography as if the Planet Matters, Routledge, London and New York, 43-58.
  39. Naish, M., Rawling, E. and Hart, C., 1987, Geography 16-19, The Contribution of a Curriculum Project to 16-19 Education, Longman, Harlow.
  40. Newson, M., 1992, 20 years of systematic physical geography: issues for a new environmental age, Progress in Physical Geography, 16(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339201600203
  41. O'Riordan, T., 1976, Environmentalism, Pion, London.
  42. Pepper, D., 1985, Why teach physical geography, Contemporary Issues in Geography and Education, 2(1), 62-71.
  43. Robbins, P., 2004, Political ecology: a critical introduction, Wiley, Chichester(권상철 옮김, 2008, 정치생태학, 한울).
  44. Seager, J., 1993, Earth follies: coming to feminist terms with the global environmental crisis, Routledge, New York.
  45. Smith, N., 1984, Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space, University of Georgia Press, Athens.
  46. Smith, N., 1996, The production of nature, in Robertson, G., Mash, M., and Tickneretal, L. (eds.), Futurenatural, Routledge, London and New York, 35-54.
  47. Swyngedouw, E., 1999, Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00157
  48. Tadaki, M., Salmond, J., Le Heron, R. and Brierley, G., 2012, Nature, culture, and the work of physical geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(12), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00488.x
  49. Watts, M., 2005, Nature: Culture, in Cloke, P. and Johnston, R., Spaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography's Binaries, Sage Publications, London, 142-174.
  50. Whatmore, S., 2002, Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces, Sage Publications, London.
  51. White, R., 1995, Are you an environment or do you work for a living? Work and nature, in Cronon, W. (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature, Norton, London and New York, 171-185.