DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional Differences in Onion Bulb Quality and Nutrient Content, and the Correlation Between Bulb Characteristics and Storage Loss

  • Lee, Jongtae (Onion Research Institute Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Ha, Injong (Onion Research Institute Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kim, Heedae (Onion Research Institute Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Choi, Silim (Onion Research Institute Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Lee, Sangdae (Onion Research Institute Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kang, jumsoon (Department of Horticultural Bioscience, Pusan National University) ;
  • Boyhan, George E. (Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia)
  • Received : 2016.02.24
  • Accepted : 2016.07.13
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

Many onion growers and researchers assert that differences in soil type, agricultural practices, weather, and duration of prolonged onion cultivation in a particular field could affect onion bulb quality. This study evaluates the bulb quality of onions grown in different regions and determines the correlations between bulb characteristics and postharvest loss during cold and ambient storage. Soil and onion bulbs were collected from fields in six onion growing regions in Korea, during the growing season of 2011-2012. The fresh weight, dry matter content, and carbon (C), sulfur and magnesium contents of the onion bulbs were significantly affected by the location in which they were grown. Bulbs grown in Muan had the greatest number of scales, thinnest scale thickness, and the highest total soluble solids (TSS) and total flavonoids (TF). Bulbs originating from Jecheon had the lowest pyruvic acid (PA), total phenolics and TF. Storage loss of bulbs from the different regions was similar in refrigerated storage, but differed in ambient temperature storage. Bulb fresh weight was positively correlated with scale thickness (r = 0.617) and cold storage loss (CSL; r = 0.398). Dry matter content was positively correlated with C (r = 0.958) and TF (r = 0.256) contents, while it was negatively correlated with CSL (r = -0.424). CSL was primarily affected by the fresh weight, as well as the dry matter, C, and PA contents of the bulbs, while ambient storage loss was primarily influenced by the amount of TSS.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamicki F (2005) Effects of pre-harvest treatments and storage conditions on quality and shelf-life of onions. Acta hort 688:229-238. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.688.31
  2. Bedford LV (1984) Dry matter and pungency tests on British grown onions. J. Nat Inst Agric Bot 16:581-591
  3. Bottcher H (1999) Influence of harvest date on the postharvest responses of Allium-Vegetable species. Gartenbauwissenschaft 7:59-70
  4. Boyhan GE, Torrance RL, Cook J, Riner C, Hill CR (2009) Sowing date, transplanting date, and variety effect on transplanted short-day onion production. HortTechnology 19: 66-71
  5. Brewser JL (1997) Environmental physiology of the onion: Towards quantitative models for the effects of photoperiod, temperature and irradiance on bulbing, flowering and growth. Acta Hort 433:347-373. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.433.37
  6. Caruso G, Conti S, Villari G, Borrelli C, Melchionna G, Minutolo M, Russo G, Amalfitano C (2014) Effects of transplanting time and plant density on yield, quality and antioxidant content of onion (Allium cepa L.) in southern Italy. Scientia Horticulturae 166:111-120. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.12.019
  7. Coolong TW, Randle WM (2003) Temperature influences falvor intensity and quality in 'Granex 33' onion. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 128:176-181
  8. Currah L, Proctor FJ (1990) Onions in tropical regions. Bulletin No. 35. National Research Institute, Kent, UK.
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2012) FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/ Accessed 7 February 2016
  10. Fleming RA, Adams RM, Ervin DE (1998) The role of soil test information in reducing groundwater pollution. J Agric Re. Econom 23:20-38
  11. Galdon BR, Gonzalez RO, Rodriguez ER, Romero CD (2008) Comparison of mineral and trace element contents in onion cultivars (Allium cepa L.). J Sci Food Agric 88:1554-1561. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3250
  12. Galmarini CR, Goldman IL, Havey MJ (2001) Genetic analyses of correlated solids, flavor, and health-enhancing traits in onion (Allium cepa L.). Mol Genet Genomics 265:543-551. doi:10.1007/s004380100445
  13. Gericke S, Kurmies B (1952) The colorimetric phosphorus analysis with ammonium-vandate-Molybdate and its application in plant analysis. Plant Fert Soil 59:235-247
  14. Hamilton BK, Pike LM, Yoo KS (1997) Clonal variations of pungency, sugar content, and bulb weight of onions due to sulphur nutrition. Scientia Horticulturae 71:131-136. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00033-2
  15. Henriksen K, Hansen SL (2001) Increasing he dry matter production in bulb onions (Allium cepa L.). Acta Hort 555:147-152. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.555.20
  16. Hornick SB (1992) Factors affecting the nutritional quality of crops. Am J Altern Agric 7:63-68. doi:10.1017/S0889189300004471
  17. Hutton RC, Wilson GJ (1986) Onion: effect of sowing date on maturity, yield, and quality of 'Pukekohe Longkeeper' and 'Early Longkeeper'. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 14453-457 https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1986.10423065
  18. Kumar S, Imtiyaz M, Kumar A (2006) Effect of differential soil moisture and nutrient regimes on postharvest attributes of onion (Allium cepa L.). Scientia Horticulturae 112:121-129. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.024
  19. Kwon JH, Lee GD, Byun MW (1999) Quality changes based on storage temperature and humidity. Kor J Postharvest Sci Technol 6:143-147
  20. Lee J, Song J, Lee S (2012) Excessive fertilization is detrimental to yield and quality for onion grown on high organic matter content paddy soils, International Journal of Vegetable Science 18:235-244. doi:10.1080/19315260.2011.623147
  21. Lee J, Hwang S, Ha I, Min B, Hwang H, Lee S (2015) Comparison of Bulb and Leaf Quality, and Antioxidant Compounds of Intermediate-day Onion from Organic and Conventional Systems. Hortic Evnviron Biotechnol 56:427-436. doi:10.1007/s13580-015-1036-7
  22. Lee JT, Kim HD, Lee SD, Ro CH (2012) Variability and interrelationship among yield and bulb quality contributing characters in intermediate-day onion. Acta Hort 969:123-131. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.969.15
  23. Lee EJ, Suh JK (2009) Effect of temperature on the growth, pyruvic acid and sugar contents in onion bulbs. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 27:554-559
  24. Mallor C, Balcells M, Mallor F, Sales E (2011) Genetic variation for bulb size, soluble solids content and pungency in the Spanish sweet onion variety Fuentes de Ebro. Response to selection for low pungency. Plant Breeding 130:55-59. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01737.x
  25. McIntosh JL (1969) Bray and Morgan soil extractants modified for testing acid soils from different parent materials. Agron J 61:259-265. doi:10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100020025x
  26. Mogren LM, Olsson ME, Gertsson UE (2006) Quercetin content in field-cured onions (Allium cepa L.): Effects of cultivar, lifting time, and nitrogen fertilizer level. J Agric Food Chem 54:6185-6191. doi:10.1021/jf060980s
  27. Patil BS, Pike LM, Hamilton BK (1995) Changes in quercetin concentration in onion (Allium cepa L.) owing to location, growth stage and soil type. New Phytol 130:349-355. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb01829.x
  28. Platinius H (1944) Factors affecting onion pungency. J. Agric. Res. 62:371
  29. Randle WM (1997) Genetic and environmental effects influencing flavor in onion. Acta Horticulture 433:299-311. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.433.31
  30. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2006) The standard of fertilizer application on crop species. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea
  31. Slavin W (1968) Atomic absorption spectroscopy. Chem Anal 25:87-90
  32. Singleton VL, Rossi Jr JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungtic acid reagent. Am J Enol Vitic 16:144-158
  33. Smittle DA, Maw BW (1988) Effects of maturity and harvest methods on storage and quality of onions. HortScience 23:141-143
  34. Statistics Korea (KOSTAT) (2014) Production of barley, garlic and onions in 2015. No 1631. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/english/news/1/1/index.board Accessed 7 February 2016
  35. Williams CA, Grayer RJ (2004) Anthocyanins and other flavonoids. Nat Prod Rep 21:539-573. doi:10.1039/b311404j
  36. Wright PJ (1993) The effect of nitrogen fertiliser, plant maturity at lifting, and water during field curing on the incidence of bacterial soft rot of onions in store. NZ J Crop Hortic Sci 21:377-381. doi:10.1080/01140671.1993.9513762
  37. Wright RC, Lauritzen JI, Whiteman TM (1935) Influence of storage temperature and humidity on keeping qualities of onions and onion sets. Technical Bulletin No. 475. U.S. Dept of Agric
  38. Yoo KS, Pike LM, Hamilton BK (1995) A simplified pyruvic acid analysis suitable for onion breeding program. HortScience 30:1306
  39. Yoo KS, Pike L, Crosby K, Jones R, Leskovar D (2006) Differences in onion pungency due to cultivars, growth environment, and bulb sizes. Scientia Horticulturae 110:144-149. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.006
  40. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W (1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64:555-559. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2

Cited by

  1. Improving the Commercial Value of the ‘Calçot’ ( Allium cepa L.) Landrace: Influence of Genetic and Environmental Factors in Chemical Composition and Sensory Attributes vol.9, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01465
  2. Comparison of the antioxidant properties and flavonols in various parts of Korean red onions by multivariate data analysis vol.59, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0091-2