한국연소학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Combustion)

  • 제21권4호
  • /
  • Pages.30-38
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-0959(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-2089(eISSN)
한국연소학회 (The Korean Society of Combustion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미분탄 스월버너에서 PKS와 석탄 혼소가 화염 구조에 미치는 영향

Effect of Co-firing PKS and Coal on Flame Structure in a Pulverized Coal Swirl Burner

  • 신민호 (부산대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 성연모 (부산대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 최민성 (부산대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 이광수 (한국남부발전 부산발전본부) ;
  • 최경민 (부산대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 김덕줄 (부산대학교 기계공학부)
  • Shin, Minho (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Sung, Yonmo (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Minsung (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Gwangsu (Business Development Department, Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd., KOSPO) ;
  • Choi, Gyungmin (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Duckjool (School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.24
  • 심사 : 2016.10.30
  • 발행 : 2016.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Flame structure of co-firing coal and palm kernel shell (PKS) was investigated in a pulverized coal swirl burner by particle image velocimetry (PIV). The pulverized coal swirl flame is operated with a PKS blending ratio of 10%, 20%, and 30%. For all operating conditions, flame structures such as internal recirculation zone (IRZ), outer recirculation zone (ORZ), and exhaust tube vortex (ETV) were observed. In the center of flame, the strong velocity gradient is occurred at the stagnation point where the volatile gas combustion actively takes place and the acceleration is increased with higher PKS blending ratio. OH radical shows the burned gas region at the stagnation point and shear layer between IRZ and ORZ. In addition, OH radical intensity increases for a co-firing condition because of high volatile matter from PKS. Because the volatile gas combustion takes place at lower temperature, co-firing condition (more than 20%) leads to oxygen deficiency and reduces the combustibility of coal particle near the burner. Therefore, increasing PKS blending ratio leads to higher OH radical intensity and lower temperature.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. Demirbas, Combustion Characteristics of Different Biomass Fuels, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 30 (2004) 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004
  2. L. Baxter, Biomass-Coal Co-Combustion: Opportunity for Affordable Renewable Energy, Fuel, 84 (2005) 1295-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.023
  3. T. Nussbaumer, Combustion and Co-Combustion of Biomass: Fundamentals, Technologies, and Primary Measures for Emission Reduction, Energy Fuels, 17 (2003) 1510-1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef030031q
  4. G.J. Hesselmann, Optimization of Combustion by Fuel Testing in a NOx Reduction Test Facility, Fuel, 76 (1997) 1269-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00033-1
  5. S. Munir, W. Nimmo, B.M. Gibbs, The Effect of Air Staged, Co-Combustion of Pulverised Coal and Biomass Blends on NOx Emissions and Combustion Efficiency, Fuel, 90 (2011) 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.052
  6. D.E. Priyanto, S. Ueno, N. Sato, H. Kasai, T. Tanoue, H. Fukushima, Ash Transformation by Co-Firing of Coal with High Ratios of Woody Biomass and Effect on Slagging Propensity, Fuel, 174 (2016) 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.072
  7. J. Chacon, J.M. Sala, J.M. Blanco, Investigation on the Design and Optimization of a Low NOx-CO Emission Burner Both Experimentally and through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations, Energy Fuels, 21 (2007) 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0602473
  8. Z. Chen, Z. Li, Q. Zhu, J. Jing, Gas/Particle Flow and Combustion Characteristics and NOx Emissions of a New Swirl Coal Burner, Energy, 36 (2011) 709-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.037
  9. R. Luo, Y. Zhang, N. Li, Q. Zhou, P. Sun, Experimental Study on Flow and Combustion Characteristic of a Novel Swirling Burner Based on Dual Register Structure for Pulverized Coal Combustion, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 54 (2014) 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.01.021
  10. M. Gu, M. Zhang, W. Fan, L. Wang, F. Tian, The Effect of the Mixing Characters of Primary and Secondary Air on NOx Formation in a Swirling Pulverized Coal Flame, Fuel, 84 (2005) 2093-2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.019
  11. J.O.L. Wendt, Fundamental Coal Combustion Mechanisms and Pollutant Formation in Furnaces, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 6 (1980) 210-222.
  12. S. Fan, Z. Li, X. Yang, G. Liu, Z. Chen, Influence of Outer Secondary-Air Vane Angle on Combustion Characteristics and NOx Emissions of a Down-Fired Pulverized-Coal 300 MWe Utility Boiler, Fuel, 89 (2010) 1525-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.014
  13. S. Ti, Z. Che, Z. Li, Y. Xie, Y. Shao, Q. Zong, Q. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Zeng, Q. Zhu, Influence of Different Swirl Vane Angles of Over Fire Air on Flow and Combustion Characteristics and NOx Emissions in a 600 MWe Utility Boiler, Energy, 74 (2014) 775-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.049
  14. S. Balusamy, M.M. Kamal, S.M. Lowe, B. Tian, Y. Gao, S. Hochgreb, Laser Diagnostics of Pulverized Coal Combustion in $O_2/N_2$ and $O_2/CO_2$ Conditions: Velocity and Scalar Field Measurements, Exp. Fluids, 56 (2015) 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1965-z
  15. M. Stohr, I. Boxx, C.D. Carter, W. Meier, Experimental Study of Vortex-Flame Interaction in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor, Combust. Flame, 159 (2012) 2636-2649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.03.020
  16. G. Bulat, W.P. Jones, S. Navarro-Martinez, Large Eddy Simulations of Isothermal Confined Swirling Flow in an Industrial Gas-Turbine, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 51 (2015) 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.10.028
  17. Y. Sung, S. Lee, S. Eom, C. Moon, S. Ahn, G. Choi, D. Kim, Optical Non-Intrusive Measurements of Internal Recirculation Zone of Pulverized Coal Swirling Flames with Secondary Swirl Intensity, Energy, 103 (2016) 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.095
  18. Y. Sung, G. Choi, Non-Intrusive Optical Diagnostics of Co- and Counter-Swirling Flames in a Dual Swirl Pulverized Coal Combustion Burner, Fuel, 174 (2016) 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.011
  19. F. Akamatsu, T. Wakabayashi, S. Tsushima, M. Katsuki, Y. Mizutani, Y. Ikeda, N. Kawahara, T. Nakajima, The Development of a Light-Collecting Probe with High Spatial Resolution Applicable to Randomly Fluctuating Combustion Fields, Meas. Sci. Technol., 10 (1999) 1240-1246. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/10/12/316
  20. J.R. Kim, F. Akamatsu, G.M. Choi, D.J. Kim, Observation of Local Heat Release Rate with Changing Combustor Pressure in the $CH_4$/Air Flame (Wrinkled Laminar Regime), Thermochim. Acta, 491 (2009) 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2009.03.012
  21. C. Yin, L. Rosendahl, S.K. Kaer, Towards a Better Understanding of Biomass Suspension Co-Firing Impacts Via Investigating a Coal Flame and a Biomass Flame in a Swirl-Stabilized Burner Flow Reactor Under Same Conditions, Fuel Process. Technol., 98 (2012) 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.024
  22. S. Hwang, R. Kurose, F. Akamatsu, H. Tsuji, H. Makino, M. Katsuki, Application of Optical Diagnostics Techniques to a Laboratory-Scale Turbulent Pulverized Coal Flame, Energy Fuels, 19 (2005) 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049867z
  23. Y. Sung, M. Choi, S. Lee, G. Lee, M. Shin, G. Choi, D. Kim, Generation Mechanism of Tube Vortex in Methane-Assisted Pulverized Coal Swirling Flames, Fuel Process. Technol., (2016) in press.
  24. D. Kim, S. Choi, Experimental Investigation of Burning Pulverized Coal Particles: Emission Analysis and Observation of Particle Sample, J. Korean Soc. Combust, 15 (2010) 19-26.
  25. J.W. An, S.Y. Ahn, C.E. Moon, Y.M. Sung, S.I. Seo, T.H. Kim, G.M. Choi, D.J. Kim, A Study on Characteristics of Combustion and Thermo Pyrolysis in Co-firing with Pulverized Coal and Wood Biomass, J. Korean Soc. Combust, 15 (2010) 34-40.
  26. M.A. Serio, D.G. Hamblen, J.R. Markham, P.R. Solomon, Kinetics of Volatile Product Evolution in Coal Pyrolysis: Experiment and Theory, Energy Fuels, 1 (1987) 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00002a002