DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 성격유형별 강점과 약점에 관한 분석 -에니어그램 3·6·9 유형을 중심으로-

The Analysis of the Strength and the Weakness for College Students by Personality -Focusing on Enneagram Type 3·6·9-

  • 이송이 (동국대학교 다르마칼리지) ;
  • 심태은 (동국대학교 학생처 역량개발센터)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.21
  • 심사 : 2016.10.07
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31

초록

본 연구의 목적은 대학생이 인식하는 에니어그램 중심에너지의 중심유형인 3, 6, 9번 유형의 성격적 강점과 약점을 분석하여 자기 자신을 이해하기 위한 의미 있는 자료를 제공하기 위함이다. 본 연구의 목적을 위하여 NodeXL을 활용한 주제별 분석법(Thematic Analysis)을 활용하여 사례분석을 실시하였다. 강점의 경우 3번 유형에서는 목표지향적, 자신감, 6번 유형에서는 책임감, 계획적, 9번 유형에서는 평화주의, 배려의 특성이 가장 많이 나왔다. 약점의 경우 3번 유형에서는 주변 시선의식, 결과중시, 6번 유형에서는 걱정 많은, 우유부단, 9번 유형에서는 게으름, 갈등회피의 특성이 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 사례를 분석한 결과 3번 유형은 삶의 목표를 중시하며 다른 사람에게 인정받는 것에 큰 의미를 두는 것으로 보였고, 6유형은 책임감이 강하고 미리 준비하는 특성을 보였으며, 9유형은 관계 속에서 배려하고 갈등을 일으키지 않는 특성을 보였다. 각 특성에 대한 사례분석 결과는 대학생이 삶 속에서 보여주는 실질적인 내용에 근거하여 자신에 대한 이해를 폭을 넓힐 수 있도록 한 것에 그 의의가 있다.

This study analyzed the strengths and weaknesses for enneagram types 3, 6 and 9, which are the center types among the different centers of intelligence, in order to provide college students with meaningful knowledge that can improve their self-understanding. To conduct this study, thematic analysis was used to discover the strength and weakness keywords using NodeXL and contents analysis was used for the case analysis of types 3, 6, and 9. The results showed that the strengths were objectiveness and confidence for type 3, responsibility and premeditation for type 6 and pacifism and consideration for type 9. The weaknesses were self-consciousness and consequentialism for type 3, indecision and worry for type 6, and evading conflict and laziness for type 9. The results obtained by contents analysis showed that type 3 was goal-oriented and placed value on gaining the recognition of other people, type 6 had a sense of responsibility and was well prepared beforehand, and type 9 was considerate of others's feelings and evaded conflicts. This can help college students to better understand themselves.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ok Kyung Baek, Analysis on structural relationship of Character strengths, Self-determination and Life satisfaction among University students, Sangmyung University, 2014.
  2. Susan Rhodes, Integral Enneagram : a dharma-based approach for linking the nine personality types, nine stages of transformation & ken Wilber's integral operation system, seoul hagisa, 2016.
  3. Bong Hee Son, A Study on the Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of RHEIT. Korean Society of Nursing Science, Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 2003.
  4. Seok Jin Joo, A Study on Developing a Barometer to Discriminate Types of Enneagram, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Daegu University, Kyungbuk, 2003.
  5. Song Yi Lee, A Study on the Development and Validation of a Mothers' Child-rearing Attitude Scale based on the Enneagram Personality Types, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 2007.
  6. Hee Jung Chung, A Study on the Development and Validation of the Observation Inventory of the Preschool Children Enneagram Personality, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 2008.
  7. Eung Ja Kim, A Study on the Development and Validation of the Inventory of the Youth Enneagram Personality, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 2008.
  8. Su Yong Jeon, Development and validation of the clothing consumption attitude type indicator : Enneagram Personality Typology approach, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul, 2013.
  9. Seo Yeon Yun, A Study on the Development and Calidation of a Fathers's Parenting Behavior Scale Based on the Enneagram Personality Types. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 2016.
  10. Mira Lee & Hyensook Jeon, Personal types, Ego-resilience, and College Adaptation in Nyrsing and Health Care related Students, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation, 16, 12, pp. 8861-8869, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.12.8861
  11. Byoung-Mu Cho & Hae Sool Yang, Studies on Papo forming in good sales field for Customer Service Improvement : focused on enneragram, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation, 8, 6, pp. 1613-1624, 2007.
  12. Callon M. law J & Rip A, Mapping of the Dynamics of Science and Technology, London Macmilian, 1986.
  13. He, Q. Knowledge discovery though co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48, 1, pp. 133-159. 1999.
  14. Heo, G. E. & Song, M. Examining the intellectual structure of a medical informatics. Korean Journal of Information Management, 30, 2, pp. 208-225. 2013.
  15. Ju Young Kim, Se Gon Kim, A Study on Parenting Strength by the Enneagram Personality Type of Preschoolers'Mothers, Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 19, 3, pp. 573-598, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13049/kfwa.2014.19.3.573
  16. JiHae Han, Understanding of the Ennagram of Personality. Education Theory of practice, 21, pp. 23-41, 2011.
  17. Ju Ae ko, So Hee, An Alalysis of the Supervision Syyles of Supervisors in Social Welfare Centers according ti the Enneagram Personality Types, Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 18, 4, pp. 539-556, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13049/kfwa.2013.18.4.539
  18. Lee, S. H.. Vision enneagram program: Basic & Plus Manual., Vision Enneagram Education Institute. 2013.
  19. Young Ja Ha, Young Soon Lee, Seong Moon Cheon, Centering around Analysis on Lay Women;s Experiences of their Spiritual Selves, The Korea Journal of Counseling, 6, 3, pp. 1071-1085, 2005.
  20. Yera Hur, Keurn Ho Lee, Analysis of Medical Students; Enneagram Personality Types, Stress, and Developmental Level, Department of Medical Education, 23, 3, pp. 175-184, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.3.175