DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Flipped Learning Education in Physical Examination and Practicum

플립러닝을 활용한 건강사정 및 실습 교육 효과

  • Received : 2016.11.09
  • Accepted : 2016.12.08
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of an education method applying the flipped learning technique for college students. Both self-directed learning readiness and educational performance before and after applying the flipped learning were examined. After applying the flipped learning technique, teacher-student interaction, learning satisfaction, and learning motivation were identified. The correlation of each variable was examined after applying the flipped learning technique to investigate its influence on learning motivation. A total of 68 second-year nursing students enrolled in E University were analyzed. A difference between before and after applying the flipped learning was analyzed by the paired t-test; a correlation between the variables was analyzed via Pearson's correlation coefficient; and an influence on the dependent variable learning motivation was analyzed using the stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results showed that self-directed learning readiness increased before and after applying the flipped learning technique with statistical significance, and the difference of educational performance was not significant. After an education session applying the flipped learning technique, a learning motivation demonstrated a significantly positive correlation with self-directed learning readiness (r=0.33, p=.006), college student educational performance (r=0.51, p<.001), teacher-student interaction (r=0.72, p<.001), and learning satisfaction (r=0.79, p<.001). A significantly positive correlation was also observed between the other variables. Factors influencing learning motivation were learning satisfaction and teacher-student interaction. The explanatory power for learning motivation in the regression model considering these two variables was 71.3% (F=80.66, p<.001). Therefore, to enhance learning motivation in applying the flipped learning technique, it is necessary to increase learning satisfaction and to establish a strategy that further vitalizes the teacher-student interaction.

본 연구의 목적은 대학생을 대상으로 플립러닝을 적용한 교육방법의 효과를 알아보고자 하는 것이다. 플립러닝을 적용하기 전과 후의 자기주도학습 준비도, 핵심역량을 파악하고, 플립러닝을 적용한 후 교수-학생 상호작용, 학습만족도, 학습동기를 파악하여, 플립러닝 적용 후 각 변수의 상관관계를 살펴보고, 학습동기에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 단일군 전후 비교 연구로 대상자는 경기도 S시 일개 간호대학에서 플립러닝을 활용하여 건강사정 및 실습을 수강하는 2학년 학생을 대상으로 하였다. 최종 분석은 68명을 대상으로 하였고, 사전 사후의 차이는 paired t-test로, 각 변수간 상관관계는 Pearson's correlation coefficient로 분석하였으며, 종속변수인 학습동기에 미치는 영향은 단계적 다중회귀방법을 사용하였다. 그 결과 자기주도학습 준비도는 사전 사후 통계적으로 유의하게 증가하였고, 핵심역량은 그 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 플립러닝교육 후 학습동기는 자기주도학습 준비도(r=0.33, p=.006), 대학생 핵심역량(r=0.51, p<.001), 교수-학생 상호작용(r=0.72, p<.001), 학습만족도(r=0.79, p<.001)와 유의한 정적 상관관계를 보였고, 모든 다른 변수들 간에도 정적으로 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 학습동기에 영향을 미치는 요인은 학습만족도와 교수-학생 상호작용이었으며, 이 2개 변수로 구축된 회귀모형의 학습동기에 대한 설명력은 71.3% (F=80.66, p<.001)였다. 따라서 플립러닝 교육을 적용하였을 때 학습동기를 증진시키기 위해서는 학습만족도를 증진시키고, 교수-학생 상호작용을 활발히 하는 전략의 마련이 필요하겠다.

Keywords

References

  1. B. Goodwin, K. Miller, "Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in", Educational Leadership, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 78-80, 2013.
  2. J. Bergmann, A. Sams. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. p.1-109, Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education, 2012.
  3. V, Betihavas, H. Bridgman, R. Kornhaber, M. Cross, "The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education", Nurse education today, vol. 38, pp. 15-21, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010
  4. H. Greenberger, H. Reches, S. Riba, "Do new graduates of registered nursing programs in Israel perceive themselves as technically competent?", The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 133-140, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-20050501-11
  5. D. Y. Lee, "Utilization of an Educational Information System for Medical Education", Korean Medical Education Review, vol. 16, no. 10. pp. 1-6, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2014.16.1.001
  6. D. Y. Bai, "A case study of the Flipped Learning classes at the university", The Journal of Urimal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 179-202, 2015.
  7. H. S. Lee, C. S. Kim, "Poster : The Effect of Flipped Learning on Learning Motivation", The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 143-147, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0143
  8. M. Kathy, R. Fountain, L. Summers, K. Gosselin, "Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction." Journal of Nursing Education, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-03
  9. M. J. Geist, D. Larimore, H. Rawiszer, AW. Al, "Flipped versus traditional instruction and achievement in a baccalaureate nursing pharmacology course", Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 114-115, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/13-1292.
  10. J. Y. Lee, S. H. Park, H. J. Kang, S. Y. Park, "An Exploratory Study on Educational Significance and Environment of Flipped Learning", Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 313-323, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.9.313
  11. C. M Critz, D. Knight, "Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education", Nurse educator, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 210-213, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e56a
  12. V. Simpson, E. Richards, "Flipping the classroom to teach population health: increasing the relevance", Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 162-167, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001
  13. H. J. Han, C. L. Lim, S. L. Han, J. W. Park, "Instructional Strategies for Integrating Online and Offline Modes of Flipped Learning in Higher Education", The Korean Society for Educational Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1-38. 2015.
  14. A. Butt, "Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia", Business Education & Accreditation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33-43, 2014.
  15. J. F. Strayer, "How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation", Learning Environments Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 171-193, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  16. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang, A. Buchner, "G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behavior research methods, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 175-191, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  17. H. J Park, Self-directed learning: The nevigation of my studies. Ministry of Education: Sejong, 2011, Available From: http://hatbit.kg.kr/user/saveDir/board/www24/76_1385021346_0.pdf(accessed Nov, 2016)
  18. L. M. Guglielmino, Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale, ProQuest Information & Learning, 1978.
  19. K. J. Kim, K. S. Kim, G. O. Yu, G. H. Yu, "The development and application plan of the self-directed learning readness scale for elementary school teachers", Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 1996.
  20. M. S. Jin, Y. M. Sohn, H. J. Chu, "A study on development plan of K-CESA for college education assessment", The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 461-486, 2011.
  21. M. H. Kang, H. O. Heo, L. H. Jo, J. H. Shin, J. H. Seo, "Developing an educational performance indicator for new millennium learners", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 157-170, 2010. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782567
  22. E. H. Kim. Readiness of University students in Korea for the Core Competencies in the 21st Century. p.1-75, Master' s thesis Ewha University, Seoul, 2014.
  23. M. G Moore, G. Kearsley, Distance education: A systems view. p.1-273, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1996.
  24. Fisher, G. Laura. Comparing writing with interviews and exams as assessments of students understanding of the consept of the derivative. The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2001.
  25. S. Y. Han. The Effect of Professor-Student Interaction on Physical Self-Efficacy and Dance Ability Achievement. p.1-59, Master's thesis, Dankook University, Jukjeon. 2009.
  26. K. H. Pak, Y. M. Kim, "A Study on Smart Phone based e-Learning and its Impact on Learner's Satisfaction", The e-Business Studies vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 25-45, 2013.
  27. J. J. Stein. Asynchronous computer conferencing as a supplement to classroom instruction in higher education: The impact of selected learner characteristics on user satisfaction and the amount of interaction, Ph.D thesis, Wayne State University, 1997.
  28. K. Y. Lim. Factors Related to the Learner Participation, Achievement, Satisfaction in the Web-based Online Discussion. p. 1-159, The Graduate School of Ewha Womans' University, seoul, 1999.
  29. J. Brophy. Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.), Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates, Inc., Publishers, 2004.
  30. J. M. Keller. The ARCS Model for Developing Motivationally-Adaptive Computer-Assisted Instruction. p. 513-530 Educational Resources Information Center, 1999.
  31. J. C. Jeon. The Effects on Learning Motivation & Self-Efficacy according to the type of Reflection, Graduate School of Konkuk University, seoul, 2012.
  32. CJ Brame. Flipping the classroom. Retrieved, 2013, Available From: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/(accessed Oct., 30, 2016)
  33. P. G. Baek, "A Study on the Relationships and Characteristics between Korean Collegiate Essential Skills and Undergraduates' Individual Variant Factors", Korean Journal of General Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 349-387, 2013.
  34. J. I. Lee, J. H. Kim, "A Study on the Relationship between College Students' Essential Skills and Academic Achievement", The Journal of Vocational Education Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 227-246, 2012.
  35. J. Visser, J. M. Keller, "The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design", Instructional Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 467-500, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00119391
  36. S. Roh, "Factors influencing the academic achievements of web-based distance Learners-the case of capital region's undergraduate distance learners", The Journal of Educational Information and Media, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 99-130, 2007.
  37. S. G. KIM, "effects of a Simulation-based High-risk neonatal Care Education on Learning Satisfaction, Class Participation, Learning Motivation and Clinical Competency in Nursing Students", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6807-6815, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.10.6807
  38. Y. H. Kim, Learning Motivations, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Problem Solving Processes after Practice Education Evaluation, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 15, pp. 6176-186, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.10.6176
  39. Y. Lee. Investigating the relationships among goal orientation, self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online inquiry-based learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 2003.
  40. H. Y. Lee. Study on the relationships among achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, attitude toward distance education, self-regulated learning strategies, achievement, participation, satisfaction in distance education. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 2005.
  41. M. Kim, M. W. Choi, K. Lee, "A Study on the characters of leaners affecting the success of learning under e-learning circumstances for universities", Journal of Korean Technology Education Association, vol. 8, pp. 221-236, 2007.
  42. H. Park, M. Choi, "Relationships between e-learning effectiveness and its related factors in higher education", Journal of educational technology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 27-53, 2008.
  43. S. A. Karabenick, "Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking", Journal of educational psychology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 569-581, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569

Cited by

  1. An Action Research on Flipped Learning for Fundamental Nursing Practice Courses vol.24, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2017.24.4.265