Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantifying the seismic resilience of two tall buildings designed using Chinese and US Codes

  • Tian, Yuan (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Steel and Concrete Composite Structures, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Lu, Xiao (Department of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University) ;
  • Lu, Xinzheng (Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Li, Mengke (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Steel and Concrete Composite Structures, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Guan, Hong (Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus)
  • Received : 2016.01.19
  • Accepted : 2016.08.02
  • Published : 2016.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With ongoing development of earthquake engineering research and the lessons learnt from a series of strong earthquakes, the seismic design concept of "resilience" has received much attention. Resilience describes the capability of a structure or a city to recover rapidly after earthquakes or other disasters. As one of the main features of urban constructions, tall buildings have greater impact on the sustainability and resilience of major cities. Therefore, it is important and timely to quantify their seismic resilience. In this work, a quantitative comparison of the seismic resilience of two tall buildings designed according to the Chinese and US seismic design codes was conducted. The prototype building, originally designed according to the US code as part of the Tall Building Initiative (TBI) Project, was redesigned in this work according to the Chinese codes under the same design conditions. Two refined nonlinear finite element (FE) models were established for both cases and their seismic responses were evaluated at different earthquake intensities, including the service level earthquake (SLE), the design-based earthquake (DBE) and the maximum considered earthquake (MCE). In addition, the collapse fragility functions of these two building models were established through incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Based on the numerical results, the seismic resilience of both models was quantified and compared using the new-generation seismic performance assessment method proposed by FEMA P-58. The outcomes of this study indicate that the seismic resilience of the building according to the Chinese design is slightly better than that according to the US design. The conclusions drawn from this research are expected to guide further in-depth studies on improving the seismic resilience of tall buildings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Key Technology R&D Program

References

  1. Almufti, I. and Willford, M. (2013), "REDiTM Rating System: Resilience-based Earthquake Design Initiative for the Next Generation of Buildings", ARUP Co.
  2. Asgarian, B., Sadrinezhad, A. and Alanjari, P. (2010), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frames through incremental dynamic analysis", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.001
  3. Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (1994a), "Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. I: Methodology", J. Struct. Eng., 120(11), 3320-3344. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:11(3320)
  4. Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (1994b), "Seismic hazard analysis of nonlinear structures. II: Applications", J. Struct. Eng., 120(11), 3345-3365. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:11(3345)
  5. Bertero, V.V. (1977), "Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments", Struct. Eng. Struct. Mech., 53(1), 29-79.
  6. Biondini, F., Camnasio, E. and Titi, A. (2015), "Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(14), 2445-2466. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2591
  7. Bruneau, M., Chang, S.E., Eguchi, R.T., Lee, G.C., O'Rourke, T.D., Reinhorn, A.M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W.A. and von Winterfeldt, D. (2003), "A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities", Earthq. Spectra, 19(4), 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
  8. Chang, S.E. and Shinozuka, M. (2004), "Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities", Earthq. Spectra, 20(3), 739-755. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775796
  9. Chang, C.M., Wang, Z.H., Spencer, Jr. B.F. and Chen, Z.Q. (2013), "Semi-active damped outriggers for seismic protection of high-rise buildings", Smart Struct. Syst., 11(5), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.11.5.435
  10. Christovasilis, I.P., Filiatrault, A., Constantinou, M.C. and Wanitkorkul, A. (2009), "Incremental dynamic analysis of woodframe buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(4), 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.864
  11. Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M. and Bruneau, M. (2010), "Seismic resilience of a hospital system", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 6(1-2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663847
  12. GB50011-2010. (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
  13. Comerio, M.C. (2000), "The economic benefits of a disaster resistant university: Earthquake loss estimation for UC Berkeley", Institute of Urban & Regional Development, Berkeley, California, USA.
  14. Comerio, M.C. and Blecher, H.E. (2010), "Estimating downtime from data on residential buildings after the Northridge and Loma Prieta Earthquakes", Earthq. Spectra, 26(4), 951-965. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3477993
  15. Davis Langdon. (2010), "Program cost model for PEER tall buildings study concrete dual system structural option", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  16. Deco, A., Bocchini, P. and Frangopol, D.M. (2013), "A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1469-1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2282
  17. Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H. and Lignos D.G. (2013), "An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2191
  18. Fan, H., Li, Q.S., Tuan, A.Y. and Xu, L.H. (2009), "Seismic analysis of the world's tallest building", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(5), 1206-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.10.005
  19. FEMA. (2008), Casualty Consequence Function and Building Population Model Development (FEMA P-58/BD-3.7.8), Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington, DC, USA.
  20. FEMA. (2009), Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695), Federal Emergency Management Agency;Washington, DC, USA.
  21. FEMA. (2012a), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Volume 1 - Methodology (FEMA P-58-1), Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington, DC, USA.
  22. FEMA. (2012b), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Volume 2 - Implementation guide (FEMA P-58-2), Federal Emergency Management Agency;Washington, DC, USA.
  23. He, M.J., Li, Z., Ma, R.L. and Liang, F. (2014), "Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic performance of a super tall steel tower", Earthq. Struct., 7(4), 571-586. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.571
  24. Hemsas, M., Elachachi, S.M. and Breysse, D. (2014), "Seismic response and damage development analyses of an RC structural wall building using macro-element", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 447-470. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.447
  25. Jacques, C.C., Mcintosh, J., Giovinazzi, S., Kirsch, T.D., Wilson, T. and Mitrani-Reise, J. (2014), "Resilience of the Canterbury hospital system to the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 30(1), 533-554. https://doi.org/10.1193/032013EQS074M
  26. Jiang, H.J., Fu, B., Liu, L.E. and Yin, X.W. (2014), "Study on seismic performance of a super-tall steel-concrete hybrid structure", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 23(5), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1040
  27. Kim, S. and Lee, K. (2013), "Seismic performance of wind-designed diagrid tall steel buildings in regions of moderate seismicity and strong wind", Steel Compos. Struct., 14(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.2.155
  28. Kircher, C.A. (2003), "It makes dollars and sense to improve nonstructural system performance", Proceedings of ATC 29-2 Seminar on Seismic Design, Performance, and Retrofit of Nonstructural Components in Critical Facilities, Newport Beach, CA, USA, October.
  29. Liu, X.J. and Jiang, H.J. (2013), "Stake-of-the-art of performance-based seismic research on nonstructural components", J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 33(6), 53-62. (in Chinese)
  30. Lu, X., Lu, X.Z., Zhang, W.K. and Ye, L.P. (2011), "Collapse simulation of a super high-rise building subjected to extremely strong earthquakes", Sci. China-Technol. Sci., 54(10), 2549-2560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4548-0
  31. Lu, X., Lu, X.Z., Guan, H. and Ye, L.P. (2013b), "Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(5), 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2240
  32. Lu, X., Lu, X.Z., Sezen, H. and Ye, L.P. (2014), "Development of a simplified model and seismic energy dissipation in a super-tall building", Eng. Struct., 67, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.017
  33. Lu, X.L., Zou, Y., Lu, W.S. and Zhao, B. (2007), "Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(4), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.634
  34. Lu, X.Z., Lu, X., Guan, H., Zhang, W.K. and Ye, L.P. (2013a), "Earthquake-induced collapse simulation of a super-tall mega-braced frame-core tube building", J. Constr. Steel Res., 82, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.004
  35. Lu, X.Z., Xie, L.L., Guan, H., Huang, Y.L. and Lu, X. (2015a), "A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 98, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.006
  36. Lu, X.Z., Li, M.K., Guan, H., Lu, X. and Ye, L.P. (2015b), "A Comparative case study on seismic design of tall RC frame-core-tube structures in China and USA", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 24(9), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1206
  37. Lu, X., Lu, X.Z., Guan, H. and Xie, L.L. (2016a), "Application of earthquake-induced collapse analysis in design optimization of a super-tall building", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., doi: 10.1002/tal.1291.
  38. Lu, X.Z., Xie, L.L., Yu, C. and Lu, X. (2016b), "Development and application of a simplified model for the design of a super-tall mega-braced frame-core tube building", Eng. Struct., 110, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.039
  39. Mieler, M.W., Stojadinovic, B., Budnitz, R.J., Mahin, S.A. and Comerio, M.C. (2013), "Toward resilient communities: A performance-based engineering framework for design and evaluation of the built environment", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA, September.
  40. Moehle, J., Bozorgnia, Y., Jayaram, N., Jones, P., Rahnama, M., Shome, N., Tuna, Z., Wallace, J., Yang, T. and Zareian, F. (2011), "Case studies of the seismic performance of tall buildings designed by alternative means", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA, July.
  41. Nazri, F.M. and Ken, P.Y. (2014), "Seismic performance of moment resisting steel frame subjected to earthquake excitations", Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 8(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0240-3
  42. Poon, D., Hsiao, L., Zhu, Y., Joseph, L., Zuo, S., Fu, G. and Ihtiyar, O. (2011), "Non-Linear Time History Analysis for the Performance Based Design of Shanghai Tower", Structures Congress 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, April.
  43. PPD-8 (2011), Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-8: National Preparedness, http://www.dhs.gov/presidential-policy-directive-8-national-preparedness, the White House, Washington, DC, USA, March 20, 2011. [accessed 8 January 2016]
  44. PPD-21 (2013). Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-21, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil, the White House, Washington, DC, USA, February 12, 2013. [accessed 8 January 2016]
  45. Rose, A. (2004), "Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters", Disaster Prevent. Manage., 13(4), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560410556528
  46. Shi, W., Lu, X.Z., Guan, H. and Ye L.P. (2014), "Development of seismic collapse capacity spectra and parametric study", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(9), 1241-1256. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.9.1241
  47. Takewaki, I. and Tsujimoto, H. (2011), "Scaling of design earthquake ground motions for tall buildings based on drift and input energy demands", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.2.171
  48. TBI. (2010), Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; Berkeley, California, USA.
  49. United Nations Development Programme (2015), UNDP announces '5-10-50' - new global programme in support of disaster resilience, http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2015/03/17/undp-announces-5-10-50-new-global-programme-in-support-of-disaster-resilience.html, UNDP, 17 March, 2015. [accessed 29 December 2015].
  50. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  51. Wikipedia Contributors (2015), List of tallest buildings in Christchurch, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Christchurch&oldid=675499611, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 10 August 2015, 23:55 UTC. [accessed 23 August 2015]

Cited by

  1. Research on the Rational Yield Ratio of Isolation System and Its Application to the Design of Seismically Isolated Reinforced Concrete Frame-Core Tube Tall Buildings vol.7, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7111191
  2. Floor acceleration control of super-tall buildings with vibration reduction substructures vol.26, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1343
  3. Parametric sensitivity study on regional seismic damage prediction of reinforced masonry buildings based on time-history analysis vol.15, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0168-9
  4. Framework for city‐scale building seismic resilience simulation and repair scheduling with labor constraints driven by time–history analysis vol.35, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12496
  5. Comparison of seismic performance between typical structural steel buildings designed following the Chinese and United States codes vol.24, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220986633
  6. Component deformation-based collapse evaluation of RC frame under different collapse criteria vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.113
  7. Novel seismic-progressive collapse resilient super-tall building system vol.41, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102790
  8. Probabilistic integrated framework and models compatible with the reliability methods for seismic resilience assessment of structures vol.34, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.089
  9. Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame-shear wall buildings using seismic isolation for resilient performance vol.34, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.081