DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development a numerical model of flow and contaminant transport in layered soils

  • Ahmadi, Hossein (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran) ;
  • Namin, Masoud M. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran) ;
  • Kilanehei, Fouad (Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University)
  • Received : 2016.11.01
  • Accepted : 2017.01.10
  • Published : 2016.12.25

Abstract

Contaminant transport in groundwater induces major threat and harmful effect on the environment; hence, the fate of the contaminant migration in groundwater is seeking a lot of attention. In this paper a two dimensional numerical flow and transport model through saturated layered soil is developed. Groundwater flow and solute transport has been simulated numerically using proposed model. The model implements the finite volume time splitting method to discretize the main equations. The performance, accuracy and efficiency of the out coming numerical models have been successfully examined by two test cases. The verification test cases consist of two-dimensional, groundwater flow and solute transport. The final purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare the shape of contaminant plume in homogeneous and heterogeneous media with different soil properties and control of solute transport using a zone for minimizing the potential of groundwater contamination; furthermore, this model leads to select the effective and optimum remedial strategies for cleaning the contaminated aquifers.

Keywords

References

  1. Abolbashari, M.H. and Hosseini, M. (2016), "Generalized coupled non-fickian/non-fourierian diffusion-thermoelasticity analysis subjected to shock loading using analytical method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 60(3), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.3.529
  2. Bardet, J.P. and Tobita, T. (2002), "A practical method for solving free-surface seepage problems", Comput. Geotech., 29(6), 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00003-4
  3. Bear, J. and Cheng, A.D. (2010), Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport, Springer, New York, U.S.A.
  4. Borja, R.I. and Kishnani, S.S. (1991), "On the solution of elliptic free boundary problems via Newton's method", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 88(3), 341-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(91)90094-M
  5. Boufadel, M.C., Suidan, M.T. and Venosa, A.D. (1999), "Numerical modeling of water flow below dry salt lakes: effect of capillarity and viscosity", J. Hydrol., 24(221), 55-74.
  6. Charles, D. and Shackelford, D.E. (1991), "Diffusion in saturated soil", J. Geotech. Eng., 12,101-117.
  7. Chung, K.Y. and Kikuchi, N. (1987), "Adaptive methods to solve free boundary problems of flow through porous media", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 11(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610110103
  8. Chunmiao, Z. and Gordon, D. (1995), Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling, Wiley, New York, U.S.A.
  9. Darbandi, M. and Daghighi, Y. (2007), "A moving mesh finite volume method to solve free surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 31(14), 1609-1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.611
  10. Desai, C.S. and Li, G.C. (1983), "A residual flow procedure and application for free surface flow in porous media", Adv. Water Res., 6(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(83)90076-3
  11. El-Zein, A. (2008), "A general approach to the modeling of contaminant transport through composite landfill liners with intact or leaking geomembranes", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 32(3), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.626
  12. Gallo, C. and Manzini, G. (2001), "A fully coupled numerical model for two-phase flow with contaminant transport and biodegradation kinetics", Commun. Numer. Meth. Eng., 17(5), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.409
  13. Herrera, P. and Massabo, M. and Beckie, D. (2009), "A meshless method to simulate solute transport in heterogeneous porous media", Adv. Water Res., 32(3), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.12.005
  14. Holm, E.J. and Langtangen, H.P. (1999), "A method for simulating sharp fluid interfaces in groundwater flow", Adv. Water Res., 23(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00003-2
  15. Huang, W. and Smith, C., Lerner, D. and Thornton, S. (2002), "Physical modeling of solute transport in porous media evaluation of an imaging technique using UV excited fluorescent dye", Water Res., 36(7), 1843-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00393-1
  16. Hulagabaly, A.M., Solanki, C.H. and Dodagoudar, G.R. (2014), "Contaminant transport modeling through saturated porous media using finite difference and finite element methods", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 14, 29-38.
  17. Igboekwe, M. and Achi, N. (2011), "Finite difference method of modeling ground water flow", J. Water Res. Protect., 3, 192-198. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2011.33025
  18. Jobson, H.E. and Harbaugh, A.W. (1999), "Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (daflow) for coupling to the modular finite-difference ground water flow model (modflow)", U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 99-217.
  19. Khoshghalb, A and Khalili, N. (2013), "A meshfree method for fully coupled analysis of flow and deformation in unsaturated porous media", J. Numer. Analyt. Methods Geomech., 37(7), 716-743. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1120
  20. Lacy, S.J. and Prevost, J.H. (1987), "Flow through porous media: a procedure for locating the free surface", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 11(6), 585-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610110605
  21. Li, Y. and Cleall, P. (2011), "Analytical solutions for advective-dispersive solute transport in double-layered finite porous media", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 35(4), 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.903
  22. Millingtonan, J. and Quirk, P. (1961), "Permeability of Porous Solids", Transac. Faraday Soc., 57, 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9615701200
  23. Mousavi, N.M., Javadi, A.A., Al-Tabbaa, A. and Abbasi, F. (2011), "Stochastic finite element modelling of water flow in variably saturated heterogeneous soils", J. Numer. Analy. Meth. Geomech., 35(12), 1389-1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.966
  24. Namin, M.M. (2003), "A fully three dimensional non hydrostatic free surface flow model for hydro environmental predictions", Ph.D. Dissertation, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Wales, U.K.
  25. Oden, J.T. and Kikuchi, N. (1980), “Recent advances: Theory of variational inequalities with applications to problems of flow through porous media”, J. Eng. Sci., 18(10), 1173-1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(80)90111-1
  26. Satavalekar, R.S. and Sawant, V.A, (2014), “Numerical modelling of contaminant transport using FEM and meshfree method”, Adv. Environ. Res., 3(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2014.3.2.117
  27. Sudicky, E.A. (1989), "The laplace transformation Galerkin technique: A time continuous finite element theory and application to mass transport in ground water", Water Res. Res., 25(8), 1833-1846. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i008p01833
  28. Yaneko, N.N. (1971), The Method of Fractional Steps, Springer Verlag, New York, U.S.A.
  29. Zhang, J., Xu, Q. and Chen, Z. (2001), "Seepage analysis based on the unified unsaturated soil theory", Mech. Res. Commun., 28(1), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-6413(01)00151-3
  30. Zhang, Q., Volker, R.E. and Lockington, D.A. (2002), "Experimental investigation of contaminant transport in coastal groundwater", Adv. Environ. Res., 6(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00054-5

Cited by

  1. A comparative study of granular activated carbon and sand as water filtration media with estimation of model parameters vol.6, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2017.6.1.035
  2. Natural resource management: A systematic literature review vol.9, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2020.9.4.295
  3. Experimental evaluation of self‐remediation mechanism by groundwater flow in unconfined aquifers vol.93, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1489
  4. Impact of Pumping Rate on Contaminant Transport in Groundwater-A Numerical Study vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030103