DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Breastfeeding Duration and Parity on the Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Sung, Ho Kyung (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ma, Seung Hyun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Ji-Yeob (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hwang, Yunji (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Choonghyun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Byoung-Gie (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Man (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae Weon (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Sokbom (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kim, Jaehoon (Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Jin (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Keun-Young (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Daehee (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Suekyung (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.06.29
  • Accepted : 2016.09.08
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize current evidence regarding the association of parity and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: A systematic search of relevant studies published by December 31, 2015 was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. A random-effect model was used to obtain the summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Thirty-two studies had parity categories of 1, 2, and ${\geq}3$. The summary RRs for EOC were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.65), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.52), respectively. Small to moderate heterogeneity was observed for one birth (p<0.01; Q = 59.46; $I^2=47.9%$). Fifteen studies had breastfeeding categories of <6 months, 6-12 months, and >13 months. The summary RRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.87), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.79), respectively. Only small heterogeneity was observed for <6 months of breastfeeding (p = 0.17; Q = 18.79, $I^2=25.5%$). Compared to nulliparous women with no history of breastfeeding, the joint effects of two births and <6 months of breastfeeding resulted in a 0.5-fold reduced risk for EOC. Conclusions: The first birth and breastfeeding for <6 months were associated with significant reductions in EOC risk.

Keywords

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 [cited 2016 Nov 20]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
  2. Prat J; FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: abridged republication. J Gynecol Oncol 2015;26(2):87-89. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.87
  3. Colombo N, Peiretti M, Castiglione M; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009;20 Suppl 4:24-26.
  4. Clarke-Pearson DL. Clinical practice. Screening for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;361(2):170-177. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0901926
  5. Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(10):1184-1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116427
  6. Harris R, Whittemore AS, Itnyre J. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. III. Epithelial tumors of low malignant potential in white women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(10):1204-1211. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116428
  7. Fathalla MF. Incessant ovulation--a factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet 1971;2(7716):163.
  8. Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. IV. The pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136(10):1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116429
  9. Risch HA, Marrett LD, Howe GR. Parity, contraception, infertility, and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140(7):585-597. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117296
  10. Ness RB, Grisso JA, Klapper J, Schlesselman JJ, Silberzweig S, Vergona R, et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):233-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/152.3.233
  11. Titus-Ernstoff L, Perez K, Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Baron JA, Greenberg ER. Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2001;84(5):714-721. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1596
  12. Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S, Correia N, Nordlinder H, Magnusson CM, et al. Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: results of a Swedish case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83(3):575-585. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6451
  13. Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S, Correia N, Nordlinder H, Magnusson CM, et al. Risk factors for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: results from a Swedish case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156(4):363-373. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf048
  14. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, et al. A prospective study of reproductive factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer 1995;76(2):284-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<284::AID-CNCR2820760219>3.0.CO;2-5
  15. Weiderpass E, Sandin S, Inoue M, Shimazu T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, et al. Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan - results from the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study cohort. Int J Oncol 2012;40(1):21-30. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2011.1194
  16. Yang HP, Trabert B, Murphy MA, Sherman ME, Sampson JN, Brinton LA, et al. Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtypes in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int J Cancer 2012;131(4):938-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26469
  17. Gwinn ML, Lee NC, Rhodes PH, Layde PM, Rubin GL. Pregnancy, breast feeding, and oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43(6):559-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90160-Q
  18. Danforth KN, Tworoger SS, Hecht JL, Rosner BA, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. Breastfeeding and risk of ovarian cancer in two prospective cohorts. Cancer Causes Control 2007;18(5):517-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-0130-2
  19. Siskind V, Green A, Bain C, Purdie D. Breastfeeding, menopause, and epithelial ovarian cancer. Epidemiology 1997;8(2): 188-191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199703000-00011
  20. Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J, Halpern J. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. I. Methods. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(10):1175-1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116426
  21. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Trikalinos TA, Lau J. A summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's evidence report on breastfeeding in developed countries. Breastfeed Med 2009;4 Suppl 1:S17-S30. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2008.0133
  22. Luan NN, Wu QJ, Gong TT, Vogtmann E, Wang YL, Lin B. Breastfeeding and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98(4):1020-1031. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.062794
  23. Li DP, Du C, Zhang ZM, Li GX, Yu ZF, Wang X, et al. Breastfeeding and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 epidemiological studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15(12):4829-4837. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.12.4829
  24. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283(15):2008-2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  26. Fishman A. The effects of parity, breastfeeding, and infertility treatment on the risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20(11 Suppl 2):S31-S33. https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f60d4d
  27. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [cited 2016 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  28. Schlesselman JJ, Stolley PD. Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982, p. 33-34.
  29. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev 1987;9:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298
  30. Fleiss JL, Gross AJ. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44(2):127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90261-7
  31. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21(11):1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
  32. Godos J, Bella F, Torrisi A, Sciacca S, Galvano F, Grosso G. Dietary patterns and risk of colorectal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Hum Nutr Diet 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12395.
  33. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315 (7109):629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  34. Berlin JA, Longnecker MP, Greenland S. Meta-analysis of epidemiologic dose-response data. Epidemiology 1993;4(3):218-228. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199305000-00005
  35. Konishi I. Gonadotropins and ovarian carcinogenesis: a new era of basic research and its clinical implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(1):16-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00425.x
  36. Bu SZ, Yin DL, Ren XH, Jiang LZ, Wu ZJ, Gao QR, et al. Progesterone induces apoptosis and up-regulation of p53 expression in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer 1997;79 (10):1944-1950. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<1944::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-V
  37. McNeilly AS. Lactational control of reproduction. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001;13(7-8):583-590. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD01056

Cited by

  1. Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women vol.60, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000318
  2. Risk Reduction of Breast Cancer by Childbirth, Breastfeeding, and Their Interaction in Korean Women: Heterogeneous Effects Across Menopausal Status, Hormone Receptor Status, and Pathological Subtypes vol.50, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.152
  3. The impact of historical breastfeeding practices on the incidence of cancer in France in 2015 vol.29, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1015-2
  4. The role of pregnancy, perinatal factors and hormones in maternal cancer risk: a review of the evidence vol.283, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12747
  5. Postpartum Cardiomyopathy and Considerations for Breastfeeding vol.4, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2018.21.2
  6. Association of serum lipids and severity of epithelial ovarian cancer: an observational cohort study of 349 Chinese patients vol.32, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7555/jbr.32.20170096
  7. Breastfeeding factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer vol.153, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.017
  8. Critical questions in ovarian cancer research and treatment: Report of an American Association for Cancer Research Special Conference vol.125, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32004
  9. Novel Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Screening vol.21, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0816-0
  10. Gender of offspring and risk of ovarian cancer: The HOPE study vol.64, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2019.101646
  11. The Ketogenic Diet Including Breast Milk for Treatment of Infants with Severe Childhood Epilepsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0190
  12. Supporting Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Factory Workers and Their Unemployed Neighbors: Peer Counseling in Bangladesh vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419871229
  13. Association of Social and Community Factors with U.S. Breastfeeding Outcomes vol.15, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2020.0083
  14. Offspring sex and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies vol.35, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00682-9
  15. Breastfeeding Among Mothers Who Have Experienced Childhood Maltreatment: A Review vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420950257
  16. “I was determined to breastfeed, and I always found a solution”: successful experiences of exclusive breastfeeding among Chinese mothers in Ireland vol.15, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00292-x
  17. Human Milk Microbiota and Oligosaccharides: A Glimpse into Benefits, Diversity, and Correlations vol.13, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041123
  18. Couples talk about breastfeeding: Interviews with parents about decision-making, challenges, and the role of fathers and professional support vol.8, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029211029158
  19. Pregnancy, preeclampsia and maternal aging: From epidemiology to functional genomics vol.73, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101535