한국축산식품학회지 (Food Science of Animal Resources)

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.100-108
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2636-0772(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2636-0780(eISSN)
한국축산식품학회 (Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inactivation of Salmonella on Eggshells by Chlorine Dioxide Gas

  • 투고 : 2015.11.18
  • 심사 : 2016.01.07
  • 발행 : 2016.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Microbiological contamination of eggs should be prevented in the poultry industry, as poultry is one of the major reservoirs of human Salmonella. ClO2 gas has been reported to be an effective disinfectant in various industry fields, particularly the food industry. The aims of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of chlorine dioxide gas on two strains of Salmonella inoculated onto eggshells under various experimental conditions including concentrations, contact time, humidity, and percentage organic matter. As a result, it was shown that chlorine dioxide gas under wet conditions was more effective in inactivating Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Gallinarum compared to that under dry conditions independently of the presence of organic matter (yeast extract). Under wet conditions, a greater than 4 log reduction in bacterial populations was achieved after 30 min of exposure to ClO2 each at 20 ppm, 40 ppm, and 80 ppm against S. Enteritidis; 40 ppm and 80 ppm against S. Gallinarum. These results suggest that chlorine dioxide gas is an effective agent for controlling Salmonella, the most prevalent contaminant in the egg industry.

키워드

Introduction

Microbiological contamination in table eggs is concerning to consumers and thus safety measures are required in the egg industry. In fact, Salmonella is the most common cause of food poisoning in the US. Because poultry is one of the major reservoirs of human Salmonella (Bae et al., 2013), control measures in this source become a critical issue in the domestic egg industry. Previous studies showed that the isolation rate of Salmonella spp. from chicken cecal contents was quite high at 21.3% (Cheong et al., 2007). Zoonotic bacteria present in the digestive tracts of poultry may contaminate the egg contents or eggshell during egg production. Consumption or handling of the contaminated eggs can then cause human infections.

Salmonellosis is one of the most important and widely distributed foodborne bacterial illness (CDC, 2008; WHO, 2013). Salmonella spp., particularly Salmonella Enteritidis (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis; SE), have been attributed to many food-borne disease outbreaks in humans, which were traced back to eggshells (Braden, 2006; Chousalkar et al., 2010; ECDC, 2014; Morgan et al., 2007; Zielicka-Hardy et al., 2012) The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) estimates that 142,000 illnesses are caused by consuming eggs contaminated with SE each year (FDA, 2009). In the US, multi-state outbreaks of human SE infection associated with shell eggs occurred in 2010, resulting in approximately 1939 illnesses (CDC, 2010). In Europe, multi-country outbreaks of SE infection have been associated with the consumption of eggs produced in Germany. Outbreaks in Austria, France, and Germany were traced to the same egg packaging center in southern Germany (ECDC, 2014).

In the hatching egg industry, hygienic management is directly linked to the hatching rate. Bacterial diseases, such as fowl typhoid (FT) and pullorum disease (PD) result in large costs to the hatching egg industry by lowering the hatchout rate. These diseases are serious problems in the many countries where measures for controlling bacterial diseases are not sufficient.

FT and PD, caused by Salmonella Gallinarum (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Gallinarum; SG) and Salmonella Pullorum (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Pullorum; SP), respectively, are among the most significant diseases in poultry. In chicks and poults, SG and SP cause diarrhea, dehydration, anorexia, weakness, and high mortality. These diseases in mature fowl cause lower egg production and hatchout rates combined as well as anorexia and high mortality. Trans-ovarial infection, leading to infection of the egg and the chick, is one of the most significant infection routes related to these diseases (Shivaprasad, 2000). FT and PD have nearly disappeared from commercial poultry meats in developed nations, including the US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, and many European countries. However, these diseases are common in countries in Central and South America, Asia, and Africa (CFSPH, 2010; Shivaprasad, 2000).

In Korea, outbreaks of FT and PD have been increasing since the 1990s, inflicting economic damage on domestic poultry farms. Thus, a live attenuated SG vaccine is used in broilers to prevent FT. However, the efficacy of this vaccine remains uncertain, and live vaccines cannot be used in layer hens because of the potential for egg-transmitted infections (Kim et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007; Kwon et al., 2010). Therefore, new methods to prevent these two chronic diseases are required.

Chlorine, usually used as disinfectant, produces trihalomethanes and chlorophenols which are reported as a potentially mutagenic compounds or carcinogenic substances (Dunnick and Melnick, 1993; Owusuyaw et al., 1990). Researchers have focused on chlorine dioxide as chlorine’s alternative sanitizer. Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) produces less substance when it reacts with organic compounds. Furthermore, it is more stable and has 5 times higher sterilizing power than chlorine (Beuchat et al., 2004; Kim et al., 1998; Moore et al., 1980).

In this study, we chose chlorine dioxide (ClO2) as a disinfecting agent to control microorganism-contaminated eggshells. In addition, the disinfection efficacy of ClO2 solution in dentistry, for example, with dental materials and instruments and for oral hygiene, has been studied (Agnihotry et al., 2014; Drake and Villhauer, 2011; Watamoto et al., 2013).

In 1998, the FDA approved the use of ClO2 solution for washing fruits and vegetables. In turn, ClO2 was approved as an alternative sanitizer by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US FDA for postharvest application to fruits and vegetables in 2006 (FDA, 1998; Sun et al., 2014). Recently, many studies have reported the advantages of gaseous ClO2. ClO2 gas is more diffusible than aqueous form, making it more efficient for eliminating microorganisms in food or on food processing surfaces (Du et al., 2002). Gaseous from has been shown to be more effective than aqueous form at the same concentration against Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of green peppers (Han et al., 2001). Additionally, the freshness and quality of food can be reduced through contact with water, and thus, disinfectants in gaseous forms are more appropriate than the aqueous form.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of ClO2 gas on salmonellae inoculated onto eggshells under laboratory-controlled settings. Choi et al. (2015) reported that aqueous ClO2 has an efficacy of reducing Salmonella enterica on the surface of eggshells. This study is analogous to ours, but we used gaseous ClO2 and controlled environmental factors such as exposure time of wide range, varying concentrations and humidity.

 

Materials and Methods

Egg samples

Eggs were collected from a market or an egg-packing center. Very dirty eggs with visible fecal contamination were excluded from the experiment samples.

ClO2 gas-generating system

The ClO2 gas was generated by a ClO2 generator (CA- 300, PurgoFarm, Korea). Aqueous NaClO2 was passed through the patented multi-porous membrane electrode assembly, producing highly pure ClO2 gas (>98% ClO2). After a sequence of electrochemical reactions, ClO2 gas was released through a vent into a collecting chamber in the dark. The stream of ClO2 was controlled by a valve to maintain the desired ClO2 concentration in the treatment chamber. During treatment, the ClO2 concentration in the chamber was monitored using a PortaSens II gas leak detector (C-16, Analytic Technology, USA) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.ClO2 gas-generating system used in this study.

SE (ATCC 13076) and SG (ATCC9184) were selected as test bacteria. Each strain was incubated in nutrient broth (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) for 24±2 h at 37℃. The inoculum density was found to be ≥ 0.01 absorbance at 600 nm by using a micro ELISA plate reader (VERSAmax, Molecular Devices, USA).

Inoculation of egg

SE and SG were inoculated onto the eggshells of clean eggs. The inoculation was performed by spotting 100 μL of the test inoculum (>106 CFU/mL of the test organism) with sterilized micropipette tips onto the surface of the eggshell.

The government guidelines on disinfectants efficacy recommends that 5% (w/v) yeast extract is used as substitute for organic matter to determine the bacterial reduction (QIA, 2013). Therefore, to set up the environment containing organic matter, 96 mL of 5% or 10% yeast extract (Sigma, USA) solution and 4 mL of a test inoculum were vortexed together, and then 100 μL of this mixture was spotted onto each eggshell. All eggs used in the experiments were allowed to dry at room temperature for 40-60 min.

Exposure to ClO2 gas

Following inoculation of the bacterial suspensions and drying, two eggs for each bacterial sample were exposed to ClO2 gas. Two untreated eggs were used as a control. All treatments were performed in triplicate.

Environmental factors, including concentrations (ppm), contact time (min), humidity (% RH), and percentage organic matter, were applied differently during gas exposure. The applications of these environmental factors are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.Application of environmental factors during exposure to ClO2 gas

Determination of bacterial contamination of eggshells

To measure bacteria on the eggshells, the egg was placed aseptically into a plastic bag containing 50 mL sterile distilled water and shaken for 10 min on an orbital shaker. One milliliter of the resulting water sample was serially diluted by 10-fold.

Xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (Oxoid, UK) for SE and the Salmonella Chromogenic Agar Base with Salmonella Selective Supplement SR0194 (Oxoid, UK) for SG were inoculated with 100 μL of each 10-fold serially diluted sample. Agars were incubated for 24±2 h at 37℃.

Statistical analysis

Bacterial counts were log10-transformed prior to statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical package (version 17.0, SPSS Inc., USA). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Results

Disinfectant efficacy changes with concentration and exposure time

We evaluated the efficacy of ClO2 gas against SE under wet conditions (80±5% RH). The change in ClO2 concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 ppm) and exposure time (5, 10, 30 min) reduced SE contamination after inoculation (Fig. 2). Exposure to 5 ppm ClO2 gas reduced SE by <2 log (0.36, 0.51, 1.67 log) after 5, 10, and 30 min. With 10 ppm, 20 ppm, and 40 ppm ClO2 gas exposure, SE was reduced by <2 log (0.49, 0.90 log-10 ppm/0.92, 1.62 log-20 ppm/1.63, 1.69 log-40 ppm) after 5 and 10 min of exposure. A reduction of 2-4 log occurred at 10 ppm after 30 min (3.22 log), and at 80 ppm after 5 and 10 min (2.45, 2.87 log). A >4 log reduction was achieved by exposure to 20 ppm (4.49 log), 40 ppm (5.3 log), 80 ppm (6.45 log) for 30 min.

Fig. 2.Effect of chlorine dioxide gas at various concentrations and exposure times on the inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells under the wet condition.

Fig. 3.Effects of the concentrations of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells under dry or wet conditions without organic matter. Samples were exposed to ClO2 gas for 5 min. *, **, ***: significant difference was found (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively).

We evaluated the efficacy of ClO2 gas against SG under the wet condition (80±5% RH). The reduction in SG surface contamination changed with varying concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 ppm) and exposure times (5, 10, 30 min) (Fig. 6). SG contamination on the eggshells was reduced by <2 log at 5 ppm ClO2 gas exposure for 5, 10, and 30 min (0.33, 0.48, 0.63 log), 10 ppm for 5 and 10 min (0.70, 0.96 log), at 20 ppm for 5 and 10 min (1.02, 1.32 log), 40 ppm for 5 min (1.18 log), and 80 ppm for 5 min (1.97 log). SG was reduced by 2-4 log at 10 ppm and 20 ppm after 30 min (2.10, 2.43 log), and 40 ppm and 80 ppm after 10 min (2.16, 288 log). An exposure time of 30 min was required to achieve a >4 log reduction at 40 ppm (4.83 log) and 80 ppm (6.82 log).

Disinfectant efficacy changes with humidity and organic matter

ClO2 gas showed a relatively strong bactericidal effect against SE, regardless of the presence of organic matter (yeast extract, Sigma, USA) under wet as compared to dry conditions.

Exposure to ClO2 gas resulted in 0.37, 065, 1.16, and 1.47 log reductions at 10, 20, 40, and 80 ppm for 5 min under dry conditions without organic matter (Fig. 3). The reductions in SE were 0.49, 0.91, 1.63, and 2.45 log under wet conditions without organic matter. A significant difference (p<0.001) in SE reduction was found between dry conditions and wet conditions with exposure to 40 ppm (p<0.01) and 80 ppm of ClO2 gas for 5 min without organic matter. The SE contamination on eggshells was reduced by 0.23, 0.27, 1.071, and 1.27 log at 10, 20, 40, and 80 ppm, respectively, for 5 min under dry conditions with organic matter (yeast extract, Sigma, USA) (Fig. 4). The reductions in SE were 0.47, 0.51, 1.27, and 1.71 log at the same ClO2 exposures under wet conditions with organic matter. A significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the dry and wet conditions at 80 ppm for 5 min with organic matter.

Fig. 4.Effects of the concentrations of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells under dry or wet conditions with organic matter (10% yeast extract). Samples were exposed to ClO2 gas for 5 min. *, **, ***: significant difference was found (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively).

The reduction in SE on the eggshells by an 80 ppm ClO2 gas treatment for 5 min without organic matter (0% yeast extract) ranged from 2.14 to 2.67 Log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 2.03 to 2.99 Log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum) (Fig. 5). The median and mean of the log reduction in SE without yeast extract were 2.43 and 2.45, respectively. The reduction in SE on the eggshell by the same gas treatment with 5% yeast extract ranged from 1.48 to 2.34 log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 1.37 to 2.43 log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum). The median and mean of the log reduction in SE with 5% yeast extract were 1.73 and 1.85, respectively. The reduction in SE on the eggshells by the same treatment with 10% yeast extract ranged from 1.56 to 1.84 Log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 1.42 to 2.07 Log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum). The median and mean of the log reduction in SE with 10% yeast extract were 1.66 and 1.71, respectively. A significant difference (p<0.001) was observed between SE reductions with 0% yeast extract and 5-10% yeast extract.

Fig. 5.Effect of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Enteritidis on eggshells in the presence of organic matter (0, 5, and 10% yeast extract). The number of viable cells is shown on a bar graph (A) and in log10 reduction (B). ***: significant difference was found (p<0.001).

Exposure to ClO2 gas resulted in 0.20, 0.33, 0.66, and 1.54 log reductions in SG at 10, 20, 40, and 80 ppm, respectively, for 5 min under the dry condition without organic matter (Fig. 7). The reductions in SG were 0.70, 1.02, 1.18, and 1.97 log under the wet condition without organic matter. Significant differences were found between the dry condition and wet condition at 10 ppm (p<0.05), 20 ppm (p<0.001), 40 ppm (p<0.01), and 80 ppm (p<0.05).

Fig. 6.Effect of chlorine dioxide gas at various concentrations and exposure times in inactivating Salmonella Gallinarum on eggshells under wet condition.

Fig. 7.Effects of different concentrations of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Gallinarum on eggshells under dry or wet conditions without organic matter. Samples were exposed to ClO2 gas for 5 min. *, **, ***: significant difference was found (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively).

The SG contamination on eggshells was reduced by 0.10, 0.26, 0.66, and 0.80 log with exposure to 10, 20, 40, and 80 ppm ClO2 gas, respectively, for 5 min under the dry condition with organic matter (yeast extract, Sigma, USA) (Fig. 8). The reductions in SG were 0.49, 0.85, 1.03, and 1.38 log under the wet condition with organic matter. Significant differences were obtained between the dry and wet conditions at 20 ppm (p<0.01) and 80 ppm (p<0.01) ClO2 gas exposure for 5 min with organic matter.

Fig. 8.Effects of different concentrations of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Gallinarum on eggshells under dry or wet conditions with organic matter (10% yeast extract). Samples were exposed to ClO2 gas for 5 min. *, **, ***: significant difference was found (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively).

The reduction in SG on the eggshells by ClO2 gas treatment of 80 ppm for 5 min without organic matter (0% yeast extract) ranged from 1.66 to 2.28 Log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 1.53 to 2.45 Log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum) (Fig. 9). The median and mean log reductions in SG with no added yeast extract were 1.96 and 1.97, respectively. The reduction in SG on the eggshells following the same treatment with 5% yeast extract ranged from 1.77 to 2.40 Log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 0.54 to 2.45 Log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum). The median and mean log reductions in SG with 5% yeast extract were 1.84 and 1.8, respectively. The reductions in SG on the eggshells following the same treatment with 10% yeast extract ranged from 0.93 to 1.55 Log CFU/eggshell (25% to 75%) and from 0.93 to 2.15 Log CFU/eggshell (minimum to maximum). The median and mean log reductions in SG with 10% yeast extract were 1.35 and 1.38, respectively. A significant difference (p<0.05) in SG was observed between the results with 0% yeast extract and with 10% yeast extract.

Fig. 9.Effect of chlorine dioxide gas against Salmonella Gallinarum on eggshells in the presence of organic matter (0, 5, and 10% yeast extract). The number of viable cells is shown on a bar graph (A) and in log10 reduction (B). *: significant difference was found (p<0.05).

 

Discussionc

ClO2 has been known to be a potent sanitizer/disinfectant for more than 40 years (Benarde et al., 1965). Recently, ClO2 in its gaseous form has been used to disinfect space, food, and food-related equipment (Hsu and Huang, 2013; Lee et al., 2004; Lowe et al., 2013; Prodduk et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2014; Trinetta et al., 2012; Trinetta et al., 2013a; Trinetta et al., 2013b). The use of ClO2 gas as an effective disinfectant is promising for the microbial reduction on fruits (Du et al., 2003). Sun et al. (2014) reported that a controlled-release ClO2 gas fumigation technology showed promise as an effective and practical antimicrobial strategy for the commercial clamshell packaging of blueberries and other fruits. Further, Prodduk et al. (2014) found that ClO2 gas treatment was capable of penetrating and inactivating cells attached to inaccessible sites and within biofilms on sprout surface. In this study, the disinfectant efficacy of ClO2 gas varied with environmental factors such as gas concentrations (ppm), exposure time (min), humidity (% RH), and presence of organic matter.

First, the antimicrobial effects of ClO2 gas against SE and SG were evaluated according to changes in gas concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 ppm) and exposure times (5, 10, 30 min) under the wet condition (80±5% RH). We considered a 4-log reduction to be an effective standard based on MFDS Regulations (Surface Tests of Sanitizers and Disinfectants) (MFDS, 2009).

In the case of SE, <4 log reduction was noted when each of the concentration and exposure time of ClO2 gas was 20, 40, or 80 ppm for 30 min. SE is a major pathogen related to food poisoning by contaminated eggs. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of commercial cleaning or sanitizing solutions on eggshells contaminated with SE. Sodium carbonate, sodium hypochlorite, and potassium hydroxide were evaluated for their bactericidal activity on eggshells contaminated with SE. The results indicated that the three chemicals applied at the concentrations recommended by the manufacturer (sodium carbonate, 36 ppm; other treatments, 200 ppm) could not eliminate 104 or 106 CFU/mL of SE from eggshells (Soljour et al., 2004). Iodine- based disinfectants (approximately 75 ppm) and chorine (200 ppm) spray reduced SE by 1.35 log and 1.45 log on the eggshell in one study (Knape et al., 2001). The antimicrobial effects of ClO2 gas against SE observed in this study were remarkable compared with commercial cleaning or sanitizing solutions. A few recent studies investigated the effects of electrolyzed oxidizing water on eggs. They showed a log reduction of ≥2.1 log in SE using electrolyzed oxidizing water, whereas a log reduction of 1.7 log in SE was observed for typical commercial detergent-sanitizer (100 ppm free chlorine solution) treatments. However, both electrolyzed oxidizing water and commercial detergent-sanitizers significantly affected the cuticle layer in eggs (Bialka et al., 2004). The cuticle layer of eggshells plays an important role as a natural barrier (Gole et al., 2014). Destruction of the cuticle layer may be a cause of food poisoning, as it is then becomes easy for microorganisms to penetrate the eggshell.

SG is the causative bacteria of FT, a severe systemic disease in chickens. FT has been eradicated from commercial poultry in many developed countries, including the US, Canada, and most countries in Western Europe (Shivaprasad, 2000). However, this disease remains common in some countries in Central and South America, Africa, and Asia, including Korea (Shivaprasad, 2000). It causes serious economic problems in the poultry industry in Korea, although SG has little public health significance because it has highly adapted to the chicken as a host species. Thus, the efficient control of SG in hatching eggs is particularly important. However, fewer studies on the antimicrobial effects of disinfectants against SG have been carried out than for SE. In this study, we achieved >4 log reduction of SG at 40 ppm and 80 ppm ClO2 gas treatment with a required exposure time of 30 min.

Humidity is one of the crucial factors in reducing microorganisms by ClO2 gas. Previous studies reported that inactivation of bacterial contaminants by ClO2 gas was negatively impacted by a low relative humidity (Lowe et al., 2013). This study also revealed that disinfection of eggshells by ClO2 gas was less effective under the dry condition (30±5%) than under the wet condition (RH 80±5%). Regardless of the bacterial species and organic matter present, the reduction in bacteria by ClO2 gas was greater under high RH conditions. A significant difference was found at a high concentration of ClO2 gas between dry (RH 30±5%) and wet conditions (RH 80±5%).

Most disinfectants, including chlorine and its derivatives, are inactivated by interactions with organic matter. Eggshell surfaces can be contaminated by organic matter such as feces or rice straws during the production process. Therefore, an agent with high efficacy in the presence of organic matter may be effective for disinfecting eggs. When ClO2 gas was used to inhibit SG inoculated onto eggshells under wet conditions, no significant difference was observed in the presence of 0% yeast extract vs. 5% yeast extract. However, the reduction in SE with 5% yeast extract was significantly different from the control. The percentage of organic matter had a greater influence on the effect of ClO2 gas on SE than on SG.

Numerous studies have evaluated the antimicrobial effects of ClO2 in various fields. ClO2 has been studied as an agent for water disinfection and various other purposes (Hsu and Huang, 2015). In this study, ClO2 gas is a considerable sanitizer against Salmonella enterica on eggshells. Like this, industry related with poultry could use ClO2 gas treatment in order to reduce attached salmonellae on poultry skin. With the application of a proper concentration and exposure time, ClO2 gas exposure may be an excellent method for egg disinfection as an alternative to current methods used to sanitize eggs. Moreover, although it needs further study, ClO2 gas could be widely utilized in various food industries.

참고문헌

  1. Agnihotry, A., Gill, K. S., Singhal, D., Fedorowicz, Z., Dash, S., and Pedrazzi, V. (2014) A comparison of the bleaching effectiveness of chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide on dental composite. Braz. Dent. J. 25, 524-527. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300098
  2. Bae, D. H., Dessie, H. K., Baek, H. J., Kim, S. G., Lee, H. S., and Lee, Y. J. (2013) Prevalence and characteristics of Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry slaughterhouses in Korea. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 75, 1193-1200. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.13-0093
  3. Benarde, M. A., Israel, B. M., Olivieri, V. P., and Granstrom, M. L. (1965) Efficiency of chlorine dioxide as a bactericide. Appl. Microbiol. 13, 776-780.
  4. Beuchat, L. R., Pettigrew, C. A., Tremblay, M. E., Roselle, B. J., and Scouten, A. J. (2004) Lethality of chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and a commercial fruit and vegetable sanitizer to vegetative cells and spores of Bacillus cereus and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Food Prot. 67, 1702-1708. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.8.1702
  5. Bialka, K. L., Demirci, A., Knabel, S. J., Patterson, P. H., and Puri, V. M. (2004) Efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water for the microbial safety and quality of eggs. Poult. Sci. 83, 2071-2078. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.12.2071
  6. Braden, C. R. (2006) Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: a national epidemic in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 512-517. https://doi.org/10.1086/505973
  7. CDC (2008) Salmonellosis: General Information. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nczved/divisions/dfbmd/diseases/salmonellosis.
  8. CDC (2010) Multistate outbreak of human Salmonella Enteritidis infections associated with shell eggs. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/enteritidis/
  9. CFSPH (2010) Emerging and exotic diseases of animals textbook, Center for food security and public health, pp. 169-172.
  10. Cheong, H. J., Lee, Y. J., Hwang, I. S., Kee, S. Y., Cheong, H. W., Song, J. Y., Kim, J. M., Park, Y. H., Jung, J. H., and Kim, W. J. (2007) Characteristics of non-typhoidal Salmonella iso-- Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 22, 773-778. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2007.22.5.773
  11. Choi, S., Park, S., Kim, Y., Kim, B.-S., Beuchat, L. R., Hoikyung, K., and Ryu, J.-H. (2015) Reduction of Salmonella enterica on the surface of eggshells by sequential treatment with aqueous chlorine dioxide and drying. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 210, 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.06.009
  12. Chousalkar, K. K., Flynn, P., Sutherland, M., Roberts, J. R., and Cheetham, B. F. (2010) Recovery of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from commercial egg shells and effect of translucency on bacterial penetration in eggs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 142, 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.029
  13. Drake, D. and Villhauer, A. L. (2011) An in vitro comparative study determining bactericidal activity of stabilized chl- orine dioxide and other oral rinses. J. Clin. Dent. 22, 1-5.
  14. Du, J., Han, Y., and Linton, R. H. (2002) Inactivation by chlorine dioxide gas (ClO2) of Listeria monocytogenes spotted onto different apple surfaces. Food Microbiol. 19, 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.2002.0501
  15. Du, J., Han, Y., and Linton, R. H. (2003) Efficacy of chlorine dioxide gas in reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on apple surfaces. Food Microbiol. 20, 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00129-6
  16. Dunnick, J. K., and Melnick, R. L. (1993) Assessment of the carcinogenic potential of chlorinated water - Experimental studies of chlorine, chloramine, and trihalomethanes. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85, 817-822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.10.817
  17. ECDC, EFSA. Multi-country outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis infections associated with consumption of eggs from Germany. Retrieved from: www.efsa.europa.eu/publications. Accessed2014
  18. FDA. FDA improvesfood safety. Retrieved from: http://www. fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm170640.htm. Accessed Aug. 9, 2009
  19. FDA, USDA, CDC. Guidance for industry - guide to minimize microbial food safety hazards for fresh fruits and vegetables. Retrieved from: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~DMA/prod guid.html. Accessed 1998
  20. Gole, V. C., Roberts, J. R., Sexton, M., May, D., Kiermeier, A., and Chousalkar, K. K. (2014) Effect of egg washing and correlation between cuticle and egg penetration by various Salmonella strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 182-183, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.030
  21. Han, Y., Linton, R. H., Nielsen, S. S., and Nelson, P. E. (2001) Reduction of Listeria monocytogenes on green peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) by gaseous and aqueous chlorine dioxide and water washing and its growth at 7 degrees C. J. Food Prot. 64, 1730-1738. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1730
  22. Hsu, C. S. and Huang, D. J. (2013) Disinfection efficiency of chlorine dioxide gas in student cafeterias in Taiwan. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 63, 796-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.735212
  23. Hsu, C. S. and Huang, D. J. (2015) Disinfection of herbal spa pool using combined chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite treatment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4242-3
  24. Kim, A., Lee, Y. J., Kang, M. S., Kwag, S. I., and Cho, J. K. (2007) Dissemination and tracking of Salmonella spp. in integrated broiler operation. J. Vet. Sci. 8, 155-161. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2007.8.2.155
  25. Kim, A. R., Kim, J. H., Lee, Y. J., Cho, Y. M., Kwon, J. H., Kwon, Y. K., Lee, Y. J., Choi, J. G., Joh, S. J., Kim, M. C., and Lee, E. K. (2006) The prevalence of pullorum disease-fowl typhoid in grand parent stock and parent stock in Korea, 2003. Korean J. Vet. Res. 46, 347-353.
  26. Kim, J., Du, W. X., Otwell, W. S., Marshall, M. R., and Wei, C. I. (1998) Nutrients in salmon and red grouper fillets as affected by chlorine dioxide (ClO2) treatment. J. Food Sci. 63, 629-633.
  27. Knape, K. D., Carey, J. B., and Ricke, S. C. (2001) Response of foodborne Salmonella spp. marker strains inoculated on egg shell surfaces to disinfectants in a commercial egg washer. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 36, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1081/PFC-100103745
  28. Kwon, Y. K., Kim, A., Kang, M. S., Her, M., Jung, B. Y., Lee, K. M., Jeong, W., An, B. K., and Kwon, J. H. (2010) Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella Gallinarum in the chicken in Korea during 2000 to 2008. Poult. Sci. 89, 236-242. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00420
  29. Lee, S. Y., Costello, M., and Kang, D. H. (2004) Efficacy of chlorine dioxide gas as a sanitizer of lettuce leaves. J. Food Prot. 67, 1371-1376. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.7.1371
  30. Lowe, J. J., Gibbs, S. G., Iwen, P. C., Smith, P. W., and Hewlett, A. L. (2013) Decontamination of a hospital room using gaseous chlorine dioxide: Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis, and Yersinia pestis. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10, 533-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.818241
  31. MFDS (2009) Notification No. 2009-59 of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety.
  32. Moore, G. S., Calabrese, E. J., and Ho, S. C. (1980) Groups at potentially high-risk from chlorine dioxide treated water. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 4, 465-470.
  33. Morgan, O., Milne, L., Kumar, S., Murray, D., Man, W., Georgiou, M., Verlander, N. Q., de Pinna, E., and McEvoy, M. (2007) Outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 13a: case-control investigation in Hertsmere, United Kingdom. Euro Surveill. 12, E9-10.
  34. Owusuyaw, J., Toth, J. P., Wheeler, W. B., and Wei, C. I. (1990) Mutagenicity and identification of the reaction-products of aqueous chlorine or chlorine dioxide with L-tryptophan. J. Food Sci. 55, 1714-1719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb03607.x
  35. Prodduk, V., Annous, B. A., Liu, L., and Yam, K. L. (2014) Evaluation of chlorine dioxide gas treatment to inactivate Salmonella enterica on mungbean sprouts. J. Food Prot. 77, 1876-1881. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-407
  36. QIA (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Korea). Guidelines on disinfenctants efficacy, Notification No. 2013-34. Accessed mar. 23, 2013.
  37. Shivaprasad, H. L. (2000) Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. Rev. Sci .Tech. 19, 405-424. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.2.1222
  38. Soljour, G., Assanta, M. A., Messier, S., and Boulianne, M. (2004) Efficacy of egg cleaning compounds on eggshells contaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. J. Food Prot. 67, 706-712. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.4.706
  39. Sun, X., Bai, J., Ference, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Narciso, J., and Zhou, K. (2014) Antimicrobial activity of controlled-release chlorine dioxide gas on fresh blueberries. J. Food Prot. 77, 1127-1132. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-554
  40. Trinetta, V., Linton, R. H., and Morgan, M. T. (2013a) The application of high-concentration short-time chlorine dioxide treatment for selected specialty crops including Roma tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum), cantaloupes (Cucumis melo ssp. melo var. cantaloupensis) and strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa). Food Microbiol. 34, 296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.12.010
  41. Trinetta, V., Linton, R. H., and Morgan, M. T. (2013b) Use of chlorine dioxide gas for the postharvest control of Alternaria alternata and Stemphylium vesicarium on Roma tomatoes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 3330-3333. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6180
  42. Trinetta, V., Vaid, R., Xu, Q., Linton, R., and Morgan, M. (2012) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes on ready-toeat food processing equipment by chlorine dioxide gas. Food Control 26, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.008
  43. Watamoto, T., Egusa, H., Sawase, T., and Yatani, H. (2013) Clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide for disinfection of dental instruments. Int. J. Prosthodont. 26, 541-544. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3465
  44. WHO. Salmonella (non-typhoidal). Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets. Accessed 2013
  45. Zielicka-Hardy, A., Zarowna, D., Szych, J., Madajczak, G., and Sadkowska-Todys, M. (2012) Ensuring safety of homeproduced eggs to control salmonellosis in Poland: lessons from an outbreak in September 2011. Euro Surveill. 17, 12-19.

피인용 문헌

  1. Applications of industrial eggshell as a valuable anthropogenic resource vol.123, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.027
  2. Effect of Chlorine Dioxide Gas Application to Egg Surface: Microbial Reduction Effect, Quality of Eggs, and Hatchability vol.38, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.3.487
  3. Inhibition of Clinical Nosocomial Bacteria by Chlorine Dioxide vol.25, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15616/bsl.2019.25.4.431
  4. Usefulness of Chlorine Dioxide to Airborne Bacteria at a Hospital Using Biological Information vol.6, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.20465/kiots.2020.6.2.019