Comparison of Three Supraglottic Airway Devices in Neutral and Cervical Neck Collar Position

융복합적 기술이 적용된 성문위기구들의 삽관용이성 비교

Purpose of this study was to compare the easiness of insertion of three Supraglottic airway devices(SADs) in a neutral and cervical neck collar position in a manikin setting. Three different SADs-Laryngeal Mask Classic (LMA), I-gel and Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway(SLIPA) were applied. Thirty nine emergency medical technicians (EMTs) who are working in Korea 119 rescue services were taught briefly about the use of the LMA, I-gel and SLIPA in a manikin setting. The time to effective ventilation was shorter in I-gel ($10.5{\pm}2.2$, $11.4{\pm}5.7$) and SLIPA ($12.3 {\pm}5.1$, $12.0{\pm}6.8$) than LMA ($17.2{\pm}3.2$, $18.5{\pm}5.5$) in a neutral and cervical neck collar position, respectively(p<0.05). There was no difference between head positions in each of the airways. In conclusion, in the speed of insertion, I-gel and SLIPA were superior to LMA in the neutral and cervical collar setting of a manikin.

본 연구는 환자의 경추보호대 착용 여부에 따른 후두마스크기도기(LMA)와 I-gel, Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway(SLIPA) 등 3가지 성문위기구의 삽관 용이성을 비교하기 위해 시행되었다. 응급의료현장에서 활동 중인 119 구급대원 39명에게 3가지 성문위기구에 대한 짧은 교육을 시행한 후 삽관시간과 삽관시도횟수를 측정하였다. 삽관시간은 중립위와 경추보호대 착용 시 모두 I-gel($10.5{\pm}2.2$, $11.4{\pm}5.7$), SLIPA($12.3 {\pm}5.1$, $12.0{\pm}6.8$), LMA($17.2{\pm}3.2$, $18.5{\pm}5.5$) 순으로 빨랐다 (p<0.05). 각 기도기별 중립위와 경추보호대 착용 시 삽관시간의 차이는 없었다. 결론적으로 I-gel과 SLIPA가 LMA보다 중립위와 경추보호대 착용 시 모두에서 삽관시간이 더 빠른 결과를 보였다.