보건행정학회지 (Health Policy and Management)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.279-288
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-4266(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0149(eISSN)
한국보건행정학회 (Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국에서의 담뱃갑 경고그림 도입과정 분석연구: 국회 보건복지위 회의록 분석을 중심으로

Introduction Process of the Tobacco Graphic Health Warning Law in Korea: Analysis on the National Assembly Minutes

  • Hwang, Ji-eun (Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-il (Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.26
  • 심사 : 2016.12.14
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Graphic health warning on the tobacco product package is a cost-effective tobacco control policy to convey information on harmful effect of tobacco use to health, and it is known not only to motivate smokers to quit but also to deter adolescents from start smoking. In case of Korea, amendments to National Health Promotion Act requiring implementation of graphic health warning had been submitted 13 times, from 2002 to May 2015. In May 2015, the amendment had been approved by the National Assembly and it enters into force on December 23, 2016. This research analyzed the discussions from Health and Welfare Committee of the National Assembly during the implementation of the graphic health warning in order to study decision making process of legislators. Study found that there was a shift from a general opposition on implementing graphic health warning at first to a harsh conflict over relaxation of the regulation once discussing the implementation in earnest. Particularly, while the group supporting the implementation of the graphic health warning or opposing relaxation advocated the amendment with scientific and knowledge-based evidences including the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the group opposing the adoption of the amendment itself or suggesting relaxation tended to defend their position with empathy on smokers or tobacco industries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, Cummings KM. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11 Suppl 1:i73-i80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73.
  2. Perreault WD, McCarthy EJ. Basic marketing: a global-managerial approach. 13th ed. Boston (MA): Irwin McGraw-Hill; 1999.
  3. Underwood RL, Klein NM, Burke RR. Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. J Prod Brand Manag 2001;10(7):403-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420110410531.
  4. Meyers HM, Lubliner MJ. The marketer's guide to successful package design. Lincolnwood (IL): NTC Business Books; 1998.
  5. Slade J. The pack as advertisement. Tob Control 1997;6(3):169-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.6.3.169.
  6. Underwood RL, Ozanne JL. Is your package an effective communicator?: a normative framework for increasing the communicative competence of packaging. J Mark Commun 1998;4(4):207-220. DIOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135272698345762.
  7. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, Ribisl KM, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control 2016;25(3):341-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978.
  8. Fong GT, Hammond D, Jiang Y, Li Q, Quah AC, Driezen P, et al. Perceptions of tobacco health warnings in China compared with picture and text-only health warnings from other countries: an experimental study. Tob Control 2010;19 Suppl 2:i69-i77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.036483.
  9. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011;20(5):327-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.037630.
  10. Strasser AA, Tang KZ, Romer D, Jepson C, Cappella JN. Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(1):41-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026.
  11. Shieh C, Hosei B. Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability. J Community Health Nurs 2008;25(2):73-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370010802017083.
  12. World Health Organization. WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
  13. World Health Organization. WHO framework convention on tobacco control: guidelines for implementation of Article 11 (guidelines on packaging and labelling of tobacco products). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  14. Canadian Cancer Society. Cigarette package health warnings: international status report. 4th ed. Toronto [ON]: Canadian Cancer Society; 2014.
  15. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Pictorial health warning on tobacco mandatory law, the National Assembly passed. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2015.
  16. The University of Waterloo in the School of Public Health and Health Systems. Tobacco control labels [Internet]. Waterloo (ON): The University of Waterloo in the School of Public Health and Health Systems; 2015 [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/category/news.
  17. Shin YJ, Hyun YJ, Lee JH; Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Center for Health Promotion R&D Assessment. Policy recommendation for strengthening packaging and labeling regulation of tobacco products. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006.
  18. National Health Promotion Act, No. 13367 (Jun 22, 2015).
  19. Tobacco Business Act, No. 12269 (Jan 21, 2014).
  20. Notice the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, No. 2014-16 (Sep 29, 2014).
  21. Juvenile Protection Act, No. 12699 (Jan 6, 2016).
  22. Kwon ES, Lee YH. A study on decision determinants in the National Assembly. Korean Soc Public Adm 2012;23(1):317-341.
  23. Seo IS, Lee DK, Park HJ. What affect national assemblymen' policy making behavior in a standing committee?: mixed method approach to minutes of standing committee about water resource budget review. Korean J Public Adm 2010;19(1):79-100. https://doi.org/10.22897/KIPAJN.2010.19.1.004
  24. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  25. Hwang YW. The determinants of the legislative budget authorization in Korea. Korean Public Adm Rev 1993;27(2):437-457.
  26. Park CW, Kim JK. Study on the system of the Standing Committees in the 14th National Assembly and their decision making. Korean Polit Stud 1997;7:449-488.
  27. Chang MS, Yoon SS. Articles of general interest: empirical analysis of determining factors of budget deliberation of the National Assembly: focusing on the Budget Committee. Korea Assoc Policy Stud 2002;11(2):99-121.
  28. Kim IC, Kang MH, Kim DH. Patterns and determinants on government budget review in the National Assembly: the case of Korea. J Int Area Stud 2002;5(4):171-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18327/jias.2002.01.5.4.171.
  29. Constitution of the Republic of Korean, No. 10 (Oct 29, 1987).
  30. Park DY. Constitutional issues of restrictions on tobacco advertising: focused on constitutional issues of graphic warning labels of tobacco products in the United States. Anam Law Rev 2014;44:357-388.
  31. Ru HM. Congressional expert members reviewed the report. Tobacco Business Act revision bill (Kim Young-rok lawmakers). Seoul: The Strategy and Finance Committee of the National Assembly; 2014.
  32. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Warning labels: countering industry arguments. Washington (DC): The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids; 2011.
  33. Enforcement Decree of the Promotion of the Motion Pictures and Video Products Act, No. 26625 (Nov 30, 2015).
  34. Civil Execution Act, No. 13286 (May 18, 2015).
  35. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Notice of welfare equipment such as salary ranges and salary standards. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2014.
  36. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Pan government, announced: a comprehensive tobacco control plan. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2014.
  37. Korea Health Promotion Foundation. Tobacco control issue report. Seoul: Korea Health Promotion Foundation; 2014.