Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Public Health Policy and Health Equity

공중보건정책과 건강 형평성

  • Received : 2012.12.12
  • Accepted : 2016.12.23
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Equity-focused public health policy has solid theoretical and practical basis, in addition to ethical one. In the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea), however, equity in health has not had a high priority in policy goals, regardless of policy areas and particular actors or approaches. Equitable health has been only a minor concern in most public health issues and their decision-making. Generic public health policies are needed to reduce inequity in health, but the importance of a firm basis for sound policy-making cannot be overemphasized. Health equity should be 'mainstreamed' in all public health policies. Potential approaches include intersectoral collaboration, health impact assessment, and 'Health in All Policies.' Public policy agendas for equitable health cannot be formulated without measurement and recognition of the problem. Korea is still suffering from the lack of reliable information on the current status of health inequity, resulting in a relatively weak awareness of the problem among both the general public and policy-makers. More information is needed to increase recognition and awareness that will increase intervention and actions. The absence of decision-making and actions should not be justified even by the lack of information on determinants and pathways of health inequities. Generic plausible solutions can often work in the real world according to political and social commitment. I have discussed several aspects of public health policy from the perspective of health equity, focusing on current status and plausible explanation. Policy process, agenda setting in particular, is highlighted and theories and concepts are presented along with analysis and description of current situation.

Keywords

References

  1. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv 1992;22(3):429-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/986l-lhq6-2vte-yrrn.
  2. Kim CY, Kim MH, Lee TJ, Sohn JI. Inequality in health: a Korean perspective. Seoul: Seoul National University Press; 2015.
  3. Kim CY. Health inequity and its implication. In: Lee JW, Lee CG, editors. Inequality in Korea and welfare state. Seoul: Humanitas; 2015.
  4. Wilkinson RG, Pickett K. The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York (NY): Bloomsbury Press; 2010.
  5. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
  6. Kim YM, Jung-Choi K. Socioeconomic inequalities in health risk factors in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2013;56(3):175-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.3.175.
  7. Bahk J, Lynch JW, Khang YH. Forty years of economic growth and plummeting mortality: the mortality experience of the poorly educated in South Korea. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016 Oct 5 [Epub]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207707.
  8. Veatch RM. Justice and the right to health care: an egalitarian account. In: Bole TJ, Bondeson WB, editors. Rights to health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1991. pp. 83-102.
  9. Daniels N. Just health: meeting health needs fairly. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  10. Capewell S, Graham H. Will cardiovascular disease prevention widen health inequalities? PLoS Med 2010;7(8):e1000320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000320.
  11. World Health Organization. Health in All Policies (HiAP) framework for country action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  12. United Nations Economic and Social Council. Mainstreaming the gender perspective into all policies and programmes in the United Nations system: agreed conclusions [Internet]. New York (NY): United Nations; 1997 [cited 2016 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/ECOSOCAC1997.2.PDF.
  13. Thomas S, Fayter D, Misso K, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Sowden A, et al. Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. Tob Control 2008;17(4):230-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.023911.
  14. Health Disparities Task Group of the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health and Health Security. Reducing health disparities-roles of the health sector: discussion paper. Ottawa (ON): Public Health Agency of Canada; 2004.
  15. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985;14(1):32-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/14.1.32.
  16. Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health 2008;98(2):216-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777.
  17. Carey G, McLoughlin P. The powerful pull of policy targeting: examining residualisation in Australia. Crit Public Health 2014;26(2):147-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.973018.
  18. Carey G, Crammond B, De Leeuw E. Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate universalism. Int J Equity Health 2015;14:81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0207-6.
  19. Collier A. Critical realism: an introduction to Roy Bhaskar's philosophy. London: Verso; 1994.
  20. Diderichsen F, Hallqvist J. Social inequalities in health: some methodological considerations for the study of social position and social context. In: Arve-Pares B, editor. Inequality in health: a Swedish perspective. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Social Research; 1998. pp. 25-39.
  21. Public Health Agency of Canada, World Health Organization. Health equity through intersectoral action: an analysis of 18 country case studies. Ottawa (ON): Public Health Agency of Canada; 2008.
  22. Lawn JE, Rohde J, Rifkin S, Were M, Paul VK, Chopra M. Alma-Ata 30 years on: revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalise. Lancet 2008;372(9642):917-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61402-6.
  23. Stead D. Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transp Policy 2008;15(3):139-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.12.001.
  24. Ndumbe-Eyoh S, Moffatt H. Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1):1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1056.
  25. Chircop A, Bassett R, Taylor E. Evidence on how to practice intersectoral collaboration for health equity: a scoping review. Crit Public Health 2014;25(2):178-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.887831.
  26. Van Der Wel KA, Dahl E, Bergsli H. The Norwegian policy to reduce health inequalities: key challenges. Nordic Welf Res 2016;1(1):19-29.
  27. World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  28. Parry J, Stevens A. Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward. BMJ 2001;323(7322):1177-1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1177.
  29. Povall SL, Haigh FA, Abrahams D, Scott-Samuel A. Health equity impact assessment. Health Promot Int 2014;29(4):621-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dat012.
  30. Kim MH, Lee J. Current status of policy developments in tackling health inequalities and the next steps to be taken in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2013;56(3):206-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.3.206.
  31. Leppo K, Ollila E, Pena S, Wismar M, Cook S. Health in All Policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland; 2013.
  32. Wernham A, Teutsch SM. Health in all policies for big cities. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015;21 Suppl 1:S56-S65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000130.
  33. Stahl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. Health in All Policies: prospects and potentials. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland; 2006.
  34. Whitehead M. Diffusion of ideas on social inequalities in health: a European perspective. Milbank Q 1998;76(3):469-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00099.
  35. Ham C, Hill M. The policy process in the modern capitalist state. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books; 1986.
  36. Walt G. Health policy. London: Zed Books; 1994.
  37. Lukes S. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
  38. Wright EO. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso; 2010.